This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "December 18, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
'''Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot''' - Tony Weida | '''Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot''' - Tony Weida | ||
* Unidentified commenter | * Unidentified commenter | ||
− | ** Class representing Health Record | + | ** Class representing Health Record – proposal was to retain the record object as a direct child of ''object'' |
* John Moehrke comments | * John Moehrke comments | ||
− | + | ** What If we provide a free reader for OWL? | |
+ | ** We will need to speak to SOA WG regarding SOA Ontology project status and plan | ||
+ | ** '''ACTION ITEM: Tony will contact SOA Group''' | ||
+ | ** SNOMED CT content is not balloted (in regards on their content); note that members have used SNOMED CT but never in a document form (always with their provided reader) | ||
+ | ** the balloted piece is the document, wheras the OWL is a | ||
'''Healthcare Classification Service ''Guide'' ''' | '''Healthcare Classification Service ''Guide'' ''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 22:35, 18 December 2012
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Bill Braithwaite
- Kathleen Connor
- Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- Jim Kretz
- John Moehrke Security Co-chair
- Milan Petkovic
- Ken Salyards
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- WEatherby
- Tony Weida
- Trish Williams
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (15 min) Security and Privacy Ontology Tony Weida
- (15 min) HCS Classification Service GUIDE Mike Davis
- (15 min) Proposal: Next meeting
- (05 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot - Tony Weida
- Unidentified commenter
- Class representing Health Record – proposal was to retain the record object as a direct child of object
- John Moehrke comments
- What If we provide a free reader for OWL?
- We will need to speak to SOA WG regarding SOA Ontology project status and plan
- ACTION ITEM: Tony will contact SOA Group
- SNOMED CT content is not balloted (in regards on their content); note that members have used SNOMED CT but never in a document form (always with their provided reader)
- the balloted piece is the document, wheras the OWL is a
Healthcare Classification Service Guide