This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20150118 FGB FMG WGM Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
*Ballot timelines | *Ballot timelines | ||
− | + | Called to order at 12:58 pm | |
− | + | *Added two items to agenda: Argonaut and Ballot timelines. | |
− | + | *Went over schedule and objectives for the week. | |
− | + | *Key ballot issues mostly revolved around consistency. | |
− | + | *Comment submissions - difficulty getting them to show up correctly into gforge. | |
− | + | *QA may be an issue for many WGs who haven't had time to look at it due to accelerated work timelines. | |
− | + | *Key thing by the end of the week is to communicate what we'll need from people for the next cycle. | |
− | * | + | *Q4 on Thursday we'll be defining plans. We can say we're going to proceed with May ballot and the expectation is that all change requests will be applied or deferred and all QA will be done. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 19:23, 18 January 2015
HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: |
Date: 2015-01-18 Time: 12:30 PM U.S. Central | |
Chair: | Note taker(s):Anne W. |
Quorum = chair + 4 | yes/no | |||||
Co chairs | Regrets | David Hay | x | Lloyd McKenzie | ||
ex-officio | Woody Beeler, Dave Shaver FGB Co-chairs |
. | John Quinn, CTO |
Members | Members | Members | Observers/Guests | ||||
Hans Buitendijk | x | Brian Postlethwaite | x | Paul Knapp | x | Anne Wizauer, scribe | |
Josh Mandel | John Moehrke | x | Brian Pech | ||||
Regrets | Grahame Grieve | x | Lorraine Constable | x | Ewout Kramer | ||
x | Marten Smits,visitor | x | Rien Wertheim,visitor | x | Mary Kay McDaniel, visitor | ||
. | . | . |
Agenda
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- Key ballot issues
- Comment submission process
- Objectives for the week
- Argonaut
- Ballot timelines
Called to order at 12:58 pm
- Added two items to agenda: Argonaut and Ballot timelines.
- Went over schedule and objectives for the week.
- Key ballot issues mostly revolved around consistency.
- Comment submissions - difficulty getting them to show up correctly into gforge.
- QA may be an issue for many WGs who haven't had time to look at it due to accelerated work timelines.
- Key thing by the end of the week is to communicate what we'll need from people for the next cycle.
- Q4 on Thursday we'll be defining plans. We can say we're going to proceed with May ballot and the expectation is that all change requests will be applied or deferred and all QA will be done.