This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Bolus"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(question about documentation of alternate definition)
m
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
*T: "a series of responses sent at the same time without use of batch formatting" (to quote the definition from HL7 versions 2.4 and 2.5, in both Appendix A and chapter 5. It is defined identically in chapter 5 of version 2.6. The term bolus does not appear in versions 2.2, 2.3, or 2.3.1.)
 
*T: "a series of responses sent at the same time without use of batch formatting" (to quote the definition from HL7 versions 2.4 and 2.5, in both Appendix A and chapter 5. It is defined identically in chapter 5 of version 2.6. The term bolus does not appear in versions 2.2, 2.3, or 2.3.1.)
Suggestion was made by a former InM co-chair that responses would be sent as if they were ''unsollicited'' messages, which is radically different (from a dynamic model aspect) than ''a series of responses''.  
+
Suggestion was made by Mark Tucker (a former InM co-chair) that responses would be sent as if they were ''unsollicited'' messages, which is radically different (from a dynamic model aspect) than ''a series of responses''.  
  
 
The other options are:
 
The other options are:

Revision as of 15:19, 13 September 2006

"Bolus" is one of the current v2/v3 methods of responding to a query.

  • T: "a series of responses sent at the same time without use of batch formatting" (to quote the definition from HL7 versions 2.4 and 2.5, in both Appendix A and chapter 5. It is defined identically in chapter 5 of version 2.6. The term bolus does not appear in versions 2.2, 2.3, or 2.3.1.)

Suggestion was made by Mark Tucker (a former InM co-chair) that responses would be sent as if they were unsollicited messages, which is radically different (from a dynamic model aspect) than a series of responses.

The other options are:

The problem is that one interaction results in multiple response interactions. This is not valid under the current Dynamic Model, it could be supported using the proposed CPM.

Question: are there use-cases for this? If not, we should probably drop this option.

Question: is there documentation anywhere that supports the definition Mark put forward about responses being sent as if they were unsolicited messages?