This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120926"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
Reviewed draft harmonization proposal posted to list by Wendy.  Proposal is to update descriptions of 3 concept domains.  Austin noted that one of the concept domains is deprecated.  Not a reason to not improve the definition.
 
Reviewed draft harmonization proposal posted to list by Wendy.  Proposal is to update descriptions of 3 concept domains.  Austin noted that one of the concept domains is deprecated.  Not a reason to not improve the definition.
  
Motion: MnM endorses this proposal to go forward to harmonization.  Move Wendy, second Austin: Unanymous
+
Motion: MnM endorses this proposal to go forward to harmonization.  Move Wendy, second Austin: Unanimous
  
 
==PSS Proposal==
 
==PSS Proposal==

Latest revision as of 20:13, 3 October 2012


M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)

Return to MnM Minutes

Agenda

  • Harmonization proposal from Wendy H.
  • PSS from Kevin C.

Attendees

  • Wendy Huang
  • Austin Kreisler
  • Lloyd McKenzie
  • Jean Duteau
  • Rob Hausam

Harmonization Proposal

Reviewed draft harmonization proposal posted to list by Wendy. Proposal is to update descriptions of 3 concept domains. Austin noted that one of the concept domains is deprecated. Not a reason to not improve the definition.

Motion: MnM endorses this proposal to go forward to harmonization. Move Wendy, second Austin: Unanimous

PSS Proposal

Kevin C. has asked MnM to endorse a PSS dealing with Detailed Clinical Models

Discussion:

  • Committee found the text very long and confusing. The scope needs to be much more concise.
  • At minimum, we have a concern about the proposal to create CMETs.
  • Step 1 should indicate that the expected outcome is harmonization proposals
  • We need clarity on exactly what MnM’s role will be and how DCM methodology is expected to be distinct from existing methodology for creation of v3 models.
  • It also seems odd to have methodology covered last.
  • We need more clarity in the proposal and then perhaps to hold a joint call before we could consider endorsing

Motion: Defer decision on endorsement until above issues are addressed. Austin/Jean: 3:0:1

Adjournment

Call adjourned at ~16:40