This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CTS2N - 17-April-12"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Minutes 17-Apr-2012= | = Minutes 17-Apr-2012= | ||
| − | == Roll Call | + | == Roll Call == |
* Ana Estelrich (AE) | * Ana Estelrich (AE) | ||
| − | * | + | * Russell Hamm (RH) |
| + | * Craig Stancl (CS) | ||
| + | * Kevin Peterson | ||
| + | * Brian Schweiller | ||
* Senthil Nachimuthu (SN) | * Senthil Nachimuthu (SN) | ||
| − | |||
| − | * | + | * Monica Harry (regrets) |
| − | |||
* Frank Oemig (regrets) | * Frank Oemig (regrets) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Agenda Check== | ||
* No additional agenda items | * No additional agenda items | ||
| + | |||
== Announcements == | == Announcements == | ||
| − | * RH - cts2.org currently redirects to apelon.com. This is being reworked to be more inclusive. One item being considered is a launcher page that would provide links to the various cts 2 activities such as the | + | * RH - cts2.org currently redirects to apelon.com. This is being reworked to be more inclusive. One item being considered is a launcher page that would provide links to the various cts 2 activities such as the Normative work in HL7, the OMG PIM, implementation guides, the development framework, etc. What other options should we consider for the cts2.org page? |
| + | |||
| + | Kevin - Who would control updates? How would we make/request changes? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Action - Russ will explore who will control changes to cts2.org. | ||
== Action Item Review == | == Action Item Review == | ||
# Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make voting rules official. | # Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make voting rules official. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Russ to write up the CTS 2N voting policy, and move to get Vocabulary approval on Thursday's main vocabulary call. Policy will be one co-chair and simple majority with Vocabulary voting on major milestones. | ||
== CTS 2 Milestones == | == CTS 2 Milestones == | ||
* Discuss deliverable milestones and dates for CTS 2. Potential milestones include: | * Discuss deliverable milestones and dates for CTS 2. Potential milestones include: | ||
| − | ** | + | ** A document outlining how the CTS 2 information and functional model in the SFM aligns with HL7 Core Principles of vocabulary |
** PIM->SFM matrix alignment (validate what functionality is/is not present in the PIM based on the SFM requirements. Document the rationalization of the design decisions made in the PIM | ** PIM->SFM matrix alignment (validate what functionality is/is not present in the PIM based on the SFM requirements. Document the rationalization of the design decisions made in the PIM | ||
** HL7 terminology model (MIF based) | ** HL7 terminology model (MIF based) | ||
| Line 29: | Line 39: | ||
** Final document integrating the above | ** Final document integrating the above | ||
** … | ** … | ||
| + | |||
| + | * | ||
| + | |||
| + | Chair can Accept the alignment of the correct provide a document to vocabulary for approval | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Motion''' (CS): Update the original SFM Word document to align with the HL7 core principles of vocabulary. Once editors are satisfied move to a new document (SFM boilerplate) and have Vocab WG review and approve. | ||
| + | AE - 2nd | ||
| + | Motion carries unanimously | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Motion''' (CS) : CTS 2 create a matrix that aligns the OMG PIM and HL7 SFM documenting what operatios are implemented (or not) in the PIM provide rationalization and description and location of that operation in the PIM. This document will be reviewed and voted on by the VOcabulary WG. | ||
| + | Second: AE | ||
| + | Motion carries unanimously | ||
| + | |||
| + | Propose that vocabulary review and vote on our milestone deliverables. | ||
| + | == Preliminary agenda items for next week == | ||
| − | == Action | + | == Action Items == |
| + | * '''Russ''' will explore who will control changes to cts2.org. | ||
| + | * Russ to write up voting policy | ||
| + | * '''Craig''' to send OMG omissions list to list. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:46, 24 April 2012
Contents
Minutes 17-Apr-2012
Roll Call
- Ana Estelrich (AE)
- Russell Hamm (RH)
- Craig Stancl (CS)
- Kevin Peterson
- Brian Schweiller
- Senthil Nachimuthu (SN)
- Monica Harry (regrets)
- Frank Oemig (regrets)
Agenda Check
- No additional agenda items
Announcements
- RH - cts2.org currently redirects to apelon.com. This is being reworked to be more inclusive. One item being considered is a launcher page that would provide links to the various cts 2 activities such as the Normative work in HL7, the OMG PIM, implementation guides, the development framework, etc. What other options should we consider for the cts2.org page?
Kevin - Who would control updates? How would we make/request changes?
Action - Russ will explore who will control changes to cts2.org.
Action Item Review
- Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make voting rules official.
Russ to write up the CTS 2N voting policy, and move to get Vocabulary approval on Thursday's main vocabulary call. Policy will be one co-chair and simple majority with Vocabulary voting on major milestones.
CTS 2 Milestones
- Discuss deliverable milestones and dates for CTS 2. Potential milestones include:
- A document outlining how the CTS 2 information and functional model in the SFM aligns with HL7 Core Principles of vocabulary
- PIM->SFM matrix alignment (validate what functionality is/is not present in the PIM based on the SFM requirements. Document the rationalization of the design decisions made in the PIM
- HL7 terminology model (MIF based)
- Conformance profile for HL7 CTS 2
- Document from implementers outlining changes to the SFM functional requirements based on user experience
- Final document integrating the above
- …
Chair can Accept the alignment of the correct provide a document to vocabulary for approval
Motion (CS): Update the original SFM Word document to align with the HL7 core principles of vocabulary. Once editors are satisfied move to a new document (SFM boilerplate) and have Vocab WG review and approve. AE - 2nd Motion carries unanimously
Motion (CS) : CTS 2 create a matrix that aligns the OMG PIM and HL7 SFM documenting what operatios are implemented (or not) in the PIM provide rationalization and description and location of that operation in the PIM. This document will be reviewed and voted on by the VOcabulary WG. Second: AE Motion carries unanimously
Propose that vocabulary review and vote on our milestone deliverables.
Preliminary agenda items for next week
Action Items
- Russ will explore who will control changes to cts2.org.
- Russ to write up voting policy
- Craig to send OMG omissions list to list.
