This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "2017-01-27PC CIMI POC Call Minutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " <!-- LOOK FOR THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ****** TO ENTER INFORMATION--> Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes ==Minutes Template== ===Meeting Information=== {|border="1" cellpadding="...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 98: Line 98:
 
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/>
 
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/>
 
# LOINC gap: summarize gaps found so far; complete list
 
# LOINC gap: summarize gaps found so far; complete list
−
# Identify CQI candidate if possible (a great target for the CIMI process)
 
−
# Consider 'iso-semantic' question of assertion & evaluation patterns
 
  
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===
Line 114: Line 112:
  
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
−
* See Patient Care
+
* Preliminary discussion: how to make CIMI artifacts simple enough for users
 +
* Question of model bindings: where to they go
 +
** Evaluations have question codes
 +
** Assertions have values
 +
** Assertion properties: semantic binding is metadata. Can/Should it be in instances?
 +
*** Body site: FHIR property is <b>semantic equivalent</b> of LOINC body site, and of SCT Finding site in finding context
 +
**** So we can leave the LOINC code out? Is there any recordkeeping or administrative reason to have it?
 +
**** Yes, for ordered panels, not so much for sub-panels?
 +
* Question of structure
 +
** Site has a code or an associated structure
 +
** How much do we need to worry about it here in the requirements stage vs design?
 +
* Cardinality
 +
** Not just Tunneling but other properties may need to be 0:N, e.g., wound edge appearance, tunneling
 +
** If so, do we need to fragment body site for respective bits? Is this too much detail?
 +
** Tunneling has clock position: do we need some other way to designate sub-body-site? To assign an identifier?
 +
* Clinicians want these properties to be their own Evaluations
 +
** maybe not Evaluation class, but to carry both question and answer.
 +
* Model details
 +
** Remove Stage from pressure ulcer
 +
** Rename to Pressure Injury?
  
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
 
===Meeting Outcomes===

Latest revision as of 16:37, 27 January 2017

Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes

Minutes Template

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes

Location: Phone

Date: 2017-01-27
Time: 10:00-11:00 CT
Facilitator Jay Lyle Note taker(s) Jay Lyle
Attendee Name Affiliation


y Richard Esmond PenRad
y Galen Mulrooney JP Systems
y Jay Lyle JP Systems / VA
y Larry McKnight Cerner
y Susan Matney Intermountain
y Joey Coyle Intermountain
Gay Dolin
Ash Davison Intermountain
Laura Heerman Langford Intermountain
Claude Nanjo
Rob McClure

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. LOINC gap: summarize gaps found so far; complete list

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  • Preliminary discussion: how to make CIMI artifacts simple enough for users
  • Question of model bindings: where to they go
    • Evaluations have question codes
    • Assertions have values
    • Assertion properties: semantic binding is metadata. Can/Should it be in instances?
      • Body site: FHIR property is semantic equivalent of LOINC body site, and of SCT Finding site in finding context
        • So we can leave the LOINC code out? Is there any recordkeeping or administrative reason to have it?
        • Yes, for ordered panels, not so much for sub-panels?
  • Question of structure
    • Site has a code or an associated structure
    • How much do we need to worry about it here in the requirements stage vs design?
  • Cardinality
    • Not just Tunneling but other properties may need to be 0:N, e.g., wound edge appearance, tunneling
    • If so, do we need to fragment body site for respective bits? Is this too much detail?
    • Tunneling has clock position: do we need some other way to designate sub-body-site? To assign an identifier?
  • Clinicians want these properties to be their own Evaluations
    • maybe not Evaluation class, but to carry both question and answer.
  • Model details
    • Remove Stage from pressure ulcer
    • Rename to Pressure Injury?

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2017-01-27PC_CIMI_POC_Call_Minutes&oldid=132377"