This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20150804 US Realm SC Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
===============================================================================---> | ===============================================================================---> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |Regrets|| Calvin Beebe || ||Keith Boone|| || Hans Buitendijk | + | |Regrets|| Calvin Beebe ||x||Keith Boone|| || Hans Buitendijk |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Lorraine Constable || ||Johnathan Coleman|| ||Ed Hammond | + | |x||Lorraine Constable || x||Johnathan Coleman||x ||Ed Hammond |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Tony Julian|| ||Paul Knapp|| ||Austin Kreisler | + | | ||Tony Julian|| x||Paul Knapp|| x||Austin Kreisler |
|- | |- | ||
| ||Ken McCaslin|| ||Brian Pech|| || John Quinn | | ||Ken McCaslin|| ||Brian Pech|| || John Quinn | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | x ||Pat Van Dyke||x ||Anne Wizauer||x||Sandra Stuart |
|- | |- | ||
| border="1" cellpadding="2" colspan="6" align="left"|'''Visitor / Name''' | | border="1" cellpadding="2" colspan="6" align="left"|'''Visitor / Name''' | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
Administrivia | Administrivia | ||
*Agenda review | *Agenda review | ||
| − | *Review notes from [[ | + | *Review notes from [[20150728_US_Realm_SC_Call]] |
*Action Items | *Action Items | ||
Discussion: | Discussion: | ||
*ONC Feedback to HL7 re: FHIR | *ONC Feedback to HL7 re: FHIR | ||
| − | |||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| + | *Called to order at 1:06 pm | ||
| + | *ONC Feedback to HL7 re: FHIR | ||
| + | **Johnathan reviews prepared slides with the issues that have been identified. | ||
| + | ***Timeline: what is the actual realistic target? Paul: will check on what best guesses are for real dates on FMG tomorrow. Lorraine: if all the issues can't be addressed by 8/31, can we triage them to the update? 8/31 is the deadline for changes to the core content. Discussion over the potential delay of ballots connected to DSTU 2 publishing. Anne to add to agenda for next week: FHIR timeline updates. | ||
| + | ***Can people still provide comments in gforge? Paul advises to put them in; Lorraine states the plan was to look at things on a case by case basis. Paul responds that decisions on issues are noted in the tracker items. | ||
| + | ***Overall process concerns: If something is put in gforge and addressed by a WG, tracker is closed but that doesn't mean the issue has actually been resolved. Discussion over roles of different groups in resolving these issues and breakdowns in communication. FGB/TSC should consider how we address this breakdown in the communication cycle. Keith Boone suggests WGs coordinating with their FMG liaison. Paul: there are issues with culture that we need mechanisms in place to counter. | ||
| + | *ACTIONS: | ||
| + | **Make FGB & TSC aware of the general issues to help balance them out. Ed will talk to Ken; Lorraine will take back to FGB. Part of this are symptoms of insufficient separation of duties. | ||
| + | ***Next issue: general architecture. Keith: the right people need to be signed up for the communication lists and they need to monitor the communications. Johnathan suggests mailing lists may not be the most effective communications. Ed: Argonaut group has had similar comments that communications are lacking. It might help if we had a page somewhere that describes to people the different ways they could be engaged in FHIR as an implementer, developer, interested party, balloter, etc. Johnathan: It would be helpful for the WGs too, not just outsiders. Paul: also we should direct them on how to escalate an issue if they are not satisfied with the process. Discussion over misunderstandings over the 80/20 concept. | ||
| + | *Adjourned at 1:59 pm | ||
| Line 94: | Line 103: | ||
| width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' '' | | width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' '' | ||
| − | * | + | *Ed to talk to Ken re: ONC concerns |
| + | *Lorraine to take ONC concerns to FGB | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 109: | Line 119: | ||
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
| − | *[[ | + | *[[20150811 US Realm SC Call]] Tuesday at 1 PM ET |
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:27, 6 August 2015
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee_Conference_Calls
| US Realm Steering Committee Call Agenda/Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2015-08-04 Time: 1 PM Eastern | ||
| Co-Chairs | Ed/Ken | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee / Name | |||||
| Regrets | Calvin Beebe | x | Keith Boone | Hans Buitendijk | |
| x | Lorraine Constable | x | Johnathan Coleman | x | Ed Hammond |
| Tony Julian | x | Paul Knapp | x | Austin Kreisler | |
| Ken McCaslin | Brian Pech | John Quinn | |||
| x | Pat Van Dyke | x | Anne Wizauer | x | Sandra Stuart |
| Visitor / Name | |||||
| no quorum definition | |||||
Agenda
Administrivia
- Agenda review
- Review notes from 20150728_US_Realm_SC_Call
- Action Items
Discussion:
- ONC Feedback to HL7 re: FHIR
Minutes
- Called to order at 1:06 pm
- ONC Feedback to HL7 re: FHIR
- Johnathan reviews prepared slides with the issues that have been identified.
- Timeline: what is the actual realistic target? Paul: will check on what best guesses are for real dates on FMG tomorrow. Lorraine: if all the issues can't be addressed by 8/31, can we triage them to the update? 8/31 is the deadline for changes to the core content. Discussion over the potential delay of ballots connected to DSTU 2 publishing. Anne to add to agenda for next week: FHIR timeline updates.
- Can people still provide comments in gforge? Paul advises to put them in; Lorraine states the plan was to look at things on a case by case basis. Paul responds that decisions on issues are noted in the tracker items.
- Overall process concerns: If something is put in gforge and addressed by a WG, tracker is closed but that doesn't mean the issue has actually been resolved. Discussion over roles of different groups in resolving these issues and breakdowns in communication. FGB/TSC should consider how we address this breakdown in the communication cycle. Keith Boone suggests WGs coordinating with their FMG liaison. Paul: there are issues with culture that we need mechanisms in place to counter.
- Johnathan reviews prepared slides with the issues that have been identified.
- ACTIONS:
- Make FGB & TSC aware of the general issues to help balance them out. Ed will talk to Ken; Lorraine will take back to FGB. Part of this are symptoms of insufficient separation of duties.
- Next issue: general architecture. Keith: the right people need to be signed up for the communication lists and they need to monitor the communications. Johnathan suggests mailing lists may not be the most effective communications. Ed: Argonaut group has had similar comments that communications are lacking. It might help if we had a page somewhere that describes to people the different ways they could be engaged in FHIR as an implementer, developer, interested party, balloter, etc. Johnathan: It would be helpful for the WGs too, not just outsiders. Paul: also we should direct them on how to escalate an issue if they are not satisfied with the process. Discussion over misunderstandings over the 80/20 concept.
- Make FGB & TSC aware of the general issues to help balance them out. Ed will talk to Ken; Lorraine will take back to FGB. Part of this are symptoms of insufficient separation of duties.
- Adjourned at 1:59 pm
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
