Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120627 Harmonization Tech Review"
(Created page with "{{subst::MnM Template for Agenda-Minutes}}") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
EDITORS - When converting the content from Agenda to minutes: | EDITORS - When converting the content from Agenda to minutes: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
2) Delete the Logistics template reference | 2) Delete the Logistics template reference | ||
{{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}} below | {{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}} below | ||
| − | -->[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes | + | -->[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes]] |
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| − | = | + | =Harmonization Technical Review Conference Call 10:30AM Eastern Time (Date above)= |
| − | |||
[[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | [[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
| − | * | + | *Review Proposals for July 2012 Harmonization |
| + | ==Attendees== | ||
| + | Beeler, Shakir, Klein, Huang | ||
| + | ==Items Seeking Changes to the RIM== | ||
| + | The proposal set included one item that sought to make changes in the ActClass code hierarchy, and might have included another (that was not formally submitted by the deadline) to change the ActRelationshipType codes. This led to the discussion of MnM's intent to limit RIM changes (including changes to the code systems that are referenced by RIM attributes typed with data type CS) to only those changes needed to reconcile negative votes arising from the (annual) May Ballot cycle RIM Normative ballot. Although this proscription has been in place for several years, it is not well documented. | ||
| − | + | The group agreed that this should be clearly documented on the Wiki and expressly listed in the [[Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process]] page. | |
| − | |||
==Agenda Item 1== | ==Agenda Item 1== | ||
Revision as of 23:32, 28 June 2012
Harmonization Technical Review Conference Call 10:30AM Eastern Time (Date above)
Agenda
- Review Proposals for July 2012 Harmonization
Attendees
Beeler, Shakir, Klein, Huang
Items Seeking Changes to the RIM
The proposal set included one item that sought to make changes in the ActClass code hierarchy, and might have included another (that was not formally submitted by the deadline) to change the ActRelationshipType codes. This led to the discussion of MnM's intent to limit RIM changes (including changes to the code systems that are referenced by RIM attributes typed with data type CS) to only those changes needed to reconcile negative votes arising from the (annual) May Ballot cycle RIM Normative ballot. Although this proscription has been in place for several years, it is not well documented.
The group agreed that this should be clearly documented on the Wiki and expressly listed in the Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process page.
Agenda Item 1
Goes here
Review Action Items For MnM
Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items:
