Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20110323"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
EDITORS - When converting the content from Agenda to minutes: | EDITORS - When converting the content from Agenda to minutes: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
2) Delete the Logistics template reference | 2) Delete the Logistics template reference | ||
{{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}} below | {{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}} below | ||
| − | -->[[Category:2011 MnM Minutes | + | -->[[Category:2011 MnM Minutes]] |
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= | =M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= | ||
| − | |||
[[:Category:2011 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | [[:Category:2011 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
*Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20110316| Minutes Prior Meeting on 3/16]] | *Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20110316| Minutes Prior Meeting on 3/16]] | ||
*Over-looked Core Principles Ballot Reconciliation Item | *Over-looked Core Principles Ballot Reconciliation Item | ||
| − | + | ==Attendees== | |
| + | Kreisler, Savage, Beeler, Stechishin, Seppala, Pech, McKenzie | ||
==Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20110316| Minutes Prior Meeting on 3/16]]== | ==Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20110316| Minutes Prior Meeting on 3/16]]== | ||
| − | + | MInutes approved - Kreisler/Seppala unanimious | |
==MISSED Core Principles Ballot Items - Reconciliation== | ==MISSED Core Principles Ballot Items - Reconciliation== | ||
Two items were missed in the final processing of [http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/ballots/2010SEP/reconciliation/recon_v3_cppv3models_r1_n4_2010sep.xls Ballot Reconciliation for Core Principles]. | Two items were missed in the final processing of [http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/ballots/2010SEP/reconciliation/recon_v3_cppv3models_r1_n4_2010sep.xls Ballot Reconciliation for Core Principles]. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
Items 188 and 189 - Have a "B" comment grouping (meaning Beeler should have dealt with them). They were marked that way because they had '''no chapter designation''' and talked about "The model...". When reviewed them, we realized they were talking about the "Vocabulary Model" and marked them to the "Vocab Work Group", but failed to tell Vocab. | Items 188 and 189 - Have a "B" comment grouping (meaning Beeler should have dealt with them). They were marked that way because they had '''no chapter designation''' and talked about "The model...". When reviewed them, we realized they were talking about the "Vocabulary Model" and marked them to the "Vocab Work Group", but failed to tell Vocab. | ||
===Item 188 [at 5/0.0] (B Neg-Mj) 0/0/0=== | ===Item 188 [at 5/0.0] (B Neg-Mj) 0/0/0=== | ||
| + | '''Moved/Seconded/Vote McKenzie, Savage 6-0-0''' | ||
=====Voter Comment===== | =====Voter Comment===== | ||
The model should support cross-mapping terms that mean the same thing within a coding system and across coding systems. | The model should support cross-mapping terms that mean the same thing within a coding system and across coding systems. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
===Item 189 [at 5/0.0] (B Neg-Mj) 0/0/0=== | ===Item 189 [at 5/0.0] (B Neg-Mj) 0/0/0=== | ||
| + | '''Moved/Seconded/Vote McKenzie, Savage 6-0-0''' | ||
=====Voter Comment===== | =====Voter Comment===== | ||
The model should support the ability to subset a group of concepts. For example, I have a concept of Specimen Type and a subordinate grouping of these that represent a specimen obtained from a patient (i.e. blood, urine liver tissue etc.) and genetic sample type extracted (i.e. RNA, DNA, mRNA, rDNA, GDNA, snRNA …). | The model should support the ability to subset a group of concepts. For example, I have a concept of Specimen Type and a subordinate grouping of these that represent a specimen obtained from a patient (i.e. blood, urine liver tissue etc.) and genetic sample type extracted (i.e. RNA, DNA, mRNA, rDNA, GDNA, snRNA …). | ||
Revision as of 18:56, 26 March 2011
M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)
Agenda
- Approve Minutes Prior Meeting on 3/16
- Over-looked Core Principles Ballot Reconciliation Item
Attendees
Kreisler, Savage, Beeler, Stechishin, Seppala, Pech, McKenzie
Approve Minutes Prior Meeting on 3/16
MInutes approved - Kreisler/Seppala unanimious
MISSED Core Principles Ballot Items - Reconciliation
Two items were missed in the final processing of Ballot Reconciliation for Core Principles.
Items 188 and 189 - Have a "B" comment grouping (meaning Beeler should have dealt with them). They were marked that way because they had no chapter designation and talked about "The model...". When reviewed them, we realized they were talking about the "Vocabulary Model" and marked them to the "Vocab Work Group", but failed to tell Vocab.
Item 188 [at 5/0.0] (B Neg-Mj) 0/0/0
Moved/Seconded/Vote McKenzie, Savage 6-0-0
Voter Comment
The model should support cross-mapping terms that mean the same thing within a coding system and across coding systems.
Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Not persuasive with mod"
We propose to include the following in 5.3.3 "The vocabulary model presented here is a high-level model reflecting only those relationships defined in this specification. The complete vocabulary model, developed in support of Common Terminology Service Release 2, and the HL7 Model Interchange Format (MIF) can be reviewed as part of the MIF Informative Document . <LINK this to the MIF document>"
To the voter - the complete model is much richer and includes both properties and relationships that allow the sorts of functionality that you cite.
Item 189 [at 5/0.0] (B Neg-Mj) 0/0/0
Moved/Seconded/Vote McKenzie, Savage 6-0-0
Voter Comment
The model should support the ability to subset a group of concepts. For example, I have a concept of Specimen Type and a subordinate grouping of these that represent a specimen obtained from a patient (i.e. blood, urine liver tissue etc.) and genetic sample type extracted (i.e. RNA, DNA, mRNA, rDNA, GDNA, snRNA …).
Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Not persuasive with mod"
As preceding
Management of CMETs - proposal from TSC (Austin)
Review Action Items For MnM
Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items:
