This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "FMG Management Process Development"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hugh Glover (talk | contribs) (Created page with "FMG is charged with managing FHIR development according to precepts laid down by the FGB and according to a methoddology developed by MnM. Neither FBG nor MnM will lay out the d...") |
Hugh Glover (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==From Mission & Charter== | ==From Mission & Charter== | ||
− | *provide day-to-day oversight of FHIR-related work group activities | + | * 1 provide day-to-day oversight of FHIR-related work group activities |
− | **quality analysis, | + | **1.1 quality analysis, |
− | **monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles | + | **1.2 monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles |
− | **aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues | + | **1.3 aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues |
+ | |||
+ | *2 enable | ||
+ | **2.1 coordinated and consistent development | ||
+ | **2.2 ensure timely feedback to groups | ||
+ | **2.3 ensure development is alligned with broader goals | ||
+ | **2.4 dispute resolution | ||
+ | **2.5 education | ||
+ | ***2.5.1 groups know what is expected | ||
+ | ***2.5.2 have necessary domain knowledge | ||
+ | ***2.5.3 have necessary tools | ||
+ | |||
+ | *3 risk management | ||
+ | **3.1 divergent resources | ||
+ | **3.2 uncoordinated development | ||
+ | **3.3 inadequate tooling | ||
+ | **3.4 development space misused | ||
+ | **3.5 balloting not functional | ||
+ | **3.6 unengaged statkeholders | ||
+ | **3.7 excess workload | ||
+ | |||
+ | *4 activities | ||
+ | **4.1 advise FGB | ||
+ | **4.2 define and execute QA processes | ||
+ | **4.3 coordinate training | ||
+ | **4.4 coordinate tooling | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 25: | Line 41: | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Metric''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Metric''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 1.1 quality analysis,||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice|| |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | |||| | + | | 1.2 monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles||How to assess?|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 1.3 aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues||B. Defined escalation process|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 2.1 coordinated and consistent development||C. Need to know what's actually going on|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 2.2 ensure timely feedback to groups|||| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 2.3 ensure development is alligned with broader goals||D. Identify the goals|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 2.4 dispute resolution||E. Defined escalation process|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 2.5 education||F. Education requirements & delivery plan|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 3.1 divergent resources||C. Need to know what's actually going on|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 3.2 uncoordinated development||C. Need to know what's actually going on|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 3.3 inadequate tooling||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | |||| | + | | 3.4 development space misused||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 3.5 balloting not functional||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 3.6 unengaged statkeholders||C. Need to know what's actually going on|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 3.7 excess workload||C. Need to know what's actually going on|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 4.1 advise FGB|||| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 4.2 define and execute QA processes||A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice|| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 4.3 coordinate training|||| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 4.4 coordinate tooling|||| |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 13:10, 12 November 2012
FMG is charged with managing FHIR development according to precepts laid down by the FGB and according to a methoddology developed by MnM. Neither FBG nor MnM will lay out the day-to-day mechanics by which FMG will undertake its management. This page will work towards specifying What "things" should be mamanaged; what the process will be and what the metrics of success will be.
As a first step the following points can be drawn from the Mission and Charter as a "statement of requirements" for what FMG should do.
From Mission & Charter
- 1 provide day-to-day oversight of FHIR-related work group activities
- 1.1 quality analysis,
- 1.2 monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles
- 1.3 aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues
- 2 enable
- 2.1 coordinated and consistent development
- 2.2 ensure timely feedback to groups
- 2.3 ensure development is alligned with broader goals
- 2.4 dispute resolution
- 2.5 education
- 2.5.1 groups know what is expected
- 2.5.2 have necessary domain knowledge
- 2.5.3 have necessary tools
- 3 risk management
- 3.1 divergent resources
- 3.2 uncoordinated development
- 3.3 inadequate tooling
- 3.4 development space misused
- 3.5 balloting not functional
- 3.6 unengaged statkeholders
- 3.7 excess workload
- 4 activities
- 4.1 advise FGB
- 4.2 define and execute QA processes
- 4.3 coordinate training
- 4.4 coordinate tooling
Thing to Manage | Process | Metric |
1.1 quality analysis, | A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice | |
1.2 monitoring scope and consistency with FHIR principles | How to assess? | |
1.3 aiding in the resolution of FHIR-related intra and inter-work group issues | B. Defined escalation process | |
2.1 coordinated and consistent development | C. Need to know what's actually going on | |
2.2 ensure timely feedback to groups | ||
2.3 ensure development is alligned with broader goals | D. Identify the goals | |
2.4 dispute resolution | E. Defined escalation process | |
2.5 education | F. Education requirements & delivery plan | |
3.1 divergent resources | C. Need to know what's actually going on | |
3.2 uncoordinated development | C. Need to know what's actually going on | |
3.3 inadequate tooling | A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice | |
3.4 development space misused | A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice | |
3.5 balloting not functional | A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice | |
3.6 unengaged statkeholders | C. Need to know what's actually going on | |
3.7 excess workload | C. Need to know what's actually going on | |
4.1 advise FGB | ||
4.2 define and execute QA processes | A. Need to specify what constitutes best practice | |
4.3 coordinate training | ||
4.4 coordinate tooling | ||