This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "ModuleMetadata FHIR Resource Proposal"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<div style="float: left;">[[Image:OpenHotTopic.GIF|35px| ]]</div>
 
<div style="float: left;">[[Image:OpenHotTopic.GIF|35px| ]]</div>
 
<div style="background:#F0F0F0">
 
<div style="background:#F0F0F0">
This page documents a [[:category:Pending FHIR Resource Proposal|Pending]] [[:category:FHIR Resource Proposal|FHIR Resource Proposal]]
+
This page documents a [[:category:Withdrawn FHIR Resource Proposal|Pending]] [[:category:FHIR Resource Proposal|FHIR Resource Proposal]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
[[Category:FHIR Resource Proposal]]
 
[[Category:FHIR Resource Proposal]]
[[Category:Pending FHIR Resource Proposal]]
+
[[Category:Withdrawn FHIR Resource Proposal]]
  
  
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
=ModuleMetadata=
 
=ModuleMetadata=
 +
 +
NOTE: This resource proposal has been withdrawn in favor of the following structure:
 +
 +
* [http://hl7.org/fhir/2016May/modulemetadata.html ModuleMetadata]
  
 
<!-- Resource names should meet the following characteristics:
 
<!-- Resource names should meet the following characteristics:

Latest revision as of 12:30, 4 April 2016



ModuleMetadata

NOTE: This resource proposal has been withdrawn in favor of the following structure:


The ModuleMetadata resource provides a structure for representing metadata that is common across quality improvement artifacts, including:

  • Artifact Identity, Versioning, and Lifecycle
  • Documentation and Supporting Evidence
  • Authorship, Stewardship, and Endorsement
  • Keyword/Topical Metadata

Owning committee name

Clinical Decision Support Work Group

Contributing or Reviewing Work Groups

FHIR Resource Development Project Insight ID

1187: FHIR-Based Clinical Decision Support (CDS-on-FHIR)

Scope of coverage

Various types of quality improvement artifacts share a common need to document metadata associated with the artifact. Rather than re-express this common information in each artifact resource, a separate resource is defined to allow this information to be referenced by the following artifact types:

  • Library
  • DecisionSupportServiceModule
  • DecisionSupportRule
  • DocumentationTemplate (Questionnaire)
  • OrderSet
  • Measure

RIM scope

Resource appropriateness

Expected implementations

Content sources

Example Scenarios

Resource Relationships

Timelines

gForge Users

brynrhodes