This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2011-10-24 Rx Conf Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Julie James (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
* Outstanding Actions | * Outstanding Actions | ||
| − | + | **Hugh to send IDMP details to Derek | |
* Mailing List Topics | * Mailing List Topics | ||
* Balloting | * Balloting | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
** Name Parts (Update) | ** Name Parts (Update) | ||
** Regulatory Services Location | ** Regulatory Services Location | ||
| + | ** Reason Act Relationship | ||
* AOB | * AOB | ||
| + | ** Reconstitution act | ||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
| − | * | + | * Hugh (chair) |
| − | * | + | * Melva (scribe) |
| + | * John | ||
| + | * Rob | ||
| + | * Thiery | ||
| + | * Julie | ||
| + | * Jean | ||
| + | * Gerald | ||
| + | * Mead | ||
| + | * Tom | ||
| + | * Grace Clifford - Apelon | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Outstanding Actions== | ||
| + | * Hugh to send IDMP details to Derek | ||
| + | * Mailing List Topics | ||
| + | ** no priority topics - deferred | ||
| + | * Balloting | ||
| + | ** Republish status - deferred | ||
| + | ** Ballot Reconcilliation - deferred | ||
| + | ** NIB - co-chair needs to submit by Oct 30th | ||
| + | Melva will submit with Rob's help | ||
| + | * Project Scope Statements | ||
| + | ** Clinical Statement Review | ||
| + | ***deferred to next week | ||
| + | **hData - Gerald and Hugh | ||
| + | ***Pharmacy Service Profile - interest from Cerner and Kaiser | ||
| + | ***pick up one of our specifications - Hugh suggested Medication Statement - Gerald will take this back to those requesting the service profile | ||
| + | ***Cerner interested in service to describe compound medication (like an infusion) - retrieval of these from the service | ||
| + | ***Hugh thought that the intention of the project was to "prove a point" - prove the technology can be implemented rather than debating some of the definitions | ||
| + | ***rationale for putting SOA as primary group - don't have the knowledge of the pharmacy domain | ||
| + | ***proving the hData technology in the realm of pharmacy | ||
| + | ***most of the work is SOA related therefore should be leading - Pharmacy should be co-sponsor | ||
| + | *** See updated version of PSS | ||
| + | ***Moved by Gerald - seconded by Jean - that the draft PSS for the Pharmacy Service Implementation Guide is tentatively approved by Pharmacy WG pending changes from SOA WG | ||
| + | ****CARRIED - 10 for/ 0 against/1 abstention | ||
| + | ****Will come back to us after SOA updates - will come back meeting in 2 weeks time | ||
| + | *Harmonisation proposals (for CPM) - see Harmonization Proposals | ||
| + | **Contact Party Role | ||
| + | ***add a concept domain to Role Code - "contact role type" | ||
| + | **Frequency Observation Type | ||
| + | ***Concept domain for generic expression of frequency observation | ||
| + | **Medication Safety Report Observation Type | ||
| + | ***new concept domain as a child of "medication observation type" | ||
| + | **Moved by Jean - seconded by Mead to accept these 3 harmonization proposals - Contact Party Role, Frequency Observation Type and Medication Safety Report Observation Type) | ||
| + | *** Carried - 10 for/ 0 against/1 abstention | ||
| + | **Regulation Policy Act Type | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | **Therapy Relationship Type | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | **Disease Category | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | **Disease Qualifier | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | **Indication Type | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | **Issue | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | **Name Parts (Update) | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | **Regulatory Services Location | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | **Reason Act Relationship | ||
| + | ***deferred | ||
| + | *AOB | ||
| + | **Reconstitution act - | ||
| + | ***in CPM - class has business name of "reconstitution" | ||
| + | ***not really an act, but a procedure - want to constrain it | ||
| + | ***Concept domain - doesn't exist | ||
| + | ***Julie will create the concept domain | ||
| + | ***Mead has posted a question to list - has a proposal to start the discussion | ||
| + | ***don't expect this to take teleconference time | ||
| + | ***Jean suggested contacting Graeme in Australia as he has been doing similar things | ||
| + | ***we will add to this as a mailing topic item - for 2 weeks | ||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 31 October 2011
Contents |
Related Links |
Agenda
- Outstanding Actions
- Hugh to send IDMP details to Derek
- Mailing List Topics
- Balloting
- Republish status
- NIB
- BallotReconcilliation
- Project Scope Statements
- Clinical Statement Review
- hData
- Harmonisation proposals (for CPM)
- Contact Party Role
- Frequency Observation Type
- Regulation Policy Act Type
- Therapy Relationship Type
- Disease Category
- Disease Qualifier
- Indication Type
- Issue
- Name Parts (Update)
- Regulatory Services Location
- Reason Act Relationship
- AOB
- Reconstitution act
Attendees
- Hugh (chair)
- Melva (scribe)
- John
- Rob
- Thiery
- Julie
- Jean
- Gerald
- Mead
- Tom
- Grace Clifford - Apelon
Outstanding Actions
- Hugh to send IDMP details to Derek
- Mailing List Topics
- no priority topics - deferred
- Balloting
- Republish status - deferred
- Ballot Reconcilliation - deferred
- NIB - co-chair needs to submit by Oct 30th
Melva will submit with Rob's help
- Project Scope Statements
- Clinical Statement Review
- deferred to next week
- hData - Gerald and Hugh
- Pharmacy Service Profile - interest from Cerner and Kaiser
- pick up one of our specifications - Hugh suggested Medication Statement - Gerald will take this back to those requesting the service profile
- Cerner interested in service to describe compound medication (like an infusion) - retrieval of these from the service
- Hugh thought that the intention of the project was to "prove a point" - prove the technology can be implemented rather than debating some of the definitions
- rationale for putting SOA as primary group - don't have the knowledge of the pharmacy domain
- proving the hData technology in the realm of pharmacy
- most of the work is SOA related therefore should be leading - Pharmacy should be co-sponsor
- See updated version of PSS
- Moved by Gerald - seconded by Jean - that the draft PSS for the Pharmacy Service Implementation Guide is tentatively approved by Pharmacy WG pending changes from SOA WG
- CARRIED - 10 for/ 0 against/1 abstention
- Will come back to us after SOA updates - will come back meeting in 2 weeks time
- Clinical Statement Review
- Harmonisation proposals (for CPM) - see Harmonization Proposals
- Contact Party Role
- add a concept domain to Role Code - "contact role type"
- Frequency Observation Type
- Concept domain for generic expression of frequency observation
- Medication Safety Report Observation Type
- new concept domain as a child of "medication observation type"
- Moved by Jean - seconded by Mead to accept these 3 harmonization proposals - Contact Party Role, Frequency Observation Type and Medication Safety Report Observation Type)
- Carried - 10 for/ 0 against/1 abstention
- Regulation Policy Act Type
- deferred
- Therapy Relationship Type
- deferred
- Disease Category
- deferred
- Disease Qualifier
- deferred
- Indication Type
- deferred
- Issue
- deferred
- Name Parts (Update)
- deferred
- Regulatory Services Location
- deferred
- Reason Act Relationship
- deferred
- Contact Party Role
- AOB
- Reconstitution act -
- in CPM - class has business name of "reconstitution"
- not really an act, but a procedure - want to constrain it
- Concept domain - doesn't exist
- Julie will create the concept domain
- Mead has posted a question to list - has a proposal to start the discussion
- don't expect this to take teleconference time
- Jean suggested contacting Graeme in Australia as he has been doing similar things
- we will add to this as a mailing topic item - for 2 weeks
- Reconstitution act -
