This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120627 Harmonization Tech Review"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Attendees==
 
==Attendees==
 
Beeler, Shakir, Klein, Huang
 
Beeler, Shakir, Klein, Huang
==Items Seeking Changes to the RIM==
+
==Items Seeking Changes to the RIM During Second Trimester==
The proposal set included one item that sought to make changes in the ActClass code hierarchy, and might have included another (that was not formally submitted by the deadline) to change the ActRelationshipType codes.  This led to the discussion of MnM's intent to limit RIM changes (including changes to the code systems that are referenced by RIM attributes typed with data type CS) to only those changes needed to reconcile negative votes arising from the (annual) May Ballot cycle RIM Normative ballot.  Although this proscription has been in place for several years, it is not well documented.   
+
The proposal set included one item that sought to make changes in the ActClass code hierarchy, and might have included another proposal (that was not formally submitted by the deadline) to change the ActRelationshipType codes.  This led to the discussion of MnM's intent to limit RIM changes (including changes to the code systems that are referenced by RIM attributes typed with data type CS) to only those changes needed to reconcile negative votes arising from the annual May Ballot cycle RIM Normative ballot.  Although this proscription has been in place for several years, it is not well documented.   
  
The group agreed that this should be clearly documented on the Wiki and expressly listed in the [[Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process]] page.
+
The group agreed that this should be clearly documented on the Wiki and expressly listed in the [[Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process]] page. Along with these minutes, changes were made to the [[[[Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process#Initial Proposal Rules| Harmonization Initial Proposal Rules]] and to the Wiki [[RIM_Maintenance_and_Tooling_Documentation#RIM_Balloting_Using_ANSI_Continuous_Maintenance_Process|documentation of RIM Maintenance procedures]].
  
 
==Agenda Item 1==
 
==Agenda Item 1==

Revision as of 00:43, 29 June 2012


Harmonization Technical Review Conference Call 10:30AM Eastern Time (Date above)

Return to MnM Minutes

Agenda

  • Review Proposals for July 2012 Harmonization

Attendees

Beeler, Shakir, Klein, Huang

Items Seeking Changes to the RIM During Second Trimester

The proposal set included one item that sought to make changes in the ActClass code hierarchy, and might have included another proposal (that was not formally submitted by the deadline) to change the ActRelationshipType codes. This led to the discussion of MnM's intent to limit RIM changes (including changes to the code systems that are referenced by RIM attributes typed with data type CS) to only those changes needed to reconcile negative votes arising from the annual May Ballot cycle RIM Normative ballot. Although this proscription has been in place for several years, it is not well documented.

The group agreed that this should be clearly documented on the Wiki and expressly listed in the Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process page. Along with these minutes, changes were made to the [[ Harmonization Initial Proposal Rules and to the Wiki documentation of RIM Maintenance procedures.

Agenda Item 1

Goes here

Review Action Items For MnM

Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items:

Adjournment