This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CTS2N - 3-April-12"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
** Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make this official. | ** Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make this official. | ||
| + | == Work Items Review == | ||
| + | * (AE) Functional requirement is not implemented in the PIM | ||
| + | ** Verify with PIM authors on weather we are correct or not. | ||
| + | ** Then what? | ||
| + | *** Exclude the requirement all together? | ||
| + | *** Add a section of the document that talks to why each requirement was not included in the PIM | ||
| + | *** Discuss the use of CTS 2 within the broader context of a terminology enabled application | ||
== Action items for Next Week == | == Action items for Next Week == | ||
# Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make voting rules official. | # Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make voting rules official. | ||
| + | # Ana will email to list | ||
Revision as of 14:39, 3 April 2012
Contents
Minutes 14-Feb-2012
Roll Call and Agenda Check
- Ana Estelrich (AE)
- Monica Harry (MH)
- Senthil Nachimuthu (SN)
- Russell Hamm (RH)
- Craig Stancl (regrets)
- Kevin Peterson (regrets)
- Frank Oemig (regrets)
- No additional agenda items
Announcements
- AE - Attended the OMG meeting two weeks ago. PHAST has implemented Read Only aspects of CTS 2 from the SFM, and had identified extensions and errata in the SFM. Quwstion is to identify how the OMG PIM aligns with the SFM. Would like to align with the international standard. PHAST comments on the OMG PIM are located on github [| here].
Action Item Review
CTS 2 Voting Rules
- By default I believe we adopt the Vocabulary WG calls. We will unlikely have 2 chairs on CTS 2 calls.
- (RH) Propose voting rules of one Vocabulary chair and three participants for binding votes.
- Aknowledged and agreed by all three members
- Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make this official.
Work Items Review
- (AE) Functional requirement is not implemented in the PIM
- Verify with PIM authors on weather we are correct or not.
- Then what?
- Exclude the requirement all together?
- Add a section of the document that talks to why each requirement was not included in the PIM
- Discuss the use of CTS 2 within the broader context of a terminology enabled application
Action items for Next Week
- Russ will follow up with HL7 on how we make voting rules official.
- Ana will email to list
