This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This Page was initiated by Russ Hamm May 17, 2010 | This Page was initiated by Russ Hamm May 17, 2010 | ||
| − | I moved two prior Harmonization-related sub-items (that had been listed under MnM on the "Main page") here, because as this page is completed, this is where those links belong. [[User:Gwbeeler|GWBeeler]] | + | I moved two prior Harmonization-related sub-items (that had been listed under MnM on the "[[Main Page|Main page]]") here, because as this page is completed, this is where those links belong. [[User:Gwbeeler|GWBeeler]] |
*[[Wiki Template for Harmonization Proposal|Harmonization Wiki Template]] | *[[Wiki Template for Harmonization Proposal|Harmonization Wiki Template]] | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 28 May 2010
This Page was initiated by Russ Hamm May 17, 2010
I moved two prior Harmonization-related sub-items (that had been listed under MnM on the "Main page") here, because as this page is completed, this is where those links belong. GWBeeler
- Harmonization Wiki Template
- This template came into being in 2006, but has never been formally used as a harmonization source path. I (GWBeeler) suggest this be dropped for the following reason(s):
- The current proposal management process is highly dependent upon being able to extract 'specific data fields from the Word document, and the Wiki template has no facilities that lend themselves to reliable automated parsing.
- We should focus current improvements on the updating of the Word "template"
- This template came into being in 2006, but has never been formally used as a harmonization source path. I (GWBeeler) suggest this be dropped for the following reason(s):
- Vocabulary Harmonization Tool
- The Vocabulary Maintenance Language remains a main-stay of vocabulary harmonization processing, but the specific tool linked from here has no active users, and therefore, I (GWBeeler) suggest this link be dropped.
