This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120201"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<nowiki>{{subst::MnM Template for Agenda-Minutes}}</nowiki>")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<nowiki>{{subst::MnM Template for Agenda-Minutes}}</nowiki>
+
[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes]]
 +
__NOTOC__
 +
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)=
 +
[[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]]
 +
 
 +
==Attendees==
 +
Lloyd McKenzie, Austin Kreisler, Brian Pech, Andy Stechisian
 +
 
 +
==Agenda==
 +
*Approve [[MnM_Minutes_WGM_201201_San_Antonio| San Antonio Minutes]]
 +
*Question from Austin
 +
*Scheduling future calls
 +
 
 +
==WGM Minutes==
 +
Approved: Andy/Austin: 3/0/0
 +
 
 +
==Question from Austin on orphan Role codes==
 +
There are a number of "orphan" codes in the RoleClass code system that are siblings of ROL instead of children.  Austin wondered if this was deliberate, if the codes were intended to be deprecated, or whether they accidentally lost their place in the hierarchy.  At the moment, the codes can't be referenced inside the design tools because they're not under ROL.
 +
 
 +
Lloyd confirmed it's an error for them to be there.  Austin will investigate and submit a harmonization proposal for this coming round
 +
 
 +
==Call scheduling==
 +
Deferred to next week when hopefully there will be more people in attendance due to DTR2 reconciliation discussion.
 +
 
 +
==Adjournment==
 +
Moved by Brian 16:15

Latest revision as of 23:04, 8 February 2012


M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)

Return to MnM Minutes

Attendees

Lloyd McKenzie, Austin Kreisler, Brian Pech, Andy Stechisian

Agenda

WGM Minutes

Approved: Andy/Austin: 3/0/0

Question from Austin on orphan Role codes

There are a number of "orphan" codes in the RoleClass code system that are siblings of ROL instead of children. Austin wondered if this was deliberate, if the codes were intended to be deprecated, or whether they accidentally lost their place in the hierarchy. At the moment, the codes can't be referenced inside the design tools because they're not under ROL.

Lloyd confirmed it's an error for them to be there. Austin will investigate and submit a harmonization proposal for this coming round

Call scheduling

Deferred to next week when hopefully there will be more people in attendance due to DTR2 reconciliation discussion.

Adjournment

Moved by Brian 16:15