This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR022-639 Deprecate OM1-16"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) (New page: {{OO Open Change Requests}} {{OO Open V2.8 Change Requests}} Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 border=1 || '''Su...) |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) m (OO CR022-Deprecate OM1-16 moved to OO CR022-639 Deprecate OM1-16) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Accepted Change Requests}} |
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Accepted V2.8 Change Requests}} |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:18, 18 June 2010
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Ken McCaslin | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: 19-Jan-2010 | Change request ID: OO CR022 |
| Standard/IG: Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
See File:OO CR022-639.doc for problem definition and proposal.
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
- 19-Jan-2010
- ASTM has stopped publishing Table 15, so reference is no longer valid.
- Use HL7 table instead (per proposal 633).
- Austin reviewed inter-version compatibility rules. Can remove reference to ASTM Table 15 reference using the existing field, but may need a ruling from INM for this. Item number would have to be changed.
- Modify proposal to change status of field OM1-16 to “retain for backward compatibility”.
- Motion: Proposal as modified above to change status of OM1-16. Ken McCaslin, Gary Meyer
- Against: 0; Abstain: 0: In Favor: 9
