This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20130508 FMG WGM meeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no''' | |colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Co chairs||X||Hugh Glover|| | | + | | Co chairs||X||Hugh Glover||X||Lloyd McKenzie |
|- | |- | ||
| ex-officio|| ||Ron Parker, FGB Chair||.||John Quinn, CTO | | ex-officio|| ||Ron Parker, FGB Chair||.||John Quinn, CTO | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests | | colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | ||Lorraine Constable || ||John Moehrke || ||Lynn Laakso, scribe |
|- | |- | ||
|X||Jean Duteau ||X||Brian Pech || || Austin Kreisler | |X||Jean Duteau ||X||Brian Pech || || Austin Kreisler |
Revision as of 03:21, 9 May 2013
HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: Georgia 8 |
Date: 2013-05-08 Time: 7:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
Chair: | Note taker(s): |
Quorum = chair + 4 | yes/no | |||||
Co chairs | X | Hugh Glover | X | Lloyd McKenzie | ||
ex-officio | Ron Parker, FGB Chair | . | John Quinn, CTO |
Members | Members | Observers/Guests | |||
Lorraine Constable | John Moehrke | Lynn Laakso, scribe | |||
X | Jean Duteau | X | Brian Pech | Austin Kreisler | |
X | David Hay | ||||
. |
Contents
Agenda
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- Minutes from 20130429_FMG_concall
- Administrative
- Action items
- Action items
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- FGB –
- MnM –
- FMG Liaisons –
- Resource Proposals
- Ballot Readiness
- QA process (previous & next)
- Sept WGM plans
- Community Building
- AOB (Any Other Business)
Minutes
Agenda Approval: David/Hugh unanimous
Connectathon Report
Pros
- Went well - filled the room (more than 20 people) - 28 max
- Several observers
- New people & returnees
- 2 remote participants (not ideal, better than nothing)
- 6 clients met 1 or more, 5 servers met 1 or more
- Vendors & organizations, not just individuals
- Seem to be building on previous ones
Cons
- Didn't successfully get 3 streams running
- Didn't get scenarios or data defined early enough
- Didn't really "demonstrate" what was done - do we need more of a showcase?
Future
- Perhaps put together a "build FHIR in a day" tutorial/set of instructions
- Look at driving scenarios off list of use-cases [[1]]
- Put connectathon on the Tutorial list?
- Eventually we want to charge real money. Perhaps next time charge $50 or something/participant
- partially cover food
- encourage participation & commitment
- perhaps adjust fees in the future - if you certify, you pay less next time?
- Connectathon coming up in Australia, possibly Europe
- Need announcment in HL7 notice
- Article in HL7 Newsletter, including announcement of upcoming future connectathons & where
- This connectathon will be last opportunity to try specification before DSTU is finalized
- Content will be frozen at ballot - need to ensure the servers are ready at the same time.
- Aim for 30+ attendees, round tables
FGB report
- Discussed vitality process
- Grahame provided stats on resource access - resources + date
- Start capturing IP address, user's name, operation, search parameters
- Ewout agrees to capture stats too - will coordinate w/ Grahame on format
- Discussed process for donating resources
- Still an open issue for the board to deal with IP issues around submissions (internal and external)
- Will allow for externally-defined resources in a way to ensure no collisions and encourage community-participation
MnM
Working on methodology
Community
- Consideration of using Stack Overflow or something like that?
- Benefit to using the public forum
- increased public view
- May be too hard to get the focus narrow enough to be useful
- Dave will add a wiki-page
Resource Proposals
- Lloyd will send a reminder to the WGs indicating what resources are missing proposals and requesting proposals to be complete by a deadline (say 2 weeks Monday)
- Will include examples
- Lloyd will distribute the Core resources to members of FMG and FGB (probably ~ 2 each), same deadline for completion
- Will devote a large chunk of time to reviewing proposals on future calls
Ballot Readiness
- Some WGs doing well, others not so well
- May need to move content for FM into "Core owned"
- Pharmacy - ready
- PA - Patient, Organization ready, but for all - November
- Will re-factor approach to get "enough" review done by mid-July
- FM - "ready enough"
- PHER - ready
- OO - ready
- PC - ready
- Devices - ready or yanked
- New security stuff - ready
QA
- Process worked really well 22 participants, 16 actually did some (many all) of review
- Vocab has agreed to undertake a QA process that involves vetting chunks at a time (once we deem them ready for review)
- Lloyd will be putting together some tools to aid in validation
- QA will be repeated in much the same way next round with a solicitation of volunteers. Volunteers will be assigned different topics
WGM Planning
Reps asked to solicit room planning
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Back to FHIR_Management_Group
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International