Difference between revisions of "October 08, 2013 Security WG Conference Call"
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]] | [[Security|Back to Security Main Page]] | ||
| − | ==Attendees== | + | ==Attendees== |
* Y - [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] | * Y - [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] | ||
* Y - [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] | * Y - [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] | ||
* [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair | * [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair | ||
| + | * Y - [mailto:bd@handspiker Brian Handspicker] | ||
* [mailto:r.gelzer@myfairpoint.net Reed Gelzer] | * [mailto:r.gelzer@myfairpoint.net Reed Gelzer] | ||
* Y - [mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair | * Y - [mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
* [mailto:trish.williams@ecu.edu.au Trish Williams] | * [mailto:trish.williams@ecu.edu.au Trish Williams] | ||
* [mailto:Harry.Rhodes@AHIMA.org Harry Rhodes] | * [mailto:Harry.Rhodes@AHIMA.org Harry Rhodes] | ||
| − | + | ||
| Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
#''(15 min)'' '''Ballot Reconciliation ''' HCS - review of latest | #''(15 min)'' '''Ballot Reconciliation ''' HCS - review of latest | ||
#''(15 min)'' '''FTSD approval link ''' | #''(15 min)'' '''FTSD approval link ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
#''(10 min)'' '''Other Business''' | #''(10 min)'' '''Other Business''' | ||
==Meeting Minutes== | ==Meeting Minutes== | ||
| − | '''Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda''' | + | '''Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda''' - No Security Chair present, meeting minutes not approved. |
| + | |||
| + | '''Ballot Reconciliation''' review | ||
| + | |||
| + | HCS - review of latest resolutions posted to ['''ADD LINK''': Latest HCS ballot reconciliation spreadsheet] | ||
| − | + | * for negative minors | |
| + | * 10, | ||
| + | * 13 (verbiage added), | ||
| + | * 12 (verbiage added), | ||
| + | * 14 (explanation added to commenter); | ||
| + | * 15, 16, | ||
| + | * 17 (discussion of break glass) | ||
| + | * 18 (comment author referred to specs) | ||
| + | * 19 (question answered) | ||
| + | * 20 (question answered) | ||
| + | * 21 (question answered) - reuse | ||
| + | * 22 (question answered) | ||
| + | * 23 (question answered) custodian, not subject | ||
| + | * 24 new examples will be brought over from DS4P with the correct new code | ||
| − | + | Remaining to do on reconciliation: | |
| + | * two questions from David Stumpf have not yet been answered | ||
| + | * items from John Moehrke are suggestions; have been reviewed (will attempt to do via e-mail) | ||
| + | * need to review with group new verbiage developed at the WGM for Clem | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' ''Ballot Reconciliation Vote has been postponed until next week when a Security Co-Chair is present'' ''' | ||
'''Linking FTSD approval of SLS SOA PSS''' | '''Linking FTSD approval of SLS SOA PSS''' | ||
| + | Note: October 8,2013 [http://tscwiki.hl7.org/wiki/index.php?title=FTSD-ConCall-20131008#Minutes FTSD conference call] have been posted | ||
| − | + | Approved at FTSD ConCall for SLS---Next steps in SLS effort. | |
| + | This is the next steps to take the HCS to the next level; HCS describes the syntax/semantics of the label but it does not describe how it is to be implemented. We are coming up with a functional standard in where to pass for audit and access control that would cover the SLS and in addition the use of the reasoner to decide what the clinical back part is and which labels need to placed on per policy. How to package and do the privacy protective mechanism. That's the next step in the effort and we have a great interest on the value sets (what Ioana is doing) (and also show value of the ontology) and which labels to use. | ||
| + | |||
| + | for Ioana: We will be placing the request to understand the scope and approvals of the application and confirm our cross-references between DS4P and HCS. | ||
| + | Meeting adjourned at 1435 | ||
| − | + | --[[User:Suzannegw|Suzannegw]] 21:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |
Latest revision as of 21:48, 8 October 2013
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Y - Johnathan Coleman
- Y - Kathleen Connor
- Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- Y - Brian Handspicker
- Reed Gelzer
- Y - Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- Don Jorgenson
- John Moehrke Security Co-chair
- Y - Diana Proud-Madruga
- Y - Ioana Singureanu
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- Tony Weida
- Trish Williams
- Harry Rhodes
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation HCS - review of latest
- (15 min) FTSD approval link
- (10 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda - No Security Chair present, meeting minutes not approved.
Ballot Reconciliation review
HCS - review of latest resolutions posted to [ADD LINK: Latest HCS ballot reconciliation spreadsheet]
- for negative minors
- 10,
- 13 (verbiage added),
- 12 (verbiage added),
- 14 (explanation added to commenter);
- 15, 16,
- 17 (discussion of break glass)
- 18 (comment author referred to specs)
- 19 (question answered)
- 20 (question answered)
- 21 (question answered) - reuse
- 22 (question answered)
- 23 (question answered) custodian, not subject
- 24 new examples will be brought over from DS4P with the correct new code
Remaining to do on reconciliation:
- two questions from David Stumpf have not yet been answered
- items from John Moehrke are suggestions; have been reviewed (will attempt to do via e-mail)
- need to review with group new verbiage developed at the WGM for Clem
Ballot Reconciliation Vote has been postponed until next week when a Security Co-Chair is present
Linking FTSD approval of SLS SOA PSS Note: October 8,2013 FTSD conference call have been posted
Approved at FTSD ConCall for SLS---Next steps in SLS effort. This is the next steps to take the HCS to the next level; HCS describes the syntax/semantics of the label but it does not describe how it is to be implemented. We are coming up with a functional standard in where to pass for audit and access control that would cover the SLS and in addition the use of the reasoner to decide what the clinical back part is and which labels need to placed on per policy. How to package and do the privacy protective mechanism. That's the next step in the effort and we have a great interest on the value sets (what Ioana is doing) (and also show value of the ontology) and which labels to use.
for Ioana: We will be placing the request to understand the scope and approvals of the application and confirm our cross-references between DS4P and HCS.
Meeting adjourned at 1435
--Suzannegw 21:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
