This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20130918 BAM Modeling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
===============================================================================---> | ===============================================================================---> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Calvin Beebe | + | |x || Calvin Beebe |
|- | |- | ||
| || Woody Beeler | | || Woody Beeler | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| || Tony Julian | | || Tony Julian | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Austin Kreisler, | + | |x || Austin Kreisler, |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Lynn Laakso | + | |x || Lynn Laakso |
|- | |- | ||
| || Cecil Lynch | | || Cecil Lynch | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Ron Parker | + | | x|| Ron Parker |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Brian Pech | + | |x || Brian Pech |
|- | |- | ||
| || Melva Peters | | || Melva Peters | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| − | + | *Agenda | |
| + | *BAM-lite - from ArB. Formalizing product focus, conceptual/logical/physical, traceable business requirements. Instead of formalizing the whole life cycle, just narrate the first three stages. They have most of the first two phases and almost ready for the third phase. They hope to turn it around within a month of the WGM. | ||
| + | **Changes to membership model making such a moving target. Trying to get it on the Board agenda will be difficult. They can ask for ½ hour on an upcoming call. | ||
| + | **Need to also review so many changes with membership with an eye to vitality triggers | ||
| + | **SDC issues of concern and need to think about using a content review team for any external work brought in before acceptance of a project. This was an original function of the ArB and ArB may need to have additional people added to help perform that task. Otherwise they may have to convene a panel of experts for the review if they experts don't have position on the ArB. Role of triggers , vitality assessment, and explicit risk assessment discussed. | ||
| + | **Need to have a process for a "sniff test" to recognize an external contribution's product family and may refer to ArB. Criteria on such contributions doesn't really exist. Brian notes that the HL7 domain and reach may have some concrete definitions. | ||
| + | **SDC will be discussed on today's US Realm call and will likely be required to adopt ISO Datatypes. | ||
| + | **WGM agenda for Weds Q3 - we will circle around to the BAM-lite so far | ||
| + | **PSS development for CDA R2 (R3?) IG Product Family. This has gone nowhere… CDA R3 will be a topic for the WGM. | ||
| + | **Continue discussion on [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7477/10813/%54%53%43%5f%4f%72%67%5f%43%68%61%72%74%5f%32%30%31%33%30%38%30%37%2e%76%73%64 model diagram] | ||
| + | *** Still seeking reconciliation of structure for Product Family/Product Line in existing Steering Divisions; individual product family governance groups, or one overall governance group. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adjourned 2:33 PM | ||
Latest revision as of 18:34, 18 September 2013
TSC representatives and ArB to jointly develop content for the BAM for the Product Line Architecture Program
| HL7 BAM Modeling Call Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2013-09-18 Time: 2 pm Eastern Time | ||
| Facilitator | Austin Kreisler | Note taker(s) | Lynn |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| x | Calvin Beebe | ||
| Woody Beeler | |||
| Jane Curry | |||
| Bo Dagnall | |||
| Jean Duteau, | |||
| Tony Julian | |||
| x | Austin Kreisler, | ||
| x | Lynn Laakso | ||
| Cecil Lynch | |||
| x | Ron Parker | ||
| x | Brian Pech | ||
| Melva Peters | |||
| no quorum definition | |||
Agenda
- Agenda
- WGM agenda for Weds Q3
- Other planning for WGM
- PSS development for CDA R2 (R3?) IG Product Family.
- Continue discussion on model diagram
Minutes
- Agenda
- BAM-lite - from ArB. Formalizing product focus, conceptual/logical/physical, traceable business requirements. Instead of formalizing the whole life cycle, just narrate the first three stages. They have most of the first two phases and almost ready for the third phase. They hope to turn it around within a month of the WGM.
- Changes to membership model making such a moving target. Trying to get it on the Board agenda will be difficult. They can ask for ½ hour on an upcoming call.
- Need to also review so many changes with membership with an eye to vitality triggers
- SDC issues of concern and need to think about using a content review team for any external work brought in before acceptance of a project. This was an original function of the ArB and ArB may need to have additional people added to help perform that task. Otherwise they may have to convene a panel of experts for the review if they experts don't have position on the ArB. Role of triggers , vitality assessment, and explicit risk assessment discussed.
- Need to have a process for a "sniff test" to recognize an external contribution's product family and may refer to ArB. Criteria on such contributions doesn't really exist. Brian notes that the HL7 domain and reach may have some concrete definitions.
- SDC will be discussed on today's US Realm call and will likely be required to adopt ISO Datatypes.
- WGM agenda for Weds Q3 - we will circle around to the BAM-lite so far
- PSS development for CDA R2 (R3?) IG Product Family. This has gone nowhere… CDA R3 will be a topic for the WGM.
- Continue discussion on model diagram
- Still seeking reconciliation of structure for Product Family/Product Line in existing Steering Divisions; individual product family governance groups, or one overall governance group.
Adjourned 2:33 PM
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
