This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR058-706 Document Payload in Orders"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
+ | 26 May 2011 | ||
+ | *TXD needs to go through Struc Doc. | ||
+ | *As order evolves one gets new snapshots of the document so care must be given to whether to manage with detailed segments or document based. | ||
+ | *Suggestion to only allow for one of the two paths, i.e., only use document level state management. | ||
+ | *Motion to accept proposal with TXD through Struc Doc, limit document level state management, addition of reference pointer. Austin Kreisler, Rob Savage. | ||
+ | **Against: 0; Abstain: 6; In Favor:7 | ||
+ | |||
{{OO Open Change Requests}} | {{OO Open Change Requests}} |
Revision as of 21:37, 26 May 2011
Return to OO Change Requests page.
Submitted by: Hans Buitendijk | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
Submitted date: May 19, 2011 | Change request ID: OO CR058 |
Standard/IG: 2.8 Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
See 2.8 change request File:OO CR058-706.doc for problem definition and proposal.
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
26 May 2011
- TXD needs to go through Struc Doc.
- As order evolves one gets new snapshots of the document so care must be given to whether to manage with detailed segments or document based.
- Suggestion to only allow for one of the two paths, i.e., only use document level state management.
- Motion to accept proposal with TXD through Struc Doc, limit document level state management, addition of reference pointer. Austin Kreisler, Rob Savage.
- Against: 0; Abstain: 6; In Favor:7