This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR058-706 Document Payload in Orders"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Accepted Change Requests}} |
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Accepted V2.8 Change Requests}} |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Issue == | == Issue == | ||
| − | See 2.8 change request [[File:OO CR058- | + | See 2.8 change request [[File:OO CR058-706.doc]] for problem definition and proposal. |
== Recommendation == | == Recommendation == | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | 26 May 2011 | ||
| + | *TXD needs to go through Struc Doc. | ||
| + | *As order evolves one gets new snapshots of the document so care must be given to whether to manage with detailed segments or document based. | ||
| + | *Suggestion to only allow for one of the two paths, i.e., only use document level state management. | ||
| + | *Motion to accept proposal with TXD through Struc Doc, limit document level state management, addition of reference pointer. Austin Kreisler, Rob Savage. | ||
| + | **Against: 0; Abstain: 6; In Favor:7 | ||
| + | 16 June 2011 | ||
| + | *Struc Doc advised to use TXA instead of TXD. | ||
| + | **Move to accept Struc Doe advice, Austin, Rob Savage | ||
| + | ***Against: 0; Abstain: 1; In Favor. 6 | ||
| + | |||
{{OO Open Change Requests}} | {{OO Open Change Requests}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:51, 6 July 2011
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Hans Buitendijk | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: May 19, 2011 | Change request ID: OO CR058 |
| Standard/IG: 2.8 Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
See 2.8 change request File:OO CR058-706.doc for problem definition and proposal.
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
26 May 2011
- TXD needs to go through Struc Doc.
- As order evolves one gets new snapshots of the document so care must be given to whether to manage with detailed segments or document based.
- Suggestion to only allow for one of the two paths, i.e., only use document level state management.
- Motion to accept proposal with TXD through Struc Doc, limit document level state management, addition of reference pointer. Austin Kreisler, Rob Savage.
- Against: 0; Abstain: 6; In Favor:7
16 June 2011
- Struc Doc advised to use TXA instead of TXD.
- Move to accept Struc Doe advice, Austin, Rob Savage
- Against: 0; Abstain: 1; In Favor. 6
- Move to accept Struc Doe advice, Austin, Rob Savage
