This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "November 13, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
 
*RE:  '''HCS Ballot Update'''
 
*RE:  '''HCS Ballot Update'''
 
*Submit by Sunday
 
*Submit by Sunday
*RE:   '''November SWG Harmonization Report'''
+
*RE: '''November SWG Harmonization Report'''
 
*RE:  '''Consent Directive CDA Update for DS4P and Security Label Template'''
 
*RE:  '''Consent Directive CDA Update for DS4P and Security Label Template'''
From proposed Nov. 13 CBCC Call Agenda:
+
From proposed Nov. 13 CBCC Call Agenda: Proposed changes to CDAr2 Implementation Guide for Consent Directives based on lessons-learned from ONC S&I Framework DS4P Initiative (Data Segmentation for Privacy) and new Health Care Classification Scheme project related to Security Labeling  
**Proposed changes to CDAr2 Implementation Guide for Consent Directives based on lessons-learned from ONC S&I Framework DS4P Initiative (Data Segmentation for Privacy) and new Health Care Classification Scheme project related to Security Labeling  
 
 
***Ensure that specific information (e.g., a specific substance abuse encounter to diagnosis and treat HIV related to substance abuse) can be specified as a “redacted” or “masked” segment of health information  
 
***Ensure that specific information (e.g., a specific substance abuse encounter to diagnosis and treat HIV related to substance abuse) can be specified as a “redacted” or “masked” segment of health information  
 
***Enable metadata tagging of general and specific PHI “sequestered” by a CDA Consent Directive with security label fields (using HL7 SecurityObservationVocabulary to indicate confidentiality, sensitivity, handling caveats, and integrity) so that custodians and receivers can enforce access control based on the security label  
 
***Enable metadata tagging of general and specific PHI “sequestered” by a CDA Consent Directive with security label fields (using HL7 SecurityObservationVocabulary to indicate confidentiality, sensitivity, handling caveats, and integrity) so that custodians and receivers can enforce access control based on the security label  
Line 53: Line 52:
 
*RE:
 
*RE:
 
==Reference Material from Call==
 
==Reference Material from Call==
*[ http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7066/9856/2012Nov_HARM_FINALPROPOSAL_VOCAB_SECURE_kathleen_connor_SecurityObservationVocabulary_forSWG.doc Security Observation Vocabulary Final Nov. 2012 Harmonization Proposal]
+
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7066/9856/2012Nov_HARM_FINALPROPOSAL_VOCAB_SECURE_kathleen_connor_SecurityObservationVocabulary_forSWG.doc Security Observation Vocabulary Final Nov. 2012 Harmonization Proposal]
*[ http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7067/9857/2012Nov_HARM_FINALPROPOSAL_VOCAB_SECURE_kathleen_connor_TechnicalCorrectionGeneralPOU_20121028215003.doc General POU Technical Correction Final Nov. 2012 Harmonization Proposal]
+
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7067/9857/2012Nov_HARM_FINALPROPOSAL_VOCAB_SECURE_kathleen_connor_TechnicalCorrectionGeneralPOU_20121028215003.doc General POU Technical Correction Final Nov. 2012 Harmonization Proposal]
*[ http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7068/9858/2012Nov_HARM_FINALPROPOSAL_VOCAB_SECURE_kathleen_connor_UpdateSensitivityCodeCELtoVIP_20121028214841.doc Update Sensitivity Code CEL to VIP Final Nov. 2012 Harmonization Proposal]
+
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7068/9858/2012Nov_HARM_FINALPROPOSAL_VOCAB_SECURE_kathleen_connor_UpdateSensitivityCodeCELtoVIP_20121028214841.doc Update Sensitivity Code CEL to VIP Final Nov. 2012 Harmonization Proposal]
 
* [[Image: Security_Observation_Vocabulary2.png|600px|thumb|left|Diagram of the components of a healthcare security labeling system]]
 
* [[Image: Security_Observation_Vocabulary2.png|600px|thumb|left|Diagram of the components of a healthcare security labeling system]]
 
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]
 
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]

Revision as of 21:43, 13 November 2012

Security Working Group Meeting

Meeting Information Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve November 6, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call November 6, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. (10 min) S&P Ontology Ballot Update – Mike Davis and John Carter
  3. (15 min) HCS Ballot Update - Mike Davis
  4. (10 min) November SWG Harmonization Report – Kathleen Connor
  5. (15 min) Consent Directive CDA Update for DS4P and Security Label Template – Group
  6. (05 min) Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up

Minutes

  • RE: Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, XXX…, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda. XXX moved; YYY seconded. Minutes and agenda approved (0-0-0)
  • RE: S&P Ontology Ballot Update
    • Withdraw from Jan 2013 Ballot and continue work for May 2013 Ballot?
    • Note from Don Lloyd to SWG Cochairs: May 2011 ballot –Recon SS was posted; however, negative voters were not notified. Also, while the May 2012 ballot was a Comment Only ballot, it would be appreciated if the WG would post a spreadsheet and notify voters.
  • RE: HCS Ballot Update
  • Submit by Sunday
  • RE: November SWG Harmonization Report
  • RE: Consent Directive CDA Update for DS4P and Security Label Template

From proposed Nov. 13 CBCC Call Agenda: Proposed changes to CDAr2 Implementation Guide for Consent Directives based on lessons-learned from ONC S&I Framework DS4P Initiative (Data Segmentation for Privacy) and new Health Care Classification Scheme project related to Security Labeling

      • Ensure that specific information (e.g., a specific substance abuse encounter to diagnosis and treat HIV related to substance abuse) can be specified as a “redacted” or “masked” segment of health information
      • Enable metadata tagging of general and specific PHI “sequestered” by a CDA Consent Directive with security label fields (using HL7 SecurityObservationVocabulary to indicate confidentiality, sensitivity, handling caveats, and integrity) so that custodians and receivers can enforce access control based on the security label
  • RE: Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up

Meeting adjourned at 2:00 PM Eastern

Action Items

  • RE:
  • RE:

Reference Material from Call

Back to Security Main Page