This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR031-651 Infusion Segment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) (New page: {{OO Open Change Requests}} {{OO Open V2.8 Change Requests}} Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 border=1 || '''Su...) |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) m (OO CR031-Infusion Segment moved to OO CR031-651 Infusion Segment) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Accepted Change Requests}} |
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Accepted V2.8 Change Requests}} |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:20, 18 June 2010
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Gary Meyer | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: 3-May-2010 | Change request ID: OO CR031 |
| Standard/IG: Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
See File:OO CR031-651.doc for problem definition and proposal.
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
- 18-May-2010
- Various updates.
- Suggest to check lengths
- % issue on amount/amount units – This requires a separate discussion as it touches all other like segments
- Is NM to CQ backwards compatible?
- The proposal received a lot of review in the devices workgroup.
- Add Action Code field per new segment in first or second place.
- Suggestion to add at the end, unless more logically put elsewhere.
- Add PRT where needed (modeled after V2.7)
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
- 18-May-2010
- Motion: Accept as proposed (with modifications discussed) and will return for additional adjustments if the adjustments are substantive (e.g., normative lengths). Gary, Todd.
- Against: 0; Abstain: 3; In Favor: 15
