This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "February 2nd 2010 Security Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:
 
#**Security DAM
 
#**Security DAM
 
#**CDA R2 Implementation Guide for Consent Directives
 
#**CDA R2 Implementation Guide for Consent Directives
 +
#**PASS-Alpha Access Control
 
#*New Projects
 
#*New Projects
 
#** [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5447/6879/HL7ProjectScopeStatementv2010JanSecurityandPrivacyOntology.doc Security and Privacy Ontology Scope Statement]
 
#** [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5447/6879/HL7ProjectScopeStatementv2010JanSecurityandPrivacyOntology.doc Security and Privacy Ontology Scope Statement]
Line 42: Line 43:
 
====Status of Security & CBCCC response to MU IFR====
 
====Status of Security & CBCCC response to MU IFR====
 
*Deadline for response is March 15
 
*Deadline for response is March 15
*Serafina to check with HL7 leadership to determine process for submitting comments through HL7 official channels
+
*Mike noted that many in this committee are responding to the IFR from their parent organization’s perspective
*Please read [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5459/6897/HHSMU_Standards1IFR.pdf MU IFR] and come prepared with comments to next Tuesday’s meeting
+
*Bill Braithwaite reported that HL7 will be submitting a consolidated response for aspects of comments that are HL7 standards specific.  An electronic process for submitting work group comments to the HL7 committee is reportedly to be established
 +
*Serafina to check with HL7 leadership and will report back on process for submitting comments to HL7
 +
*Please read [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5459/6897/HHSMU_Standards1IFR.pdf MU IFR] in advance of next Tuesday’s meeting and bring your comments
 
====Ballot Reconciliation====
 
====Ballot Reconciliation====
*Security DAM ballot resolution took place in joint session with Security,CBCC and SOA WGs
+
*Security DAM ballot resolution took place in joint session with Security, CBCC and SOA WGs
*Comments disposed at the WGM.   
+
**Comments disposed at the WGM.   
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5460/6898/V3DAM_SECURITY_R1_I1_2010JAN_consolidated_votes_20100127.xlsx Consolidated ballot comments/vote] posted on GForge and notification sent to the Security list on 1/27/2010
+
**Security list notification sent on 1/27/2010, and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5460/6898/V3DAM_SECURITY_R1_I1_2010JAN_consolidated_votes_20100127.xlsx consolidated ballot comments/vote] posted on GForge
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5444/6872/CDAR2_IG_CONSENTDIR_R1_D1_2010JAN_CONSOLIDATED_20100131allvotes.xls CDA R2 IG For CD] –comments resolved during WGM
 +
*SOA – PASS Access Control ballot –comments resolved during WGM
 
====New Projects====
 
====New Projects====
*
+
*Medical device security in distributed systems
 +
**Scope statement crafted during the meeting
 +
**Health Care Devices (HCD) to sponsor; Security WG will co-sponsor along with other WGs
 +
**Scope statement will be sent to HCD for approval for September 2010 ballot

Revision as of 22:02, 7 February 2010

Security Work Group Weekly Conference Call

Meeting Information

Attendees

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call & Call for Additional Agenda Items
  2. (55 min) Report Out from Phoenix Working Group Meeting

1. Action Items:

  • Serafina to follow up with HL7 leadership to determine process for submitting WG response to MU IFR
  • Team: please read MU IFR (focus on pages 81-94 and Table 2B) and provide comments at next Tuesday's meeting

2. Report Out from Phoenix WGM

Announcements - Elections

  • John Moerhke elected Security Co-Chair
  • Mike Davis re-elected Security Co-Chair
  • Steve Connolly appointed Vocabulary Facilitator for Security WG

Status of Security & CBCCC response to MU IFR

  • Deadline for response is March 15
  • Mike noted that many in this committee are responding to the IFR from their parent organization’s perspective
  • Bill Braithwaite reported that HL7 will be submitting a consolidated response for aspects of comments that are HL7 standards specific. An electronic process for submitting work group comments to the HL7 committee is reportedly to be established
  • Serafina to check with HL7 leadership and will report back on process for submitting comments to HL7
  • Please read MU IFR in advance of next Tuesday’s meeting and bring your comments

Ballot Reconciliation

  • Security DAM ballot resolution took place in joint session with Security, CBCC and SOA WGs
  • CDA R2 IG For CD –comments resolved during WGM
  • SOA – PASS Access Control ballot –comments resolved during WGM

New Projects

  • Medical device security in distributed systems
    • Scope statement crafted during the meeting
    • Health Care Devices (HCD) to sponsor; Security WG will co-sponsor along with other WGs
    • Scope statement will be sent to HCD for approval for September 2010 ballot