This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "FMG Management Process Development"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "FMG is charged with managing FHIR development according to precepts laid down by the FGB and according to a methoddology developed by MnM. Neither FBG nor MnM will lay out the d...")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==From Mission & Charter==
 
==From Mission & Charter==
*provide day-to-day oversight of FHIR-related work group activities
+
* 1 provide day-to-day oversight of FHIR-related work group activities
**quality analysis,  
+
**1.1 quality analysis,  
**monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles
+
**1.2 monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles
**aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues
+
**1.3 aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues
 +
 
 +
*2 enable
 +
**2.1 coordinated and consistent development
 +
**2.2 ensure timely feedback to groups
 +
**2.3 ensure development is alligned with broader goals
 +
**2.4 dispute resolution
 +
**2.5 education
 +
***2.5.1 groups know what is expected
 +
***2.5.2 have necessary domain knowledge
 +
***2.5.3 have necessary tools
 +
 
 +
*3 risk management
 +
**3.1 divergent resources
 +
**3.2 uncoordinated development
 +
**3.3 inadequate tooling
 +
**3.4 development space misused
 +
**3.5 balloting not functional
 +
**3.6 unengaged statkeholders
 +
**3.7 excess workload
 +
 
 +
*4 activities
 +
**4.1 advise FGB
 +
**4.2 define and execute QA processes
 +
**4.3 coordinate training
 +
**4.4 coordinate tooling
  
*enable
 
**coordinated and consistent development
 
**ensure timely feedback to groups
 
**ensure development is alligned with broader goals
 
**dispute resolution
 
**education
 
***groups know what is expected
 
***have necessary domain knowledge
 
***have necessary tools
 
  
  
Line 25: Line 41:
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Metric'''
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Metric'''
 
|-
 
|-
| ||||
+
| 1.1 quality analysis,||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
|-
 
| * provide day-to-day oversight of FHIR-related work group activities||Need to know what's actually going on||
 
|-
 
| **quality analysis,||Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
 
|-
 
| **monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles||How to assess?||
 
|-
 
| **aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues||Defined escalation process||
 
 
|-
 
|-
| ||||
+
| 1.2 monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles||How to assess?||
 
|-
 
|-
| * facilitate||||
+
| 1.3 aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues||B. Defined escalation process||
 
|-
 
|-
| **coordinated and consistent development||Need to know what's actually going on||
+
| 2.1 coordinated and consistent development||C. Need to know what's actually going on||
 
|-
 
|-
| **ensure timely feedback to groups||||
+
| 2.2 ensure timely feedback to groups||||
 
|-
 
|-
| **ensure development is alligned with broader goals||Identify the goals||
+
| 2.3 ensure development is alligned with broader goals||D. Identify the goals||
 
|-
 
|-
| **dispute resolution||Defined escalation process||
+
| 2.4 dispute resolution||E. Defined escalation process||
 
|-
 
|-
| **education||Education requirements & delivery plan||
+
| 2.5 education||F. Education requirements & delivery plan||
 
|-
 
|-
| ***groups know what is expected||||
+
| 3.1 divergent resources||C. Need to know what's actually going on||
 
|-
 
|-
| ***have necessary domain knowledge||||
+
| 3.2 uncoordinated development||C. Need to know what's actually going on||
 
|-
 
|-
| ***have necessary tools||||
+
| 3.3 inadequate tooling||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
 
|-
 
|-
| ||||
+
| 3.4 development space misused||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
 
|-
 
|-
| *risk management||||
+
| 3.5 balloting not functional||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
 
|-
 
|-
| **divergent resources||Need to know what's actually going on||
+
| 3.6 unengaged statkeholders||C. Need to know what's actually going on||
 
|-
 
|-
| **uncoordinated development||Need to know what's actually going on||
+
| 3.7 excess workload||C. Need to know what's actually going on||
 
|-
 
|-
| **inadequate tooling||Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
+
| 4.1 advise FGB||||
 
|-
 
|-
| **development space misused||Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
+
| 4.2 define and execute QA processes||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
 
|-
 
|-
| **balloting not functional||Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
+
| 4.3 coordinate training||||
 
|-
 
|-
| **unengaged statkeholders||Need to know what's actually going on||
+
| 4.4 coordinate tooling||||
|-
 
| **excess workload||Need to know what's actually going on||
 
|-
 
| ||||
 
|-
 
| *activities||||
 
|-
 
| **advise FGB||||
 
|-
 
| **define and execute QA processes||Need to specify what constitutes best practice||
 
|-
 
| **coordinate training||||
 
|-
 
| **coordinate tooling||||
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  
 
|  
 
|}
 
|}
 
*risk management
 
**divergent resources
 
**uncoordinated development
 
**inadequate tooling
 
**
 

Revision as of 13:10, 12 November 2012

FMG is charged with managing FHIR development according to precepts laid down by the FGB and according to a methoddology developed by MnM. Neither FBG nor MnM will lay out the day-to-day mechanics by which FMG will undertake its management. This page will work towards specifying What "things" should be mamanaged; what the process will be and what the metrics of success will be.

As a first step the following points can be drawn from the Mission and Charter as a "statement of requirements" for what FMG should do.

From Mission & Charter

  • 1 provide day-to-day oversight of FHIR-related work group activities
    • 1.1 quality analysis,
    • 1.2 monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles
    • 1.3 aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues
  • 2 enable
    • 2.1 coordinated and consistent development
    • 2.2 ensure timely feedback to groups
    • 2.3 ensure development is alligned with broader goals
    • 2.4 dispute resolution
    • 2.5 education
      • 2.5.1 groups know what is expected
      • 2.5.2 have necessary domain knowledge
      • 2.5.3 have necessary tools
  • 3 risk management
    • 3.1 divergent resources
    • 3.2 uncoordinated development
    • 3.3 inadequate tooling
    • 3.4 development space misused
    • 3.5 balloting not functional
    • 3.6 unengaged statkeholders
    • 3.7 excess workload
  • 4 activities
    • 4.1 advise FGB
    • 4.2 define and execute QA processes
    • 4.3 coordinate training
    • 4.4 coordinate tooling


Thing to Manage Process Metric
1.1 quality analysis, A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice
1.2 monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles How to assess?
1.3 aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues B. Defined escalation process
2.1 coordinated and consistent development C. Need to know what's actually going on
2.2 ensure timely feedback to groups
2.3 ensure development is alligned with broader goals D. Identify the goals
2.4 dispute resolution E. Defined escalation process
2.5 education F. Education requirements & delivery plan
3.1 divergent resources C. Need to know what's actually going on
3.2 uncoordinated development C. Need to know what's actually going on
3.3 inadequate tooling A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice
3.4 development space misused A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice
3.5 balloting not functional A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice
3.6 unengaged statkeholders C. Need to know what's actually going on
3.7 excess workload C. Need to know what's actually going on
4.1 advise FGB
4.2 define and execute QA processes A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice
4.3 coordinate training
4.4 coordinate tooling