This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20140401 arb minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Agenda) |
m (→Minutes) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
--> | --> | ||
=ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)= | =ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)= | ||
− | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
#Call to order | #Call to order | ||
#Roll Call | #Roll Call | ||
#Approval of Agenda and [[20140325_arb_minutes | Minutes]] | #Approval of Agenda and [[20140325_arb_minutes | Minutes]] | ||
+ | #Methodology (30 minutes) | ||
+ | ##BAM sections Review: | ||
+ | ###[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fdocuments%2Fbam_section_7_business_architecture.docx&view=log Section 7 Business Architecture] Bo, Ron, Jane | ||
+ | ###[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fdocuments%2Fbam_section_8_implementation.docx&view=log Section 8 Implementation] Lorraine | ||
+ | ###[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fdocuments%2Fbam_section_6_organizational_Precepts.docx&view=log Section 6 Organizational Precepts] | ||
+ | ####Tony has suggestions to review. | ||
+ | ####Waiting on chapters 6 and 7 | ||
#Management | #Management | ||
##Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=691 to-do list] | ##Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=691 to-do list] | ||
Line 25: | Line 31: | ||
##Report from Architecture Project | ##Report from Architecture Project | ||
#Governance | #Governance | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
#Other business and planning | #Other business and planning | ||
#Adjournment | #Adjournment | ||
Line 39: | Line 38: | ||
| width="50%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes''' <br/> | | width="50%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes''' <br/> | ||
'''Location: [[20100722_arb_minutes#logistics| Telcon]]''' | '''Location: [[20100722_arb_minutes#logistics| Telcon]]''' | ||
− | | width="50%" colspan="3" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: | + | | width="50%" colspan="3" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date:20140401<br/> '''Time: 5:00pm U.S. Eastern''' |
|- | |- | ||
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator''' | | width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator''' | ||
− | | width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony | + | | width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] |
| width="25%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)''' | | width="25%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)''' | ||
− | | width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] | + | | width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] |
|- | |- | ||
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | | border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | ||
Line 52: | Line 51: | ||
|colspan="2"|'''Affiliation''' | |colspan="2"|'''Affiliation''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||Bond,Andy |
|colspan="2"|NEHTA | |colspan="2"|NEHTA | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]] |
|colspan="2"|Constable Consulting Inc. | |colspan="2"|Constable Consulting Inc. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |R||[[User:Janecurry|Curry, Jane]] |
|colspan="2"|Health Information Strategies | |colspan="2"|Health Information Strategies | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||Dagnall, Bo |
|colspan="2"|HP Enterprise Services | |colspan="2"|HP Enterprise Services | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 67: | Line 66: | ||
|colspan="2"| U.S. Department of Defense, Military Health System | |colspan="2"| U.S. Department of Defense, Military Health System | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] |
|colspan="2"|Mayo Clinic | |colspan="2"|Mayo Clinic | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 79: | Line 78: | ||
|colspan="2"|Deontik Pty Ltd | |colspan="2"|Deontik Pty Ltd | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||[[User:Rongparker | Parker, Ron]] |
|colspan="2"|CA Infoway | |colspan="2"|CA Infoway | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 85: | Line 84: | ||
|colspan="2"|Health Level Seven, Inc. | |colspan="2"|Health Level Seven, Inc. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |R||Stechishin,Andy |
|colspan="2"|CANA Software and Service Ltd. | |colspan="2"|CANA Software and Service Ltd. | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 130: | Line 129: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
+ | #Minutes and agenda | ||
+ | ##'''Motion''' to approve agenda and minutes(Lorraine/Ron) | ||
+ | ##'''Vote''' 2-0-2 | ||
+ | #Business Architecture | ||
+ | ##FGB new cochairs dave shaver, Woody Beeler, new member Lorraine | ||
+ | ##No progress to date | ||
+ | ##Ron and Lorraine will be meeting to get closure and follup review session on wednesday thursday of next week. | ||
+ | #Implementation still waiting on 7. | ||
+ | ##Organizational Precepts | ||
+ | ###The HL7 ???has responsibility for enforcement of the policies and procedures expressed in the HL7 Governance and Operations Manual (GOM) | ||
+ | ###The HL7 GOM delegates to the HL7 TSC (9.01) | ||
+ | ####Establishing and maintaining an HL7 Architecture, development methodologies, and work processes to be used by The Working Group in developing HL7 protocol specifications | ||
+ | #### Ensuring that the efforts of The Working Group to produce protocol specifications proceeds at a reasonable pace | ||
+ | #### Ensuring that The Working Group collaborates smoothly and covers the scope of work in a consistent manner. | ||
+ | #### Managing the ballot and distribution process for those HL7 Protocol Specifications identified by the Executive Committee as intended to be freely available to the public. | ||
+ | ###The HL7 TSC may delegate the above authorities to the Governance, Management, or Methodology oversight groups while retaining final responsibility. | ||
+ | ###The governance oversight committee is responsible for | ||
+ | ####Establishing goals for the product line/family | ||
+ | ####Ensuring that changes to the product line/family meet the goals for the product line/family | ||
+ | ####Establishes the methodology group | ||
+ | ####Establish the management group | ||
+ | ###The management oversight committee is responsible for | ||
+ | ####All planning aspects of product line/family changes | ||
+ | ####Assessing and approving proposals | ||
+ | ####Assessing and approving publishing requests | ||
+ | ####Assessing and approving ballot requests | ||
+ | ####Creating Product Recommendations | ||
+ | ###The methodology oversight committee is responsible for the processes and working artifacts, e.g. | ||
+ | ####Creating concept proposals | ||
+ | ####Creating concept artifacts | ||
+ | ####Creating examples | ||
+ | ####Domain definitions | ||
+ | ####Conformance Criteria | ||
+ | ###There should be a vitality assessment process | ||
+ | ###Managemement group asserts the precepts for the group. | ||
+ | ####Typical consequence: If a review required is not made, the process stops. | ||
+ | ###Each governance precept should include a noun, verb, and consequence. | ||
+ | ###Do we provide enough guidance to do it productively, or at all | ||
+ | ####Methodology is responsibility for processes and working artifacts for example | ||
+ | #####Proposals, | ||
+ | ####GOM 02.01 | ||
+ | ####The whole idea is coherence and traceability. | ||
+ | ####Ken is mulling the idea of a single governance group | ||
+ | #####Bo is concerned that the BAM is dead because of the long-running which is not yet done. Can we get to that point. | ||
+ | #####Ron: we can nail down the first stages. Once this is done we can work out the details. | ||
+ | ###ISSUE: GOM 02.01 Comprehensive Framework | ||
+ | <pre>The Modeling and Methodology Work Group shall undertake the development and maintenance of a | ||
+ | comprehensive standards development framework to define, clarify, and delineate the processes | ||
+ | employed by HL7. The framework shall address at least common processes, standards specific | ||
+ | processes, and support and governance processes in sufficient detail to act as a guide to those new | ||
+ | to the HL7 process and provide checkpoints to those involved in the process. The comprehensive | ||
+ | framework may be promulgated as a standard in order to promote the good practices inherent in the | ||
+ | HL7 process.</pre> | ||
− | + | ###Adjournment 6:00pm U.S. Eastern [[Category:2014 Arb Minutes]] | |
− | [[Category:2014 Arb Minutes]] |
Latest revision as of 19:17, 2 April 2014
ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)
Agenda
- Call to order
- Roll Call
- Approval of Agenda and Minutes
- Methodology (30 minutes)
- BAM sections Review:
- Section 7 Business Architecture Bo, Ron, Jane
- Section 8 Implementation Lorraine
- Section 6 Organizational Precepts
- Tony has suggestions to review.
- Waiting on chapters 6 and 7
- BAM sections Review:
- Management
- Review to-do list
- Review/update Arb BAM task list
- Report from Architecture Project
- Governance
- Other business and planning
- Adjournment
Meeting Information
HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon |
Date:20140401 Time: 5:00pm U.S. Eastern | |||||
Facilitator | Julian, Tony | Note taker(s) | Julian, Tony | |||
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | ||||
X | Bond,Andy | NEHTA | ||||
X | Constable, Lorraine | Constable Consulting Inc. | ||||
R | Curry, Jane | Health Information Strategies | ||||
X | Dagnall, Bo | HP Enterprise Services | ||||
. | Hufnagel, Steve | U.S. Department of Defense, Military Health System | ||||
X | Julian, Tony | Mayo Clinic | ||||
. | Loyd, Patrick | ICode Solutions | ||||
. | Lynch, Cecil | Accenture | ||||
. | Milosevic, Zoran | Deontik Pty Ltd | ||||
X | Parker, Ron | CA Infoway | ||||
. | Quinn, John | Health Level Seven, Inc. | ||||
R | Stechishin,Andy | CANA Software and Service Ltd. | ||||
. | Guests | |||||
. | Kreisler, Austin | HL7 TSC Chair | ||||
. | Luthra, Anil | NCI | ||||
. | Pech, Brian | Kaiser Permanente | ||||
. | Shakir, Abdul Malik | City of Hope National Medical Center | ||||
. | Laakso, Lynn | HL7 | ||||
. | ||||||
. | Legend | |||||
X | Present | |||||
. | Absent | |||||
R | Regrets | |||||
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair + 3) Met: Yes |
Minutes
- Minutes and agenda
- Motion to approve agenda and minutes(Lorraine/Ron)
- Vote 2-0-2
- Business Architecture
- FGB new cochairs dave shaver, Woody Beeler, new member Lorraine
- No progress to date
- Ron and Lorraine will be meeting to get closure and follup review session on wednesday thursday of next week.
- Implementation still waiting on 7.
- Organizational Precepts
- The HL7 ???has responsibility for enforcement of the policies and procedures expressed in the HL7 Governance and Operations Manual (GOM)
- The HL7 GOM delegates to the HL7 TSC (9.01)
- Establishing and maintaining an HL7 Architecture, development methodologies, and work processes to be used by The Working Group in developing HL7 protocol specifications
- Ensuring that the efforts of The Working Group to produce protocol specifications proceeds at a reasonable pace
- Ensuring that The Working Group collaborates smoothly and covers the scope of work in a consistent manner.
- Managing the ballot and distribution process for those HL7 Protocol Specifications identified by the Executive Committee as intended to be freely available to the public.
- The HL7 TSC may delegate the above authorities to the Governance, Management, or Methodology oversight groups while retaining final responsibility.
- The governance oversight committee is responsible for
- Establishing goals for the product line/family
- Ensuring that changes to the product line/family meet the goals for the product line/family
- Establishes the methodology group
- Establish the management group
- The management oversight committee is responsible for
- All planning aspects of product line/family changes
- Assessing and approving proposals
- Assessing and approving publishing requests
- Assessing and approving ballot requests
- Creating Product Recommendations
- The methodology oversight committee is responsible for the processes and working artifacts, e.g.
- Creating concept proposals
- Creating concept artifacts
- Creating examples
- Domain definitions
- Conformance Criteria
- There should be a vitality assessment process
- Managemement group asserts the precepts for the group.
- Typical consequence: If a review required is not made, the process stops.
- Each governance precept should include a noun, verb, and consequence.
- Do we provide enough guidance to do it productively, or at all
- Methodology is responsibility for processes and working artifacts for example
- Proposals,
- GOM 02.01
- The whole idea is coherence and traceability.
- Ken is mulling the idea of a single governance group
- Bo is concerned that the BAM is dead because of the long-running which is not yet done. Can we get to that point.
- Ron: we can nail down the first stages. Once this is done we can work out the details.
- Methodology is responsibility for processes and working artifacts for example
- ISSUE: GOM 02.01 Comprehensive Framework
- Organizational Precepts
The Modeling and Methodology Work Group shall undertake the development and maintenance of a comprehensive standards development framework to define, clarify, and delineate the processes employed by HL7. The framework shall address at least common processes, standards specific processes, and support and governance processes in sufficient detail to act as a guide to those new to the HL7 process and provide checkpoints to those involved in the process. The comprehensive framework may be promulgated as a standard in order to promote the good practices inherent in the HL7 process.
- Adjournment 6:00pm U.S. Eastern