This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20071005"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[Category:2007 MnM Minutes]] | ||
=M&M Conference Call, October 5, 2007= | =M&M Conference Call, October 5, 2007= | ||
(for more detail refer to [http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/MnM_Schedule meeting schedule]) | (for more detail refer to [http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/MnM_Schedule meeting schedule]) | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
*Editing Project Peer Review (Ioana) | *Editing Project Peer Review (Ioana) | ||
| + | ** Peer review form to complete and e-mail to Jay:[http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/images/f/fe/PeerReviewForm_%282%29.doc Peer Review Form] | ||
| + | ** Document to review.[http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/images/4/43/RIM_Document_Assessment_08.doc RIM Assessment document ] | ||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
Sarah Ryan, Jay Lyle, Dale Nelson, Ioana Singureanu | Sarah Ryan, Jay Lyle, Dale Nelson, Ioana Singureanu | ||
| − | == | + | ==Meeting Notes== |
| − | + | Jay provided an overview of the process, objectives, and scope of the editing project and, specifically, the RIM editing activities.The editing project is intended to address confusing, incorrect, incomplete guidance, omissions - in the core specifications (RIM and Vocabulary for now). This effort of editing the documentation should be an on-going, operational effort in the future. For now, the project team is attemptiong to fix problem with the existing materials. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The editing project is intended to address confusing, incorrect, incomplete guidance, omissions - in the core specifications (RIM and Vocabulary for now). This effort of editing the documentation should be an on-going, operational effort in the future. For now, the project team is attemptiong to fix problem with the existing materials. | ||
# We need to agree on the criteria listed in the "RIM Assessment Document" | # We need to agree on the criteria listed in the "RIM Assessment Document" | ||
# Close the peer review of the "RIM Assessment Document" by Nov. 3rd | # Close the peer review of the "RIM Assessment Document" by Nov. 3rd | ||
# Review the documents and provide the following: | # Review the documents and provide the following: | ||
| − | ## A copy of the original text with tracking turned on edits marked to illustrate the changes | + | ##A copy of the original text with tracking turned on edits marked to illustrate the changes |
| − | ## List of issues and omissions (keyed to the page and line number) | + | ##List of issues and omissions (keyed to the page and line number) |
| Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
Dale to provide Jay the WARTS materials. | Dale to provide Jay the WARTS materials. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Ioana13|Ioana13]] 14:30, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:54, 21 May 2010
Contents
M&M Conference Call, October 5, 2007
(for more detail refer to meeting schedule)
Agenda
- Editing Project Peer Review (Ioana)
- Peer review form to complete and e-mail to Jay:Peer Review Form
- Document to review.RIM Assessment document
Attendees
Sarah Ryan, Jay Lyle, Dale Nelson, Ioana Singureanu
Meeting Notes
Jay provided an overview of the process, objectives, and scope of the editing project and, specifically, the RIM editing activities.The editing project is intended to address confusing, incorrect, incomplete guidance, omissions - in the core specifications (RIM and Vocabulary for now). This effort of editing the documentation should be an on-going, operational effort in the future. For now, the project team is attemptiong to fix problem with the existing materials.
- We need to agree on the criteria listed in the "RIM Assessment Document"
- Close the peer review of the "RIM Assessment Document" by Nov. 3rd
- Review the documents and provide the following:
- A copy of the original text with tracking turned on edits marked to illustrate the changes
- List of issues and omissions (keyed to the page and line number)
Open issue
If the semantics are clarified, how are those clarifications going to be verified in all the specification that use the clarified concepts?
Action Items:
Dale to provide Jay the WARTS materials.
--Ioana13 14:30, 5 October 2007 (CDT)
