Difference between revisions of "OO CReDOS-005 Message Structure: Missing legends"
m (→Resolution) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category:OO | + | [[Category:OO Accepted eDOS IG Change Requests]] |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
| + | Discussed 2014-03-11 eDOS WG call. | ||
== Recommended Action Items == | == Recommended Action Items == | ||
Latest revision as of 20:45, 17 March 2014
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Eric Haas | Revision date: Jan 23 2014 |
| Submitted date: Jan 23 2014 | Change request ID: OO CReDOS-005 |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: Missing legends |
Issue
Missing legend for message structure section:
Recommendation
copy following from LOI and put in section 5 preamble:
"Note that the first column (Segment) is listing the cardinality and optionality according to the base standard; the second column (Name) provides the segment or group name from the base standard, while the remaining columns (Usage, Cardinality, Description) define the constraints for this implementation guide. It is therefore possible that the base standard defines a segment as “O” (optional) with a cardinality of up to 1, while this implementation guide defines the segment in the Usage column as “R” (required) thus a cardinality of [1..1]."
Rationale
Give Reader guidance on message structure tables.
Discussion
Discussed 2014-03-11 eDOS WG call.
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
2014-03-11 Motion: add the first two paragraphs from LRI(LOI) above the current section 5.1 in eDOS – Riki Merrick, Bob Yencha, no further discussion Vote: Against: 0, Abstain: 0, Affirmative: 9
