This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "FHIR Consent November 9, 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|| X||[mailto:david.pyke@readycomputing.com David Pyke] CBCC co-Chair | || X||[mailto:david.pyke@readycomputing.com David Pyke] CBCC co-Chair | ||
||||.||[mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] CBCC Co-Chair | ||||.||[mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] CBCC Co-Chair | ||
| − | |||| | + | ||||X||[mailto:suzanne.gonzales-webb@va.gov Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-Chair |
||||.||[mailto:grahame@healthintersections.com.au Grahame Grieve] FHIR Director | ||||.||[mailto:grahame@healthintersections.com.au Grahame Grieve] FHIR Director | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| .||[mailto:mense@technikum-wien.at Alexander Mense] Security Co-Chair | || .||[mailto:mense@technikum-wien.at Alexander Mense] Security Co-Chair | ||
| − | |||| | + | ||||X||[mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] Security Co-Chair |
| − | |||| | + | ||||X||[mailto:johnmoehrke@gmail.com John Moehrke]Security Co-Chair |
||||.||[mailto:jkretz@samhsa.hhs.gov Jim Kretz] CBCC Co-Chair | ||||.||[mailto:jkretz@samhsa.hhs.gov Jim Kretz] CBCC Co-Chair | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| .||Peter Branson | || .||Peter Branson | ||
| − | |||| | + | ||||X||[mailto:david.staggs@securityrs.com David Staggs] |
||||.||[mailto:ksalyards@samhsa.hhs.gov Ken Salyards] | ||||.||[mailto:ksalyards@samhsa.hhs.gov Ken Salyards] | ||
||||.||[mailto:Diana.Proud-Madruga@engilitycorp.com Diana Proud-Madruga] | ||||.||[mailto:Diana.Proud-Madruga@engilitycorp.com Diana Proud-Madruga] | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|| .||[mailto:igor.sirkovich@rogers.com Igor Sirkovich] | || .||[mailto:igor.sirkovich@rogers.com Igor Sirkovich] | ||
||||.||[mailto:ali.khan@esacinc.com Ali Khan ONC Patient Choice Project rep] | ||||.||[mailto:ali.khan@esacinc.com Ali Khan ONC Patient Choice Project rep] | ||
| − | |||| | + | ||||X||[mailto:saurav.chowdhury@esacinc.com Saurav Chowdhury] |
||||.||[mailto:glinden@lindentechadvisors.com Greg Linden] | ||||.||[mailto:glinden@lindentechadvisors.com Greg Linden] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
* Roll-call | * Roll-call | ||
| + | * Feedback on Research Use Case with ONC project | ||
* Consent Track for FHIR Connectathon | * Consent Track for FHIR Connectathon | ||
* Australian Organ donation use case review | * Australian Organ donation use case review | ||
| Line 68: | Line 69: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
* Roll-call | * Roll-call | ||
| + | * Saurav, KC and Ali met to discuss the research use case. Further discussions with all stakeholders forthcoming. | ||
| + | * Aaron Seib and Graham ran a consent track last Connectathon. This year focus on the technology choice (OAuth) for decisions and ceremony outputting Consent resource as documentation but not decisions. This is not a final design. The consent resource will show the relationship that has been made but no Consent.provision would be required. | ||
| + | ** Kathleen to write up cases for existing Consent track | ||
| + | *Current Research Tracks on Connectathon are ignoring Consent as it's in the past for their work. They have been given info that such a thing exists but no interest so far. | ||
| + | ** If BRR/Research track connection has not yet been made, then can be done at Connectathon | ||
| + | * Australian Organ Donation use case was presented. | ||
| + | ** Suzanne sees this as a national use case but not necessarily a scope increase | ||
| + | ** Let Australia do the work for others to adopt | ||
| + | * Dave to send email regarding CR 13420 to get and understanding of how widespread the problem is. | ||
Latest revision as of 18:50, 9 November 2017
Contents
HL7 CBCP FHIR Consent Working Meeting
Weekly Meeting Logistics
Weekly meeting; Thursday 1:00 - 2:00 PM Eastern Time
Dial-in Number: (515) 604-9861
International Dial-in Numbers are provided
Access Code: 429554
Online Meeting Link: http://join.freeconferencecall.com/cbhs
Back to FHIR Consent Directive Project Main Page
Attendees
| Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | David Pyke CBCC co-Chair | . | Johnathan Coleman CBCC Co-Chair | X | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | . | Grahame Grieve FHIR Director | ||||
| . | Alexander Mense Security Co-Chair | X | Kathleen Connor Security Co-Chair | X | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-Chair | . | Jim Kretz CBCC Co-Chair | ||||
| . | Peter Branson | X | David Staggs | . | Ken Salyards | . | Diana Proud-Madruga | ||||
| . | Mike Davis | . | Neelima Chennamaraja | . | Ken Sinn | . | Beth Pumo | ||||
| . | Joe Lamy, Aegis | . | Joseph Quinn | . | Iona Thraen | . | Serafina Versaggi | ||||
| . | Igor Sirkovich | . | Ali Khan ONC Patient Choice Project rep | X | Saurav Chowdhury | . | Greg Linden | ||||
| . | Lisa Nelson | . | Hank MayersPCWG Representative | . | Laura Heermann Langford PCWG Co-chair | . | Steve Eichner |
Back to FHIR Consent Directive Project Main Page
Agenda
- Roll-call
- Feedback on Research Use Case with ONC project
- Consent Track for FHIR Connectathon
- Australian Organ donation use case review
- Review open CRs as time allows
Minutes
- Roll-call
- Saurav, KC and Ali met to discuss the research use case. Further discussions with all stakeholders forthcoming.
- Aaron Seib and Graham ran a consent track last Connectathon. This year focus on the technology choice (OAuth) for decisions and ceremony outputting Consent resource as documentation but not decisions. This is not a final design. The consent resource will show the relationship that has been made but no Consent.provision would be required.
- Kathleen to write up cases for existing Consent track
- Current Research Tracks on Connectathon are ignoring Consent as it's in the past for their work. They have been given info that such a thing exists but no interest so far.
- If BRR/Research track connection has not yet been made, then can be done at Connectathon
- Australian Organ Donation use case was presented.
- Suzanne sees this as a national use case but not necessarily a scope increase
- Let Australia do the work for others to adopt
- Dave to send email regarding CR 13420 to get and understanding of how widespread the problem is.
