Difference between revisions of "201709 Care Plan"
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [ | + | [[FHIR_Connectathon_16 | Return to September 2017 FHIR Connectathon 16]] |
[[Category:201709_FHIR_Connectathon_Track_Proposals|September 2017 Proposals]] | [[Category:201709_FHIR_Connectathon_Track_Proposals|September 2017 Proposals]] | ||
{| align="right" | {| align="right" | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=Care Plan= | =Care Plan= | ||
− | '''Dedicated [https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/ | + | '''Dedicated [https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/connectathon.20mgmt/subject/C16.20Care.20Plan.20Track Zulip chat stream] for this track.''' |
==Submitting WG/Project/Implementer Group== | ==Submitting WG/Project/Implementer Group== | ||
* [[Patient_Care | HL7 Patient Care Workgroup]] | * [[Patient_Care | HL7 Patient Care Workgroup]] | ||
− | |||
* [http://hspconsortium.org Healthcare Services Platform Consortium (HSPC)] | * [http://hspconsortium.org Healthcare Services Platform Consortium (HSPC)] | ||
Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
* [[201701 Care Plan]], January 2017, San Antonio, TX | * [[201701 Care Plan]], January 2017, San Antonio, TX | ||
* [[201704 Care Plan]], April 2017, Chicago, IL | * [[201704 Care Plan]], April 2017, Chicago, IL | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Summary presentation slides after conclusion of CarePlan track''' | ||
+ | * Presentation slides [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/c/c7/CarePlanTrackSummary_September-2017.pdf as PDF], or [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/0/00/CarePlanTrackSummary_September-2017.pptx as PowerPoint] | ||
==Justification== | ==Justification== | ||
Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
* It should be holistic and describe both clinical and nonclinical (including home- and community-based) needs and services. | * It should be holistic and describe both clinical and nonclinical (including home- and community-based) needs and services. | ||
* It should follow the person through high-need episodes (e.g., acute illness), as well as periods of health improvement and maintenance. | * It should follow the person through high-need episodes (e.g., acute illness), as well as periods of health improvement and maintenance. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In addition to advancing the maturity of FHIR resources for care planning, this track invites participation by clinicians and implementers who are interested in ''using'' these FHIR standards to achieve the vision of comprehensive shared care plans. As a first step toward this vision, we have included a new participant role, CDS Service Requestor, that begins to evaluate and demonstrate use of FHIR care planning resources for the active management of a patient's healthcare. | ||
==Proposed Track Lead== | ==Proposed Track Lead== | ||
Line 49: | Line 53: | ||
* Other resources as needed for value of CarePlan.activity.reference | * Other resources as needed for value of CarePlan.activity.reference | ||
− | A FHIR server is available for testing with sample data that represent | + | A FHIR server is available for testing with sample data that represent one or more care plan scenarios. |
− | * HSPC sandbox server (FHIR 3.0.1) at https://api-stu3.hspconsortium.org/ | + | * HSPC sandbox server (FHIR 3.0.1) at https://api-stu3.hspconsortium.org/careplantest/open |
* Test data JSON files are [https://github.com/clinical-cloud/sample-data available in a GitHub repository] that may be loaded into other FHIR v3.0 servers. | * Test data JSON files are [https://github.com/clinical-cloud/sample-data available in a GitHub repository] that may be loaded into other FHIR v3.0 servers. | ||
Line 56: | Line 60: | ||
<!-- Provide a description of the capabilities this role will have within the connectathon --> | <!-- Provide a description of the capabilities this role will have within the connectathon --> | ||
This connectathon track imposes few requirements for interested participants to evaluate and test retrieval of care plan resources from a Care Plan Server. We wish to encourage discussion and testing that will lead to robust industry support for shared care plans. Thus, a requestor role could be fulfilled by a range of applications, such as the following: | This connectathon track imposes few requirements for interested participants to evaluate and test retrieval of care plan resources from a Care Plan Server. We wish to encourage discussion and testing that will lead to robust industry support for shared care plans. Thus, a requestor role could be fulfilled by a range of applications, such as the following: | ||
− | * Debug testing tools for RESTful services, e.g. Postman, that allow query of participating | + | * Debug testing tools for RESTful services, e.g. Postman, that allow query of participating Care Plan Server using a variety of parameters such as plan category or date. |
* SMART on FHIR applications that embed Care Plan review and editing capabilities into any EHR system that supports these services. | * SMART on FHIR applications that embed Care Plan review and editing capabilities into any EHR system that supports these services. | ||
* SMART on FHIR mobile applications that enable patients to view, contribute to, or check off completed activities included in a care plan created by their care team member(s). | * SMART on FHIR mobile applications that enable patients to view, contribute to, or check off completed activities included in a care plan created by their care team member(s). | ||
===CDS Service Requestor=== | ===CDS Service Requestor=== | ||
+ | * [[201709_CDS_Hooks]] | ||
* Invoke a [http://cds-hooks.org/ CDS Hooks Service] that guides a clinician or a patient toward fulfillment of a Care Plan's goals, or suggests additional activities based on clinical practice guidelines. The CDS Hooks Service provides real-time clinical decision support as a remote service, where the CDS Server is invoked on a desired hook and returns the decision support in the form of CDS cards. | * Invoke a [http://cds-hooks.org/ CDS Hooks Service] that guides a clinician or a patient toward fulfillment of a Care Plan's goals, or suggests additional activities based on clinical practice guidelines. The CDS Hooks Service provides real-time clinical decision support as a remote service, where the CDS Server is invoked on a desired hook and returns the decision support in the form of CDS cards. | ||
** Evaluate progress toward care plan goals | ** Evaluate progress toward care plan goals | ||
+ | *** Invoke 'patient-view' hook on all known CDS service endpoints | ||
*** Query and analyze relevant Observations related to a Goal target measure (e.g. blood glucose, weight, etc.) | *** Query and analyze relevant Observations related to a Goal target measure (e.g. blood glucose, weight, etc.) | ||
*** Notify care team members when insufficient progress | *** Notify care team members when insufficient progress | ||
Line 68: | Line 74: | ||
*** CDS service uses clinical practice guidelines for preventive care or chronic condition management | *** CDS service uses clinical practice guidelines for preventive care or chronic condition management | ||
− | == | + | ==Optional Roles== |
− | This track emphasizes dynamic care planning | + | |
+ | * [[201709_FHIR_Subscriptions]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[201709_Provider_Directories_and_Scheduling]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Scenarios== | ||
+ | This track emphasizes dynamic care planning scenarios where the care plan is created, accessed, or updated by one or more members of the care team during the provision of healthcare, and the care plan is used by a patient or his/her caregivers to perform assigned activities. These scenarios illustrate communication flow of care plan(s) between a patient, his or her primary care provider, consulted specialists, home health care, telehealth care, and family caregivers involved in management of care for one or more health conditions. | ||
===Chronic Conditions=== | ===Chronic Conditions=== | ||
− | + | This scenario is based on Section 3.4 of the [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Care_Plan_Project_-_PCWG#Care_Plan_Domain_Analysis_Model_.28DAM.29_Documents HL7 Care Plan Domain Analysis Model (DAM)] documents dated 2015-11-04. | |
− | * Primary Care | + | * Primary Care Plan |
− | ** Patient has a current care plan for one or more pre-existing condition (e.g. Hypertension, | + | ** Patient has a current care plan for one or more pre-existing condition (e.g. Hypertension, COPD, Depression, etc.) |
− | + | * Diagnosis of a new condition (e.g. Diabetes) | |
+ | ** Update the care plan to reference the new Condition, Goal(s) for care, and intervention activities | ||
+ | ** Add members to the care team, as needed | ||
* Include patient-assigned goals and activities | * Include patient-assigned goals and activities | ||
** daily measurement of blood pressure, blood glucose, etc. | ** daily measurement of blood pressure, blood glucose, etc. | ||
** daily or weekly exercise goals | ** daily or weekly exercise goals | ||
+ | ** scheduled follow-up appointments, or patient-assigned activities to schedule future appointment(s) | ||
===Multi-Provider Care Coordination=== | ===Multi-Provider Care Coordination=== | ||
− | * Primary Care Physician | + | * Primary Care Physician (PCP) |
− | * Specialist | + | ** PCP manages care for existing conditions, as in the first scenario |
+ | * Specialist referral to a different provider organization | ||
+ | ** e.g. referral to OB/GYN for prenatal care, or to physical therapist for rehab | ||
+ | * Specialist practitioner creates a new care plan using his/her organization's EHR system | ||
* Coordinate and notify care plan updates between provider organizations | * Coordinate and notify care plan updates between provider organizations | ||
+ | ==Clinical Domain Scenarios== | ||
+ | These clinical scenarios are complementary to the general care planning and care coordination scenarios listed in the previous section. Each clinical scenario described below is based on contributions from communities interested in solutions using FHIR Care Plan. | ||
− | == | + | ===Prenatal Care Coordination=== |
+ | This scenario is based on a realistic Veteran Persona developed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, but may also represent coordination of care for any pregnancy. "Meghan" is a post-9/11 Veteran who served in Afghanistan and is recovering from a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and PTSD. Meghan recently became pregnant with her third child and is coordinating care plans between her primary care provider at VA and a community provider outside of VA for her OB/GYN and prenatal care. Meghan has concerns about possible negative effects of her PTSD anti-anxiety medication on her new baby. | ||
− | + | The key actors in this scenario are: | |
− | |||
* Meghan, the patient | * Meghan, the patient | ||
* Dr. Francis, MD, primary care provider at VA | * Dr. Francis, MD, primary care provider at VA | ||
Line 97: | Line 118: | ||
* Dr. Rattle, OB/GYN from non-VA provider, responsible for Meghan's prenatal care plan | * Dr. Rattle, OB/GYN from non-VA provider, responsible for Meghan's prenatal care plan | ||
− | ===Malnutrition=== | + | ===Malnutrition Care Coordination=== |
This scenario was created by the [[Nutrition_Management | HL7 Nutrition Management project team]]. | This scenario was created by the [[Nutrition_Management | HL7 Nutrition Management project team]]. | ||
Line 109: | Line 130: | ||
**Nutrition Intervention – Nutrition Orders to modify diet and add high calorie/high protein oral nutritional supplement 2x/day (see [http://hl7.org/fhir/nutritionorder.html NutritionOrder] Resource) | **Nutrition Intervention – Nutrition Orders to modify diet and add high calorie/high protein oral nutritional supplement 2x/day (see [http://hl7.org/fhir/nutritionorder.html NutritionOrder] Resource) | ||
**Nutrition Education – referral to outpatient dietitian for follow-up | **Nutrition Education – referral to outpatient dietitian for follow-up | ||
− | *Care Coordination – (referral for community services - e.g. Meals on Wheels, and Home Health Services upon discharge) | + | * Care Coordination – (referral for community services - e.g. Meals on Wheels, and Home Health Services upon discharge) |
− | + | * Care plans should be updated and shared with outpatient dietitian, PCP and Home Health Agency, patient, and family caregiver (daughter) | |
− | Care plans should be updated and shared with outpatient dietitian, PCP and Home Health Agency, patient and family caregiver (daughter) |
Latest revision as of 19:31, 10 September 2017
Return to September 2017 FHIR Connectathon 16
Care Plan
Dedicated Zulip chat stream for this track.
Submitting WG/Project/Implementer Group
Previous Care Plan Connectathons
- 201701 Care Plan, January 2017, San Antonio, TX
- 201704 Care Plan, April 2017, Chicago, IL
Summary presentation slides after conclusion of CarePlan track
- Presentation slides as PDF, or as PowerPoint
Justification
This track is intended to advance the maturity of FHIR resources for care planning (CarePlan, CareTeam, Goal, Condition, and others) and to document industry best practices for improving care coordination using shared care plans. This work will inform the development of more comprehensive implementation guides and profiles for care planning based on FHIR Release 3 (STU), which is the primary target for testing in this track. This connectathon track will be coordinated with testing of CarePlan by Clinicians on FHIR where they focus on clinical interoperability and harmonizing differences between the technical and clinical perspectives of FHIR resources.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently published an article that describes a vision for a Comprehensive Shared Care Plan (CSCP). HHS identifies these goals for a CSCP:
- It should allow a clinician to electronically view information that is directly relevant to his or her role in the care of the person; to easily identify which clinician is doing what; and to update other members of an interdisciplinary team on new developments.
- It should put the person’s goals (captured in his or her own words) at the center of decision-making and give that individual direct access to his or her information in the CSCP.
- It should be holistic and describe both clinical and nonclinical (including home- and community-based) needs and services.
- It should follow the person through high-need episodes (e.g., acute illness), as well as periods of health improvement and maintenance.
In addition to advancing the maturity of FHIR resources for care planning, this track invites participation by clinicians and implementers who are interested in using these FHIR standards to achieve the vision of comprehensive shared care plans. As a first step toward this vision, we have included a new participant role, CDS Service Requestor, that begins to evaluate and demonstrate use of FHIR care planning resources for the active management of a patient's healthcare.
Proposed Track Lead
- Dave Carlson – VA
- E-mail: Dave.Carlson@BookZurman.com
- Zulip: Dave Carlson
Expected participants
The following organizations have indicated an interest in participating in this track:
- VA
- HSPC
- Allscripts
- InterSystems
- Your organization here!
Roles
Care Plan Server
A FHIR server (version 3.0) should support the following resources for this track:
- CarePlan, CareTeam, Goal, Condition
- Other resources as needed for value of CarePlan.activity.reference
A FHIR server is available for testing with sample data that represent one or more care plan scenarios.
- HSPC sandbox server (FHIR 3.0.1) at https://api-stu3.hspconsortium.org/careplantest/open
- Test data JSON files are available in a GitHub repository that may be loaded into other FHIR v3.0 servers.
Care Plan Requestor
This connectathon track imposes few requirements for interested participants to evaluate and test retrieval of care plan resources from a Care Plan Server. We wish to encourage discussion and testing that will lead to robust industry support for shared care plans. Thus, a requestor role could be fulfilled by a range of applications, such as the following:
- Debug testing tools for RESTful services, e.g. Postman, that allow query of participating Care Plan Server using a variety of parameters such as plan category or date.
- SMART on FHIR applications that embed Care Plan review and editing capabilities into any EHR system that supports these services.
- SMART on FHIR mobile applications that enable patients to view, contribute to, or check off completed activities included in a care plan created by their care team member(s).
CDS Service Requestor
- 201709_CDS_Hooks
- Invoke a CDS Hooks Service that guides a clinician or a patient toward fulfillment of a Care Plan's goals, or suggests additional activities based on clinical practice guidelines. The CDS Hooks Service provides real-time clinical decision support as a remote service, where the CDS Server is invoked on a desired hook and returns the decision support in the form of CDS cards.
- Evaluate progress toward care plan goals
- Invoke 'patient-view' hook on all known CDS service endpoints
- Query and analyze relevant Observations related to a Goal target measure (e.g. blood glucose, weight, etc.)
- Notify care team members when insufficient progress
- Recommend additions to care plan activities
- CDS service uses clinical practice guidelines for preventive care or chronic condition management
- Evaluate progress toward care plan goals
Optional Roles
Scenarios
This track emphasizes dynamic care planning scenarios where the care plan is created, accessed, or updated by one or more members of the care team during the provision of healthcare, and the care plan is used by a patient or his/her caregivers to perform assigned activities. These scenarios illustrate communication flow of care plan(s) between a patient, his or her primary care provider, consulted specialists, home health care, telehealth care, and family caregivers involved in management of care for one or more health conditions.
Chronic Conditions
This scenario is based on Section 3.4 of the HL7 Care Plan Domain Analysis Model (DAM) documents dated 2015-11-04.
- Primary Care Plan
- Patient has a current care plan for one or more pre-existing condition (e.g. Hypertension, COPD, Depression, etc.)
- Diagnosis of a new condition (e.g. Diabetes)
- Update the care plan to reference the new Condition, Goal(s) for care, and intervention activities
- Add members to the care team, as needed
- Include patient-assigned goals and activities
- daily measurement of blood pressure, blood glucose, etc.
- daily or weekly exercise goals
- scheduled follow-up appointments, or patient-assigned activities to schedule future appointment(s)
Multi-Provider Care Coordination
- Primary Care Physician (PCP)
- PCP manages care for existing conditions, as in the first scenario
- Specialist referral to a different provider organization
- e.g. referral to OB/GYN for prenatal care, or to physical therapist for rehab
- Specialist practitioner creates a new care plan using his/her organization's EHR system
- Coordinate and notify care plan updates between provider organizations
Clinical Domain Scenarios
These clinical scenarios are complementary to the general care planning and care coordination scenarios listed in the previous section. Each clinical scenario described below is based on contributions from communities interested in solutions using FHIR Care Plan.
Prenatal Care Coordination
This scenario is based on a realistic Veteran Persona developed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, but may also represent coordination of care for any pregnancy. "Meghan" is a post-9/11 Veteran who served in Afghanistan and is recovering from a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and PTSD. Meghan recently became pregnant with her third child and is coordinating care plans between her primary care provider at VA and a community provider outside of VA for her OB/GYN and prenatal care. Meghan has concerns about possible negative effects of her PTSD anti-anxiety medication on her new baby.
The key actors in this scenario are:
- Meghan, the patient
- Dr. Francis, MD, primary care provider at VA
- Dr.Beach, PsyD, VA Psychotherapist counselor for Meghan's PTSD and anxiety conditions
- Vera, RN, the Maternity Care Coordinator (MCC) at VA helps manage Meghan's non-VA prenatal care
- Dr. Rattle, OB/GYN from non-VA provider, responsible for Meghan's prenatal care plan
Malnutrition Care Coordination
This scenario was created by the HL7 Nutrition Management project team.
An elderly male (70 year old) with existing conditions (previous smoker with lung cancer & COPD), living alone in home with limited income, recent unintended wt loss >20 lbs. Admitted to hospital due to injury from a fall.
- Malnutrition screen
- Malnutrition Screening Tool (3 part questionnaire, validated screening tool) = 2 (at risk)
- Nutrition/Dietitian Consult Order (inpatient) (Referral Request)
- Nutrition Assessment performed by dietitian including nutrition focused physical exam with findings of muscle wasting and loss of subcutaneous fat, poor daily intake < estimated nutrient needs
- Explore using new method of recording actual/reported intake by patient
- Nutrition Care Plan developed including reference to:
- Nutrition Intervention – Nutrition Orders to modify diet and add high calorie/high protein oral nutritional supplement 2x/day (see NutritionOrder Resource)
- Nutrition Education – referral to outpatient dietitian for follow-up
- Care Coordination – (referral for community services - e.g. Meals on Wheels, and Home Health Services upon discharge)
- Care plans should be updated and shared with outpatient dietitian, PCP and Home Health Agency, patient, and family caregiver (daughter)