This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "January 25th, Templates Minutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
## Russell Hamm
 
## Russell Hamm
 
## Brett Essler
 
## Brett Essler
 +
## Craig Parker (lurking)
 
##  
 
##  
 
# Agenda Check  
 
# Agenda Check  
Line 25: Line 26:
 
# Action Items
 
# Action Items
 
## ACTION: Can MIF represent co-ocurrance (invariants in openEHR)
 
## ACTION: Can MIF represent co-ocurrance (invariants in openEHR)
 +
## ACTION: Russ and Brett to flush through DK's comments and make recommendations on adopting the CEN/openEHR requirements.
 +
## ACTION: Brett and Russ and Galen to put together tooling agenda items.
 +
## ACTION:  Look at Patient Care RMIMs from William Goosen.
 
# Adjourn
 
# Adjourn
  
 
http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/January_25th%2C_Templates_Agenda
 
http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/January_25th%2C_Templates_Agenda

Latest revision as of 16:34, 26 January 2006

  1. Roll Call
    1. Heath Frankel
    2. Galen Mulrooney
    3. Sarah Ryan
    4. Mark Shafarman
    5. Russell Hamm
    6. Brett Essler
    7. Craig Parker (lurking)
  2. Agenda Check
    1. Looks ok.
  3. Overview of the Phoenix WGM (minutes comming soon.)
    1. Heath's presentation and DMIM mapping
    2. CEN/openEHR Requirements
  4. Discussion on proceeding with CEN/openEHR/HL7 Archetypes Requirement adoption.
    1. HF - To take RMIM designer and output ADL would be reasonable. Modifying the Archetype editor to support HL7 artifacts would be a larger task. The Archetype Editor has builtin knowledge of CEN/openEHR classes that are used internalle. THese would need to be mapped.
    2. HF - Is it proper to build archetypes in the context of HL7 model?
    3. HF - ADL workbench is more generic. Displays nodes and branches. Can show the observation CMET in the ADL WB. Few ADL validators would handle HL7.
    4. HF - Can MIF handle the knowldge required by the invariants (co-occurance, interfield validation) How this can be extracted from MIF is not known.
    5. HF - Take WGs RMIMs, represent in Rose Tree, and export to ADL. Then ADL->OWL. These are supposed to be constraints on Clinical Statement, but no machinery to support.
    6. HF Australia developing Data Groups (on 11179) to support hierarchical structures (archetypes). Heath can put up in contact with the relevent people. One document (comprehensive) on medication datagroup.
  5. Review of MDE Proposal
    1. Proposal for establishing a proof of concept for creating HL7 templates for a master set of data elements.
  6. Determine the next call time.
  7. Next Agenda Topics.
  8. Action Items
    1. ACTION: Can MIF represent co-ocurrance (invariants in openEHR)
    2. ACTION: Russ and Brett to flush through DK's comments and make recommendations on adopting the CEN/openEHR requirements.
    3. ACTION: Brett and Russ and Galen to put together tooling agenda items.
    4. ACTION: Look at Patient Care RMIMs from William Goosen.
  9. Adjourn

http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/January_25th%2C_Templates_Agenda