This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "CS Meeting Minutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==December 3, 2010==
 
==December 3, 2010==
 
Attendees: Rik Smithies, Hans Buitendijk, Rob Hausam
 
Attendees: Rik Smithies, Hans Buitendijk, Rob Hausam
 +
*January WGM Agenda
 +
**
 +
*CS and Pharmacy
 +
 
==November 12, 2010==
 
==November 12, 2010==
 
Attendees: Rik Smithies, Hans Buitendijk
 
Attendees: Rik Smithies, Hans Buitendijk
 
*Decision Making Document
 
*Decision Making Document
 
**We finalized proposed updates to the Decision Making Document template to fit Clinical Statement.
 
**We finalized proposed updates to the Decision Making Document template to fit Clinical Statement.
**The
+
**The updated version is attached - [[Image:CSWG Decisionmaking practices v2.0.doc]]
 +
**With these updates and the Mission/Vision update, Hans will send out these documents for e-vote.
 
*CS and Pharmacy alignment - Rik
 
*CS and Pharmacy alignment - Rik
 +
**Not discussed
 
*Work on the pattern
 
*Work on the pattern
**update to new RIM
+
**Not discussed
**start refactoring the model according to the plan
+
**Required steps:
**creation of CMETs - need to be able to publish these
+
***update to new RIM
 +
*****start refactoring the model according to the plan
 +
***creation of CMETs - need to be able to publish these
 
*Ballot plans
 
*Ballot plans
**publishing - do we need to be using a new method yet (MIF based?)
+
**Not discussed
**attribute level descriptions
+
**Required steps:
 +
***publishing - do we need to be using a new method yet (MIF based?)
 +
***attribute level descriptions
  
 
==November 5, 2010==
 
==November 5, 2010==

Revision as of 15:37, 6 December 2010

December 3, 2010

Attendees: Rik Smithies, Hans Buitendijk, Rob Hausam

  • January WGM Agenda
  • CS and Pharmacy

November 12, 2010

Attendees: Rik Smithies, Hans Buitendijk

  • Decision Making Document
    • We finalized proposed updates to the Decision Making Document template to fit Clinical Statement.
    • The updated version is attached - File:CSWG Decisionmaking practices v2.0.doc
    • With these updates and the Mission/Vision update, Hans will send out these documents for e-vote.
  • CS and Pharmacy alignment - Rik
    • Not discussed
  • Work on the pattern
    • Not discussed
    • Required steps:
      • update to new RIM
          • start refactoring the model according to the plan
      • creation of CMETs - need to be able to publish these
  • Ballot plans
    • Not discussed
    • Required steps:
      • publishing - do we need to be using a new method yet (MIF based?)
      • attribute level descriptions

November 5, 2010

  • Admin
    • Co-chair elections are happening January for me and Hans, but I don't think action is needed, HQ deals with it all.
      • Hans to check who to submit the nomination to.
    • Workgroup health items
      • Hans to check that all minutes are posted.
      • Mission/charter up to date (and with review date)
        • Current: Continued evolution of a clinical statement model that enables different workgroups to consistently incorporate clinical statement patterns in their domain.
        • New: Continued evolution of a clinical statement model that enables different workgroups to consistently incorporate clinical statement patterns in their domain as templates, CMETs, or other valid methods.
        • Out for doodle poll. Then to SSD + Dave Hamill/Lynn Laakso.
      • Review decision making practices new version - Template, Draft:File:CSWG Decisionmaking practices v2.0.doc
        • We want to link from website to wiki page. How do we do that? Hans to check.
    • Need to get clarity on Project Health measure on con call minutes. Not meeting or no quorum does not mean not healthy.
  • Work on the pattern
    • update to new RIM
    • start refactoring the model according to the plan
    • creation of CMETs - need to be able to publish these
  • Ballot plans
    • publishing - do we need to be using a new method yet (MIF based?)
    • attribute level descriptions