Difference between revisions of "February 04, 2014 CBCC Conference Call"
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|| [mailto:mjafari@edmondsci.com Mohammed Jafari] || | || [mailto:mjafari@edmondsci.com Mohammed Jafari] || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | [mailto:jim.kretz@samhsa.hhs.gov Jim Kretz]|| | + | | [mailto:jim.kretz@samhsa.hhs.gov Jim Kretz]|| x |
− | ||[mailto:mike@thenationalcouncil.org Mike Lardiere] || | + | ||[mailto:mike@thenationalcouncil.org Mike Lardiere] ||x |
|| [mailto:tleeper@odmhsas.org Tracy Leeper] || | || [mailto:tleeper@odmhsas.org Tracy Leeper] || | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida] ||. | | [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida] ||. | ||
||[mailto:Kathryn.Wetherby@samhsa.hhs.gov Kate Wetherby] ||x | ||[mailto:Kathryn.Wetherby@samhsa.hhs.gov Kate Wetherby] ||x | ||
− | ||[mailto:rgrow@technatomy.com Rick Grow]|| | + | ||[mailto:rgrow@technatomy.com Rick Grow]|| x |
|- | |- | ||
| [mailto:maryann.juurlink@gmail.com Maryann Juurlink] || | | [mailto:maryann.juurlink@gmail.com Maryann Juurlink] || | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
# ''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda | # ''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda | ||
# ''' New Project Scope Statement ''' - (to approve) Patient Friendly Language for Security and Privacy | # ''' New Project Scope Statement ''' - (to approve) Patient Friendly Language for Security and Privacy | ||
− | # '''Value Set''' Update - Ioana/ | + | # '''Value Set''' Update - Ioana/Wende |
− | # | + | # |
+ | ==Meeting Minutes '''DRAFT'''== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ioana: You can see that all the scenarios follow logic. It all has to do with exchanging healthcare records for people who have the access to see them. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ioana: It’s not dealing with a patient that needs Behavioral Health, treatment or counseling; it’s a program that deals with them in a rehabilitative way. We looked at flags to see if someone is suicidal, homicidal, etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kathleen: Ioana, the good news is that we agree. For the use cases that we have, we’re taking them directly from the paper. What we want to do is bring in those people who are experts, from criminal justice, care providers, etc. From what I’ve seen, there are so many people on the BH side who are adding a bunch of stuff. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ioana: The last thing is their consent to have their information released to the providers. There’s also a Criminal Risk Assessments that goes along with the information. The criminal risk and the uniform consent of release of information is part of the initial exchange between patient and provider. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Richard: You can imagine someone not getting out of prison because they don’t have the resources. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ioana: The assumption is that you have received care. They also want to know how many times you asked for care during the detention. | ||
− | + | Richard: Are there are any use cases where there is supervision by a parole officer? Essentially, we’re trying to put patients back on the street, but the healthcare system can’t entirely give up its supervisory responsibilities. | |
+ | |||
+ | Ioana: You could be in detention and still receive treatment in the community. They have a lot of scenarios where you’re planning for reentry, and then you’re going to send the information to the community-based providers. All the information is generated during incarceration. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Richard: You’re pretty sure they did not speak about structured data? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ioana: They don’t explain it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Richard: They want to write a novel, but nobody can deal with that. You’d think they’d be interested in structured data so people can do an analysis. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ioana: This model may not relate to reentry at all, but it seems like it would be subsequent to reentry. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Action Items: | ||
+ | |||
+ | None |
Latest revision as of 22:21, 5 February 2014
Contents
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information
Attendees
Member Name | Present | Member Name | Present | Member Name | Present |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | x | Max Walker CBCC Co-Chair | . |
Michael Alonso | Wende Baker | x | Bill Braithwaite, MD | . | |
Kathleen Connor | Daniel Crough | . | . | ||
Steve Eichner | Brian Handspicker | . | Mohammed Jafari | ||
Jim Kretz | x | Mike Lardiere | x | Tracy Leeper | |
Lisa Nelson | Diana Proud-Madruga | Harry Rhodes | |||
Ken Salyards | Lori Simon | Ioana Singureanu | x | ||
Tony Weida | . | Kate Wetherby | x | Rick Grow | x |
Maryann Juurlink | Steve Daviss | Neelima Chennamaraja | |||
Dina Passman | . | . |
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- New Project Scope Statement - (to approve) Patient Friendly Language for Security and Privacy
- Value Set Update - Ioana/Wende
Meeting Minutes DRAFT
Ioana: You can see that all the scenarios follow logic. It all has to do with exchanging healthcare records for people who have the access to see them.
Ioana: It’s not dealing with a patient that needs Behavioral Health, treatment or counseling; it’s a program that deals with them in a rehabilitative way. We looked at flags to see if someone is suicidal, homicidal, etc.
Kathleen: Ioana, the good news is that we agree. For the use cases that we have, we’re taking them directly from the paper. What we want to do is bring in those people who are experts, from criminal justice, care providers, etc. From what I’ve seen, there are so many people on the BH side who are adding a bunch of stuff.
Ioana: The last thing is their consent to have their information released to the providers. There’s also a Criminal Risk Assessments that goes along with the information. The criminal risk and the uniform consent of release of information is part of the initial exchange between patient and provider.
Richard: You can imagine someone not getting out of prison because they don’t have the resources.
Ioana: The assumption is that you have received care. They also want to know how many times you asked for care during the detention.
Richard: Are there are any use cases where there is supervision by a parole officer? Essentially, we’re trying to put patients back on the street, but the healthcare system can’t entirely give up its supervisory responsibilities.
Ioana: You could be in detention and still receive treatment in the community. They have a lot of scenarios where you’re planning for reentry, and then you’re going to send the information to the community-based providers. All the information is generated during incarceration.
Richard: You’re pretty sure they did not speak about structured data?
Ioana: They don’t explain it.
Richard: They want to write a novel, but nobody can deal with that. You’d think they’d be interested in structured data so people can do an analysis.
Ioana: This model may not relate to reentry at all, but it seems like it would be subsequent to reentry.
Action Items:
None