This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20140602 FGB concall"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
*Action Item review: | *Action Item review: | ||
**Follow up with Provider candidate Catherine; | **Follow up with Provider candidate Catherine; | ||
− | **dave & woody review ‘principles of FHIR doc’ in next 2 days | + | **dave & woody review ‘principles of FHIR doc’ in next 2 days (woody "ok") |
**pass to FMG by week end for their review by tuesday am (before next FMG meeting | **pass to FMG by week end for their review by tuesday am (before next FMG meeting | ||
** Lynn will draft summary position on conformance testing of FHIR for review and adoption of a formal response | ** Lynn will draft summary position on conformance testing of FHIR for review and adoption of a formal response | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
***While conformance to the FHIR DSTU in terms of "shalls" and "shoulds" would be a useful exercise, any certification of conformance is not meaningful if the specification to which they have conformed is fully optional. | ***While conformance to the FHIR DSTU in terms of "shalls" and "shoulds" would be a useful exercise, any certification of conformance is not meaningful if the specification to which they have conformed is fully optional. | ||
*Updates to [[Fundamental_Principles_of_FHIR]] (review and set plan to formally adopt) | *Updates to [[Fundamental_Principles_of_FHIR]] (review and set plan to formally adopt) | ||
+ | * '''Issues passed down from TSC''' | ||
+ | **Governance Issues in re FHIR Registry - particularly: | ||
+ | ***Distinction between registering an item onto an open list vs. Assigning identifiers and registering their assignment | ||
+ | ***: | ||
+ | ***Determine whether HL7, in instituting charges for the OID registry, means to include a fee for retrieving registrations from the registry, or only for adding items thereto. And, if the latter wjat is the intended distinction between: "internal" addition requests, "member" addition requests, and "outside" addition requests? | ||
+ | :*** | ||
+ | ***Built-in protections against BOT submissions | ||
+ | ***: | ||
+ | ***Expectations for "automated curation" surrounding elements that carry identifiers in HL7-managed namespaces, particularly '''uri: http://hl7.org/fhir ...''' and '''OIDs: 2.16.840.1.113883... ''' | ||
*Updates to [[FHIR_Governance_Precepts]] | *Updates to [[FHIR_Governance_Precepts]] | ||
*FMG update - | *FMG update - | ||
Line 52: | Line 61: | ||
*Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes. | *Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes. | ||
*#Conformity Assessment | *#Conformity Assessment | ||
− | |||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== |
Revision as of 17:38, 2 June 2014
HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2014-06-03 Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso |
Quorum = Chair plus 2 | yes/no | ||||||
Co-Chair/CTO | Members | ||||||
George (Woody) Beeler | Lorraine Constable | Grahame Grieve | David Hay | ||||
Dave Shaver | Ewout Kramer | Lloyd McKenzie (FMG) | Ron Parker | ||||
John Quinn | |||||||
observers/guests | Austin Kreisler | ||||||
Lynn Laakso, scribe | |||||||
Agenda
- Roll call -
- Agenda Review
- Approve minutes of 20140526 FGB concall
- Action Item review:
- Follow up with Provider candidate Catherine;
- dave & woody review ‘principles of FHIR doc’ in next 2 days (woody "ok")
- pass to FMG by week end for their review by tuesday am (before next FMG meeting
- Lynn will draft summary position on conformance testing of FHIR for review and adoption of a formal response
- FGB is reluctant to see FHIR DSTU prototypes be used to grant certificates rather than serving to define and guide development of full conformance testing in future.
- FHIR's fundamental principle of scalability infers that conformance must be to a constrained scope in a wide range of interoperability spaces
- environment (within a small clinic to across a country or around the world)
- implementation environments (institutional, community, home health, etc.)
- architectures (centralized/distributed, open/closed, tight/loose)
- data loads (sms communication in the developing world to gigabyte/terrabyte EHR data dumps)
- communication frequencies (daily/weekly updates to sub-second automated device data updates)
- While conformance to the FHIR DSTU in terms of "shalls" and "shoulds" would be a useful exercise, any certification of conformance is not meaningful if the specification to which they have conformed is fully optional.
- Updates to Fundamental_Principles_of_FHIR (review and set plan to formally adopt)
- Issues passed down from TSC
- Governance Issues in re FHIR Registry - particularly:
- Distinction between registering an item onto an open list vs. Assigning identifiers and registering their assignment
- Determine whether HL7, in instituting charges for the OID registry, means to include a fee for retrieving registrations from the registry, or only for adding items thereto. And, if the latter wjat is the intended distinction between: "internal" addition requests, "member" addition requests, and "outside" addition requests?
- Distinction between registering an item onto an open list vs. Assigning identifiers and registering their assignment
- Governance Issues in re FHIR Registry - particularly:
- Built-in protections against BOT submissions
- Expectations for "automated curation" surrounding elements that carry identifiers in HL7-managed namespaces, particularly uri: http://hl7.org/fhir ... and OIDs: 2.16.840.1.113883...
- Built-in protections against BOT submissions
- Updates to FHIR_Governance_Precepts
- FMG update -
- Methodology update-
- Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes.
- Conformity Assessment
Minutes
Convened at
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
Back to FHIR_Governance_Board
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.