This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 19 June 2014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Michael tan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Health Concern Topic= '''Patient Care WG''' '''June 19, 2014''' ==Attendees== *Michael Tan – Chair *Elaine Ayres – Scribe *Stephen Chu *Becky Angeles *Kevin Coonan *Zac ...") |
Michael tan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
#Jay has a draft of models - Kevin would like to become involved at this point. | #Jay has a draft of models - Kevin would like to become involved at this point. | ||
#Review of the DAM – specifically additions made by Stephen. | #Review of the DAM – specifically additions made by Stephen. | ||
| − | #Discussion of “Problem Concern Act in C-CDA R2.0” | + | ##Discussion of “Problem Concern Act in C-CDA R2.0” |
| − | ##Relate to C-CDA – compare and contrast | + | ###Relate to C-CDA – compare and contrast |
###Bring forward harmonization recommendations to SDWG | ###Bring forward harmonization recommendations to SDWG | ||
#Review of identification data types that can be used – Kevin will provide. | #Review of identification data types that can be used – Kevin will provide. | ||
#A list of data elements is the first step to developing a model – then can consider a harmonization. | #A list of data elements is the first step to developing a model – then can consider a harmonization. | ||
#Review of UML models developed by Jay in a draft form. Has not totally mapped to current V3 model. Jay will review all of the use cases and complete the initial class diagram. | #Review of UML models developed by Jay in a draft form. Has not totally mapped to current V3 model. Jay will review all of the use cases and complete the initial class diagram. | ||
| − | #Compare against V3 | + | #Others invited to review the UML models and send comments to Michael |
| + | ##Compare against V3 | ||
##Compare against C-CDA | ##Compare against C-CDA | ||
| − | ##Compare against | + | ##Compare against Contsys? |
##Question – move to weekly calls to prepare for ballot? Yes – begin weekly calls. | ##Question – move to weekly calls to prepare for ballot? Yes – begin weekly calls. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
#Post class diagrams on wiki. | #Post class diagrams on wiki. | ||
#Looking at tracking identification mechanisms in the model | #Looking at tracking identification mechanisms in the model | ||
| + | #Organize weekly calls until DAM submission. | ||
Revision as of 08:20, 20 June 2014
Health Concern Topic
Patient Care WG June 19, 2014
Attendees
- Michael Tan – Chair
- Elaine Ayres – Scribe
- Stephen Chu
- Becky Angeles
- Kevin Coonan
- Zac Whitewood-Moores
- Su
- Laura Heermann Langford
- Jay Lyle
Minutes
- Minutes from May 22, 2014 -
- Minutes from June 4, 2014 - Move: Stephen/Elaine Abstain: 1 No: 1 Yes: 5
- NIB completed
- Jay has a draft of models - Kevin would like to become involved at this point.
- Review of the DAM – specifically additions made by Stephen.
- Discussion of “Problem Concern Act in C-CDA R2.0”
- Relate to C-CDA – compare and contrast
- Bring forward harmonization recommendations to SDWG
- Discussion of “Problem Concern Act in C-CDA R2.0”
- Review of identification data types that can be used – Kevin will provide.
- A list of data elements is the first step to developing a model – then can consider a harmonization.
- Review of UML models developed by Jay in a draft form. Has not totally mapped to current V3 model. Jay will review all of the use cases and complete the initial class diagram.
- Others invited to review the UML models and send comments to Michael
- Compare against V3
- Compare against C-CDA
- Compare against Contsys?
- Question – move to weekly calls to prepare for ballot? Yes – begin weekly calls.
==Actions==–
- Initial content due - July 13 for V3 models.
- Post class diagrams on wiki.
- Looking at tracking identification mechanisms in the model
- Organize weekly calls until DAM submission.
