This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2017-02-03PC CIMI POC Call Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
| width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' '' | | width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' '' | ||
− | * | + | * Jay: ask Lynn to enable CIMI NIB |
+ | * Galen: fill out CIMI NIB | ||
+ | * Galen: post reconciliation sheet on wiki | ||
+ | * Jay: merge analysis sheet, loinc sheet, ballot included sheet, and ballot reconciliation; put on google by Wednesday | ||
+ | * Susan: take results to VA, NPUAP, LOINC, SOLOR | ||
+ | * Susan: find eCQM | ||
|- | |- |
Latest revision as of 19:54, 3 February 2017
Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes
Minutes Template
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: Phone |
Date: 2017-02-03 Time: 10:00-11:00 CT | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
y | Richard Esmond | PenRad | |
y | Galen Mulrooney | JP Systems | |
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems / VA | |
y | Steve Hufnagel | ||
y | Susan Matney | Intermountain | |
Joey Coyle | Intermountain | ||
Gay Dolin | |||
Ash Davison | Intermountain | ||
Laura Heerman Langford | Intermountain | ||
y | Claude Nanjo | ||
Rob McClure | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- file NIB
- plan for ballot
- identify an eCQM
- DAM process
- finish Content
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- file NIB
- Jay to re-ask Lynn: move to CIMI, create line item, & copy Galen with last time's doc.
- plan for ballot
- finish content (= ?) (S, J) - early Feb; see #5
- support modeling of content - late Feb
- expression (J) - parallel
- eCQM - parallel
- DAM process (J) - parallel, lower priority
- identify an eCQM
- Susan to investigate; ANA.
- DAM process
- later
- Content
- Scope: LOINC, DAM, or assertion?
- Jay to merge LOINC, Analysis sheet, Ballot updated sheet, and relevant ballot reconciliation items for next week. Next week review, complete.
- on Google. Jay, Susan, Claude editors.
- Then Susan to ask NPUAP, VA for review. Maybe SOLOR. LOINC in March.
- Use VSAC collab for terms
- complete this by COB 2/10
- Panels are orderable items. Instances need to match order to result. If our result is an assertion, the panel code is a model binding, not a field value. So we need to include architectural guidance on pulling out model binding values for inclusion in instance data for implementation form specifiers.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.