This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CTS2N - 17-April-12"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Roll Call and Agenda Check== | == Roll Call and Agenda Check== | ||
* Ana Estelrich (AE) | * Ana Estelrich (AE) | ||
| + | * Russell Hamm (RH) | ||
| + | * Craig Stancl | ||
| + | * Kevin Peterson | ||
| + | |||
* Monica Harry (MH) | * Monica Harry (MH) | ||
* Senthil Nachimuthu (SN) | * Senthil Nachimuthu (SN) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* Frank Oemig (regrets) | * Frank Oemig (regrets) | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 17 April 2012
Contents
Minutes 17-Apr-2012
Roll Call and Agenda Check
- Ana Estelrich (AE)
- Russell Hamm (RH)
- Craig Stancl
- Kevin Peterson
- Monica Harry (MH)
- Senthil Nachimuthu (SN)
- Frank Oemig (regrets)
- No additional agenda items
Announcements
- RH - cts2.org currently redirects to apelon.com. This is being reworked to be more inclusive. One item being considered is a launcher page that would provide links to the various cts 2 activities such as the NOrmative work in HL7, the OMG PIM, implementation guides, the development framework, etc. What other options should we consider for the cts2.org page?
Action Item Review
- Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make voting rules official.
CTS 2 Milestones
- Discuss deliverable milestones and dates for CTS 2. Potential milestones include:
- Document outlining CTS 2 information and functional model alignment with HL7 Core Principles of vocabulary
- PIM->SFM matrix alignment (validate what functionality is/is not present in the PIM based on the SFM requirements. Document the rationalization of the design decisions made in the PIM
- HL7 terminology model (MIF based)
- Conformance profile for HL7 CTS 2
- Document from implementers outlining changes to the SFM functional requirements based on user experience
- Final document integrating the above
- …
