This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "April 8th, Templates Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
## Russ Hamm (RH) | ## Russ Hamm (RH) | ||
## Cecil Lynch (CL) | ## Cecil Lynch (CL) | ||
| + | ## Charlie McKay (CM) | ||
# Agenda Check | # Agenda Check | ||
| − | # DAM | + | # DAM REview from last week |
## MS - Didn't see in model how the template nodes could be placed in a tree structure mapable into a HL7 version 3 model. | ## MS - Didn't see in model how the template nodes could be placed in a tree structure mapable into a HL7 version 3 model. | ||
## MS - Attribute constrains do not clearly support HL7 datatypes. There may be other constraints. | ## MS - Attribute constrains do not clearly support HL7 datatypes. There may be other constraints. | ||
| − | ## MS - Could not see how to constrain the node of one node based on the values on one or more nodes | + | ## MS - Could not see how to constrain the node of one node based on the values on one or more nodes. |
| + | ## MS - Couldn't see how to translate from this model into a LIM (version 3 serialized.) | ||
| + | ## MS/CM - The nodes in the LIM can be named. Constraint Language needs to be able to name nodes. | ||
| + | ## CM - Once you can name nodes you can reference the nodes from the instance of the templats. Use same node naming conventions. Node parts need to go down to the level of datatype components. | ||
| + | ## MS - I think an algebraic or vector based language could be used (while you may not want to.) | ||
# New Call Time | # New Call Time | ||
# San Antonio Agenda [http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/May_2006%2C_WGM_Agenda] | # San Antonio Agenda [http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/May_2006%2C_WGM_Agenda] | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 5 April 2006
- Roll Call
- Mark Shafarman (MS)
- Ken Kawamoto (KK)
- Russ Hamm (RH)
- Cecil Lynch (CL)
- Charlie McKay (CM)
- Agenda Check
- DAM REview from last week
- MS - Didn't see in model how the template nodes could be placed in a tree structure mapable into a HL7 version 3 model.
- MS - Attribute constrains do not clearly support HL7 datatypes. There may be other constraints.
- MS - Could not see how to constrain the node of one node based on the values on one or more nodes.
- MS - Couldn't see how to translate from this model into a LIM (version 3 serialized.)
- MS/CM - The nodes in the LIM can be named. Constraint Language needs to be able to name nodes.
- CM - Once you can name nodes you can reference the nodes from the instance of the templats. Use same node naming conventions. Node parts need to go down to the level of datatype components.
- MS - I think an algebraic or vector based language could be used (while you may not want to.)
- New Call Time
- San Antonio Agenda [1]
- Next Agenda Topics
- Adjourn
http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/April_8th%2C_Templates_Agenda
