Difference between revisions of "March 22, 2011 Security Conference Call"
(Created page with "=Security Working Group Meeting= * Meeting Information Back to Security Main Page ==Attendees== * [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-...") |
(→Agenda) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda | #''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda | ||
− | #''(15 min)'' ''' | + | #''(15 min)'' '''final ballot content for the May cycle is due on Sunday, March 27''' Follow through on the notification of intent to ballot the Security and Privacy Ontology material.''' ~ Tony Weida |
− | #''(15 min)'' ''' | + | #''(15 min)'' '''Alignment with MVCO''' |
− | #''( | + | #''' New Items''' |
− | + | #''(5 min)'' '''Call for Agenda Items [[May 2011 Working Group Meeting - Orlando, Florida USA, Security WG Agenda]] ''' | |
+ | |||
+ | ==Meeting Minutes== | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Final ballot content for the May cycle is due on Sunday, March 27''' | ||
+ | '''Alignment with MVCO''' | ||
+ | ''(continued from last week)'' Jaime Delgado agreed with the detail of alignment between the two ontologies and sent several pages of text to Tony (MVCO group is generally in agreement with the alignment and to not to go specifically with only one ontology) Jaime will send a shorter description later this week for use in the Security and Privacy Ontology ballot draft material. Note: MVCO group was not on the call this week for further discussion. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Notification of intent to ballot the Security and Privacy Ontology material.''' | ||
+ | Report Update given: | ||
+ | * An inquiry about aligning the ontology with SAIF was sent to Galen Mulrooney, (It has been mentioned on past Security-CBCC calls as a likely source of information). | ||
+ | ** ''Status: Response received from Galen.'' Comments have been incorporated into document paragraph. | ||
+ | * Tony received comment back from Cliff Thompson, Jim Buckner and Cecil Lynch have been contacted to review the document paragraph regarding SAIF | ||
+ | * A suggestion was also made to ping co-Chair Bernd Blobel as well. | ||
+ | ** '''ACTION ITEM:''' Tony to contact Bernd regarding SAIF paragraph to be submitted in Security and Privacy Ontology document'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Minor changes have been made on the document. | ||
+ | ** Clarification to the text definitions are intended to be brief summaries for the reader as well as consistent with the longer discussion in the reference sources including the HL7 RBAC Permission Catalog, Security and Privacy DAM and the ANSI-RBAC material. | ||
+ | ** Input for acknowledgments for identified contributors need to be added. | ||
+ | ** Update to OWL files with date and descriptions to be completed and confirmed they are consistent with the document. | ||
+ | ** Tony would also like to address any straightforward comments that come in. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The last question posed to the group is--does the group wish to push forward with the ballot material to get input from the HL7 community? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mike - It seems that we need Steering Division approval to push forward with this. Steering Division meets on Tuesday just prior to our weekly meeting. (John and Mike to take Action Item to contact Steering Division to move ballot material forward) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Submission deadline for Ballot is March 27 - this Sunday. The document has been updated, we will need to provide the updated document and the updated OWL files before the deadline. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''NEW ITEM''' - A discussion was held at HIMSS between Mike, Ioana and Richard to revisit the HL7 confidentiality codes. ACTION: Suzanne as CBCC co-chair to bring this information forward to the CBCC group as a possible new project; Security would be an interested party for this effort | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Call for Agenda Items [[May 2011 Working Group Meeting - Orlando, Florida USA, Security WG Agenda]] ''' | ||
+ | |||
==Action Items== | ==Action Items== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Meeting adjourned at 10:23 PST | ||
+ | |||
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]] | [[Security|Back to Security Main Page]] |
Latest revision as of 05:21, 12 April 2011
Contents
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- Jon Farmer
- Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- John Moehrke Security Co-chair
- Diana Proud-Madruga
- Serafina Versaggi
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (15 min) final ballot content for the May cycle is due on Sunday, March 27 Follow through on the notification of intent to ballot the Security and Privacy Ontology material. ~ Tony Weida
- (15 min) Alignment with MVCO
- New Items
- (5 min) Call for Agenda Items May 2011 Working Group Meeting - Orlando, Florida USA, Security WG Agenda
Meeting Minutes
Final ballot content for the May cycle is due on Sunday, March 27 Alignment with MVCO (continued from last week) Jaime Delgado agreed with the detail of alignment between the two ontologies and sent several pages of text to Tony (MVCO group is generally in agreement with the alignment and to not to go specifically with only one ontology) Jaime will send a shorter description later this week for use in the Security and Privacy Ontology ballot draft material. Note: MVCO group was not on the call this week for further discussion.
Notification of intent to ballot the Security and Privacy Ontology material. Report Update given:
- An inquiry about aligning the ontology with SAIF was sent to Galen Mulrooney, (It has been mentioned on past Security-CBCC calls as a likely source of information).
- Status: Response received from Galen. Comments have been incorporated into document paragraph.
- Tony received comment back from Cliff Thompson, Jim Buckner and Cecil Lynch have been contacted to review the document paragraph regarding SAIF
- A suggestion was also made to ping co-Chair Bernd Blobel as well.
- ACTION ITEM: Tony to contact Bernd regarding SAIF paragraph to be submitted in Security and Privacy Ontology document
- Minor changes have been made on the document.
- Clarification to the text definitions are intended to be brief summaries for the reader as well as consistent with the longer discussion in the reference sources including the HL7 RBAC Permission Catalog, Security and Privacy DAM and the ANSI-RBAC material.
- Input for acknowledgments for identified contributors need to be added.
- Update to OWL files with date and descriptions to be completed and confirmed they are consistent with the document.
- Tony would also like to address any straightforward comments that come in.
The last question posed to the group is--does the group wish to push forward with the ballot material to get input from the HL7 community?
Mike - It seems that we need Steering Division approval to push forward with this. Steering Division meets on Tuesday just prior to our weekly meeting. (John and Mike to take Action Item to contact Steering Division to move ballot material forward)
Submission deadline for Ballot is March 27 - this Sunday. The document has been updated, we will need to provide the updated document and the updated OWL files before the deadline.
NEW ITEM - A discussion was held at HIMSS between Mike, Ioana and Richard to revisit the HL7 confidentiality codes. ACTION: Suzanne as CBCC co-chair to bring this information forward to the CBCC group as a possible new project; Security would be an interested party for this effort
Call for Agenda Items May 2011 Working Group Meeting - Orlando, Florida USA, Security WG Agenda
Action Items
Meeting adjourned at 10:23 PST