This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "October 2, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor]
 
* [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor]
 
* [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Cochair
 
* [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Cochair
*[mailto:ajames@drc.com] Adrienne James
+
* [mailto:ajames@drc.com Adrienne James]
 
  [[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]
 
  [[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
Line 17: Line 17:
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
 
*RE:  Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda.  Since key presenters on several proposed agenda were not present for the call, these items were deferred.  Kathleen moved; Bill seconded.  Minutes and agenda approved (0-0-3)
 
*RE:  Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda.  Since key presenters on several proposed agenda were not present for the call, these items were deferred.  Kathleen moved; Bill seconded.  Minutes and agenda approved (0-0-3)
*RE:  HCS Update – Mike presented the draft [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6988/9701/1.HCSClassificationScheme20121001.docx HCS Classification Scheme presentation] intended for the Oct. 3 DS4P call, which is based on the [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6988/9701/1.HCSClassificationScheme20121001.docx  Healthcare Classification Scheme].  Mike was specifically interested in Bill’s review.  Mike discussed the standard sources for Security Labels, and the utility for healthcare.  Several questions were raised about the structure of the Security Labels including the difference between a hierarchy and a scale, and the relation between sensitivity and compartment as different Security Label Field names.   
+
*RE:  HCS Update – Mike presented the draft [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6988/9701/1.HCSClassificationScheme20121001.docx HCS Classification Scheme presentation] intended for the Oct. 3 DS4P call, which is based on the [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6988/9701/1.HCSClassificationScheme20121001.docx  Healthcare Classification Scheme paper].  Mike was specifically interested in Bill’s review.  Mike discussed the standard sources for Security Labels, and the utility for healthcare.  Several questions were raised about the structure of the Security Labels including the difference between a hierarchy and a scale, and the relation between sensitivity and compartment as different Security Label Field names.   
 
*RE:  No other business was discussed.
 
*RE:  No other business was discussed.
 
Meeting adjourned at 2:00 PM Eastern
 
Meeting adjourned at 2:00 PM Eastern

Latest revision as of 04:19, 2 November 2012

Security Working Group Meeting

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Sept. 25, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. (20 min) HCS Update – Presentation to DS4P Wednesday Oct. 3 – Mike Davis
  3. (10 min) ISO WG 4 Report – Trish Williams
  4. (10 min) Upcoming Deadlines - Kathleen Connor
  5. (10 min) Phoenix WGM Session and Room Scheduling – John Moehrke
  6. (05 min) Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up

Minutes

  • RE: Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda. Since key presenters on several proposed agenda were not present for the call, these items were deferred. Kathleen moved; Bill seconded. Minutes and agenda approved (0-0-3)
  • RE: HCS Update – Mike presented the draft HCS Classification Scheme presentation intended for the Oct. 3 DS4P call, which is based on the Healthcare Classification Scheme paper. Mike was specifically interested in Bill’s review. Mike discussed the standard sources for Security Labels, and the utility for healthcare. Several questions were raised about the structure of the Security Labels including the difference between a hierarchy and a scale, and the relation between sensitivity and compartment as different Security Label Field names.
  • RE: No other business was discussed.

Meeting adjourned at 2:00 PM Eastern

Action Items

  • RE:
  • RE:

Back to Security Main Page