This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "June 27th, Templates Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
## JC - Sooner rather than later if Sept is going to be a decision point. Need to invite a representative of the Patient Centric SIGs to the Clinical Stream Calls. | ## JC - Sooner rather than later if Sept is going to be a decision point. Need to invite a representative of the Patient Centric SIGs to the Clinical Stream Calls. | ||
## Templates co-chars need to join list servs of the other sigs to learn what their needs are (Decision Support, Emergency Dept, Patient Safety, etc) with specific requirements, and we need to engage them. | ## Templates co-chars need to join list servs of the other sigs to learn what their needs are (Decision Support, Emergency Dept, Patient Safety, etc) with specific requirements, and we need to engage them. | ||
| + | ## DK - Point 6 in ARM's doc is very challenging. Need to look at what Sam Heard is done? Do we come up with examples demonstrating the methodology, so that people can see what we want from them, and why we want it. | ||
| + | ## JC - Templates SIG should foster groups who have specific needs,and showing how the process works. Temlates SIG shuld not produce narmative material, but to further refine normative material. | ||
| + | |||
# Next Week's Agenda (technical) | # Next Week's Agenda (technical) | ||
# Adjourn | # Adjourn | ||
[http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php?title=June_27th%2C_Templates_Agenda Agenda] | [http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php?title=June_27th%2C_Templates_Agenda Agenda] | ||
Revision as of 14:58, 27 June 2005
- Roll Call
- Russ Hamm
- Angelo Rossi Mori
- Jane Curry
- Dipak Karla
- Agenda Check
- Review / Discussion of Angelo's view on TAAP (see also Dr. Dipak Karla's Presentation)
- Strategize on plan/timeline/next steps
- JC - Communication Strategies. International Affiliates List Server. Notify other Clinicial based SIGs.
- ARM -Await approval of ARM's document before moving?
- JC - Just notify people and invite them to participate.
- ARM - Give an idea as to what the initiative is.
- JC - Call what we ha ve draft material, and engage the SIGs that are fostered by clinician participation. Invite them to join in on the informative stages. Perhaps ARM's document is a little too specific for the invitation proposal.
- ARM - What documents do we need to present to engage the clinicians?
- DK - A couple thoughts on the ARM document:
- On section 3 and 4 Suggest to use the alliance project, and agree a means of coordinating alliance. Make 3 and 4 more focused on the alliance. How does the alliance get coordinated, and how dothe parent bodies still function? Document is for the alliance, not Templates SIG specific. 3.How to bring parties to the alliance? 4. How the alliance get coordinated, and how dothe parent bodies still function?
- JC - The Templates SIG needs to coordinate HL7 involvement of HL7 TCs/Comittees i the TAAP.
- ARM - Need a similar organization within CEN to coordate CEN involvement within CEN.
- Dipak is contact point for CEN involvement (and openEHR for the time being)
- RH - How/when to begin advertising within HL7/CEN?
- JC - Sooner rather than later if Sept is going to be a decision point. Need to invite a representative of the Patient Centric SIGs to the Clinical Stream Calls.
- Templates co-chars need to join list servs of the other sigs to learn what their needs are (Decision Support, Emergency Dept, Patient Safety, etc) with specific requirements, and we need to engage them.
- DK - Point 6 in ARM's doc is very challenging. Need to look at what Sam Heard is done? Do we come up with examples demonstrating the methodology, so that people can see what we want from them, and why we want it.
- JC - Templates SIG should foster groups who have specific needs,and showing how the process works. Temlates SIG shuld not produce narmative material, but to further refine normative material.
- Next Week's Agenda (technical)
- Adjourn
