This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR098 - XPN Flavors"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{OO Open Change Requests}} {{OO Open LRI IG Change Requests}} Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 borde...") |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Closed Change Requests}} |
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Closed LRI IG Change Requests}} |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | * 4 September 2012 | ||
| + | ** Motion by Riki Merrick, to keep XPN-7 RE. Seconded by Scott Robertson, | ||
| + | ** Discussion pointed out that the requirement on the EHR makes sense, but on the Lab particularly when the name may have been manually entered without knowledge what the name represented. Lab systems often only support one name therefore may not have the concept of name type. | ||
| + | ** Against: 0 Abstain: 1 Favor: 4 | ||
Latest revision as of 20:41, 18 September 2012
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Ken McCaslin | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: 30 August 2012 | Change request ID: OO CR098 - XPN-7 Change from RE to R |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
On review with the LOI IG, it is believed that the LRI IG should have the XPN-7 changed from RE to R so that it is clear what how the name should be represented.
Recommendation
Suggest to hyperlink from Data Type in each table to the appropriate data types as part of official publication.
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
- 4 September 2012
- Motion by Riki Merrick, to keep XPN-7 RE. Seconded by Scott Robertson,
- Discussion pointed out that the requirement on the EHR makes sense, but on the Lab particularly when the name may have been manually entered without knowledge what the name represented. Lab systems often only support one name therefore may not have the concept of name type.
- Against: 0 Abstain: 1 Favor: 4
