Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120627 Harmonization Tech Review"
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
Beeler, Shakir, Klein, Huang | Beeler, Shakir, Klein, Huang | ||
− | ==Items Seeking Changes to the RIM== | + | ==Items Seeking Changes to the RIM During Second Trimester== |
− | The proposal set included one item that sought to make changes in the ActClass code hierarchy, and might have included another (that was not formally submitted by the deadline) to change the ActRelationshipType codes. This led to the discussion of MnM's intent to limit RIM changes (including changes to the code systems that are referenced by RIM attributes typed with data type CS) to only those changes needed to reconcile negative votes arising from the | + | The proposal set included one item that sought to make changes in the ActClass code hierarchy, and might have included another proposal (that was not formally submitted by the deadline) to change the ActRelationshipType codes. This led to the discussion of MnM's intent to limit RIM changes (including changes to the code systems that are referenced by RIM attributes typed with data type CS) to only those changes needed to reconcile negative votes arising from the annual May Ballot cycle RIM Normative ballot. Although this proscription has been in place for several years, it is not well documented. |
− | The group agreed that this should be clearly documented on the Wiki and expressly listed in the [[Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process]] page. | + | The group agreed that this should be clearly documented on the Wiki and expressly listed in the [[Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process]] page. Along with these minutes, changes were made to the [[[[Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process#Initial Proposal Rules| Harmonization Initial Proposal Rules]] and to the Wiki [[RIM_Maintenance_and_Tooling_Documentation#RIM_Balloting_Using_ANSI_Continuous_Maintenance_Process|documentation of RIM Maintenance procedures]]. |
==Agenda Item 1== | ==Agenda Item 1== |
Revision as of 00:43, 29 June 2012
Harmonization Technical Review Conference Call 10:30AM Eastern Time (Date above)
Agenda
- Review Proposals for July 2012 Harmonization
Attendees
Beeler, Shakir, Klein, Huang
Items Seeking Changes to the RIM During Second Trimester
The proposal set included one item that sought to make changes in the ActClass code hierarchy, and might have included another proposal (that was not formally submitted by the deadline) to change the ActRelationshipType codes. This led to the discussion of MnM's intent to limit RIM changes (including changes to the code systems that are referenced by RIM attributes typed with data type CS) to only those changes needed to reconcile negative votes arising from the annual May Ballot cycle RIM Normative ballot. Although this proscription has been in place for several years, it is not well documented.
The group agreed that this should be clearly documented on the Wiki and expressly listed in the Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process page. Along with these minutes, changes were made to the [[ Harmonization Initial Proposal Rules and to the Wiki documentation of RIM Maintenance procedures.
Agenda Item 1
Goes here
Review Action Items For MnM
Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items: