This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 81"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[10:26:24 AM] Gunther Schadow says: probably fine to say it should be positive. | [10:26:24 AM] Gunther Schadow says: probably fine to say it should be positive. | ||
[10:26:44 AM] Gunther Schadow says: should be positive. | [10:26:44 AM] Gunther Schadow says: should be positive. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [10:39:08 AM] Grahame Grieve says: it would seem that we should have a constraint that GLIST.denominator.isZero.not | ||
+ | [10:39:48 AM] Grahame Grieve says: and GLIST.denominator.notNull |
Latest revision as of 23:40, 23 May 2007
Broken GSLIST reference
There is a reference to the type GSLIST in the abstract specification.
Fix it -> change to GLIST
What's a GSLIST? A GuntherSchadowList? I think it's a typo and means GLIST or SLIST? Gschadow 10:38, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
yes that's right.
[10:25:36 AM] Grahame Grieve says: so, can GLIST.increment be negative?
[10:26:09 AM] Gunther Schadow says: would be a decrement :)
[10:26:24 AM] Gunther Schadow says: probably fine to say it should be positive.
[10:26:44 AM] Gunther Schadow says: should be positive.
[10:39:08 AM] Grahame Grieve says: it would seem that we should have a constraint that GLIST.denominator.isZero.not [10:39:48 AM] Grahame Grieve says: and GLIST.denominator.notNull