This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "June 4, 2013 Security Working Group Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* [mailto:bill.braithwaite@equifax.com Bill Braithwaite] | * [mailto:bill.braithwaite@equifax.com Bill Braithwaite] | ||
− | * [mailto: Johnathan Coleman] | + | * [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] |
* [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] | * [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] | ||
* [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair | * [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair | ||
− | * [mailto: Brian Handspicker], NY ITS | + | * [mailto:Brian.Handspicker@its.ny.gov Brian Handspicker], NY ITS |
* [mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair | * [mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair | ||
* [mailto: Mohammad Jafari] | * [mailto: Mohammad Jafari] | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Meeting Minutes== | ==Meeting Minutes== | ||
'''Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda''' | '''Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda''' | ||
− | * 5/28 meeting minutes will be approved at next meeting | + | * 5/28 meeting minutes will be approved at next meeting |
'''Review of Security and Privacy Ontology ''' -Tony Weida | '''Review of Security and Privacy Ontology ''' -Tony Weida | ||
− | * Suggestion for Resolution of Weida Comments | + | * Suggestion for Resolution of Weida Comments <<add link to ballot reconciliation sheet>> |
− | + | ||
− | + | WG discussion of negative majors during future meetings in this order: | |
+ | * Agreement made on planned steps to reconcile John’s and my remaining comments as outlined below. | ||
+ | * WG discussion of negative majors during future meetings in this order: | ||
+ | ** Comment 51 was resolved as persuasive. | ||
+ | ** Comment 55: WG review and agreement on conformance statements in the sections covering specific sub-ontologies. | ||
+ | ** Comment 58: Resolve name collisions between classes derived from CSP-DAM and from root classes in HL7 vocabularies. | ||
+ | ** Comment 48: Spell out use of OWL logical constructs to formulate policies. | ||
+ | ** Comment 60: Refine operation hierarchy (see also Comment 18). | ||
+ | ** Block vote on the draft resolutions of the negative minors (after any discussion requested by WG members). | ||
+ | * Block vote on the draft resolutions of the affirmatives (after any discussion requested by WG members). | ||
+ | * Continued discussion of Comment 17 on the Clinical Condition sub-ontology, and proposed resolution TBD in consideration of the HCS approach. | ||
'''Ballot Reconciliation for HCS''' - Kathleen | '''Ballot Reconciliation for HCS''' - Kathleen | ||
+ | |||
<<add link to ballot reconciliation sheet>> | <<add link to ballot reconciliation sheet>> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:38, 7 June 2013
Contents
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Bill Braithwaite
- Johnathan Coleman
- Kathleen Connor
- Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- Brian Handspicker, NY ITS
- Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- [mailto: Mohammad Jafari]
- Adrianne James
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- Tony Weida
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda (
- (15 min) Review of Security and Privacy Ontology -Tony Weida
- (15 min) Item2
- (15 min) Item3
- (05 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- 5/28 meeting minutes will be approved at next meeting
Review of Security and Privacy Ontology -Tony Weida
- Suggestion for Resolution of Weida Comments <<add link to ballot reconciliation sheet>>
WG discussion of negative majors during future meetings in this order:
- Agreement made on planned steps to reconcile John’s and my remaining comments as outlined below.
- WG discussion of negative majors during future meetings in this order:
- Comment 51 was resolved as persuasive.
- Comment 55: WG review and agreement on conformance statements in the sections covering specific sub-ontologies.
- Comment 58: Resolve name collisions between classes derived from CSP-DAM and from root classes in HL7 vocabularies.
- Comment 48: Spell out use of OWL logical constructs to formulate policies.
- Comment 60: Refine operation hierarchy (see also Comment 18).
- Block vote on the draft resolutions of the negative minors (after any discussion requested by WG members).
- Block vote on the draft resolutions of the affirmatives (after any discussion requested by WG members).
- Continued discussion of Comment 17 on the Clinical Condition sub-ontology, and proposed resolution TBD in consideration of the HCS approach.
Ballot Reconciliation for HCS - Kathleen
<<add link to ballot reconciliation sheet>>
Item3
Other Business