This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120620"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst::MnM Template for Agenda-Minutes}}")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
   EDITORS - When converting the content from Agenda to minutes:
 
   EDITORS - When converting the content from Agenda to minutes:
Line 6: Line 5:
 
   2) Delete the Logistics template reference  
 
   2) Delete the Logistics template reference  
 
         {{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}}  below
 
         {{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}}  below
-->[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Agenda Template]]
+
-->[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes]]
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)=
 
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)=
{{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}}
 
 
[[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]]
 
[[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]]
 +
==Attendees==
 +
Beeler, Stechishin, Pech, Hamill, Hausam
 +
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
*Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_yyyymmdd| Minutes Prior Meeting on mm/dd]]
+
*Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20120613| Minutes Prior Meeting on June 13]]
 +
*CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB
 +
==Business==
 +
*Approved agenda - Stechishin, Pech unanimous
 +
*Amended then [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20120613| approved Minutes of June 13]]
 +
 
 +
==CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB==
 +
===Status summary by Beeler, stechishin and Hamill: ===
 +
 
 +
Detailed review of the CMETs status, including the dates and results of prior reconciliation leave us with a singular conclusion.  MnM must undertake to sponsor a Normative Ballot that includes all CMETs previously balloted (and '''mostly approved''') as Releases 3 through Release 9 -- everything since release 2.  While the vast majority of these are "clean" (have no outstanding negatives), the package as a whole has gone too long without ANSI-recognized completion.  Therefore the only safe approach is to submit '''all of these''' for one more round of Normative review.
 +
 
 +
The balloting will include:
 +
* Language making it clear that all CMETS in releases 1 & 2 that have not been altered are considered a part of release 4.  (Thus obviating the need for reaffirmation)
 +
*Include a listing for each CMET in the ballot showing whether it :
 +
**has no negatives against it
 +
** had negatives but those were reconciled; or
 +
** have negatives that may still remain unreconciled (in which case, where possible, to list the negative
 +
*a Zip archive of all relevant reconciliation packages
 +
 
 +
Concluded that MnM should approve a project proposal to this end, and the submission of an NIB for the September 2012 ballot.
 +
 
 +
===Motion===
 +
Andy Stechishin made motion to allow either:
 +
#Accept responsibility for hosting and reconciling a composite CMET ballot as outlined above under Project 887 that the TSC sponsored for CMET management; or
 +
#Authorize submission to TSC of an MnM PSS, which project will undertake this ballot and then conclude.
  
==Agenda Item 1==
+
Second: Rob Hausam
Goes here
 
  
==Agenda Item 1==
+
Unanimous
Goes here
 
  
 
{{:MnM Action Items from 201005}}
 
{{:MnM Action Items from 201005}}
  
 
==Adjournment==
 
==Adjournment==

Latest revision as of 20:41, 20 June 2012


M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)

Return to MnM Minutes

Attendees

Beeler, Stechishin, Pech, Hamill, Hausam

Agenda

Business

CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB

Status summary by Beeler, stechishin and Hamill:

Detailed review of the CMETs status, including the dates and results of prior reconciliation leave us with a singular conclusion. MnM must undertake to sponsor a Normative Ballot that includes all CMETs previously balloted (and mostly approved) as Releases 3 through Release 9 -- everything since release 2. While the vast majority of these are "clean" (have no outstanding negatives), the package as a whole has gone too long without ANSI-recognized completion. Therefore the only safe approach is to submit all of these for one more round of Normative review.

The balloting will include:

  • Language making it clear that all CMETS in releases 1 & 2 that have not been altered are considered a part of release 4. (Thus obviating the need for reaffirmation)
  • Include a listing for each CMET in the ballot showing whether it :
    • has no negatives against it
    • had negatives but those were reconciled; or
    • have negatives that may still remain unreconciled (in which case, where possible, to list the negative
  • a Zip archive of all relevant reconciliation packages

Concluded that MnM should approve a project proposal to this end, and the submission of an NIB for the September 2012 ballot.

Motion

Andy Stechishin made motion to allow either:

  1. Accept responsibility for hosting and reconciling a composite CMET ballot as outlined above under Project 887 that the TSC sponsored for CMET management; or
  2. Authorize submission to TSC of an MnM PSS, which project will undertake this ballot and then conclude.

Second: Rob Hausam

Unanimous

Review Action Items For MnM

Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items:

Adjournment