This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "March 15, 2011 Security Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
+
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call, (Approve Minutes - March 8 in progress, not completed) & Accept Agenda
 
#''(15 min)'' '''Review updates to the draft [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6185/8126/HL7SecurityandPrivacyOntology.pdf Security and Privacy Ontology document]''' Note: ''Earlier version has been removed'' - Tony Weida
 
#''(15 min)'' '''Review updates to the draft [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6185/8126/HL7SecurityandPrivacyOntology.pdf Security and Privacy Ontology document]''' Note: ''Earlier version has been removed'' - Tony Weida
 
#''(15 min)'' '''Review proposed [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6194/8145/RevisedDescriptionsofClassesintheSecurityandPrivacyOntology.docx Revised Text descriptions of Classes] ''' - Tony Weida
 
#''(15 min)'' '''Review proposed [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6194/8145/RevisedDescriptionsofClassesintheSecurityandPrivacyOntology.docx Revised Text descriptions of Classes] ''' - Tony Weida

Revision as of 16:35, 15 March 2011

Security Working Group Meeting

Back to Security Main Page

==Attendees== (expected)

Back to Security Main Page


Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, (Approve Minutes - March 8 in progress, not completed) & Accept Agenda
  2. (15 min) Review updates to the draft Security and Privacy Ontology document Note: Earlier version has been removed - Tony Weida
  3. (15 min) Review proposed Revised Text descriptions of Classes - Tony Weida
  4. (15 min) DMAG comments to the “HL7 SECURITY AND PRIVACY ONTOLOGY – MAY 2011 INFORMATIVE BALLOT”, 2011/03/14
  5. Action Item: An inquiry about aligning the ontology with SAIF was sent to Galen Mulrooney, (It has been mentioned on past Security-CBCC calls as a likely source of information). Status: Awaiting response from Galen.
  6. Action Item: A paragraph was presented at the March 8th Security-CBCC meeting; comments were requested from the group but to date we have received none. So, a couple questions:

1. Does the draft paragraph match your understanding?

2. Should I ask other people for input, and if so, who?

  1. (5 min) Other Business - Request for Agenda Items for HL7 Working Group Meeting - May 2011, Orlando, Florida

Action Items

Back to Security Main Page