This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM Harmonization Notes April 2008"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
** The better form that the original submission is in, the easier it is to process. | ** The better form that the original submission is in, the easier it is to process. | ||
** More structured submission mechanisms lead to more automated processing of the changes. | ** More structured submission mechanisms lead to more automated processing of the changes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Agreements=== | ||
| + | * Goal of a "tool" that allows editing of vocabulary content by the membership, that can then be validated, summarized and applied to the vocabulary after approval. | ||
| + | * Develop a set of '''simple''' forms with surrounding instructions for additions or changes of: | ||
| + | ** code systems | ||
| + | ** concepts | ||
| + | ** concept domains | ||
| + | ** value set definitions | ||
| + | ** context binding statements | ||
| + | * Use the ballot's HTML representation as a starting point. | ||
| + | * The forms are positioned as aids to the committees in preparing and "debating" their proposals. They can also feed the update process directly, whether manual, wizard-based, an editor, or whatnot. | ||
| + | * Bind the forms into the current coversheet/proposal documents. | ||
Revision as of 18:33, 2 April 2008
Contents
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Attendees
- In person: Nelson (MnM), Van Hentenryck, Klein (Vocab), Seppala (PA), Walker (RCRIM), Loyd (OO), Hausam (Lab), George, Raiford, Parker (CDS), Stewart (INM), McKenzie (International), Beeler
- Online: Kreisler, Dolin (SD), Glover (Pharmacy), James, Eckerson (PHER), De Jong
Brief Summary of Harmonization Results
| ID | File Name | Result |
| 010102 | 2008Apr_HARM_PROPOSAL_RIM_MEDREC_netherlands_2_SubsAdmin as Procedure_20080306041729.doc | Approved |
| 020102 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_INM_grahame_grieve_IdentifierReliability.VER definition_20080302063228.doc | Approved |
| 020103 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_INM_grahame_grieve_PostalAddressUse.NameRepresentationUse definition_20080302183210.doc | Approved |
| 020104 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_INM_grahame_grieve_EntityNamePartType.SFX definition_20080302183156.doc | Approved |
| 020105 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_MNM_grahame_grieve_UpdateMode_20080302195151.doc | Approved |
| 020106 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_INM_grahame_grieve_NullFlavor_20080302195133.doc | Approved |
| 020107 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_INM_grahame_grieve_EntityNamePartQualifier definition_20080302183140.doc | Approved |
| 020108 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_INM_grahame_grieve_EntityNameUse definition_20080302185414.doc | Approved |
| 020109 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_INM_grahame_grieve_PostalAddressUse.SRCH definition_20080302185254.doc | Approved |
| 020113 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_INM_grahame_grieve_MediaType.PlainText definition_20080302062344.doc | Approved |
| 020121 | 2008Apr_HARM_PROPOSAL_VOCAB_LAB_robert_hausam_x_LabSpecimenCollectionProviders _20080316235831.doc | Approved |
| 020122 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_LAB_robert_hausam_PartOfWholeRelationship_20080302232915.doc | Withdrawn |
| 020123 | 2008Apr_HARM_PROPOSAL_VOCAB_LAB_robert_hausam_BatteryClassDefinition_20080316224613.doc | Approved |
| 030100 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_RCRIM_g_schadow_BasisOfStrength_20080303003543.doc | Approved |
| 030101 | 2008Apr_HARM_PROPOSAL_VOCAB_NoCommittee_g_schadow_ActClassCodes_20080316105135.doc | Rejected |
| 030102 | 2008Apr_HARM_PROPOSAL_VOCAB_RCRIM_g_schadow_ActCode_20080316105048.doc | Duplicate of 030101 |
| 030103 | 2008Apr_HARM_PROPOSAL_VOCAB_RCRIM_g_schadow_TherapeuticEquivalenceRoleCode_20080316115132.doc | Tabled |
| 030104 | 2008Apr_HARM_PROPOSAL_VOCAB_RCRIM_g_schadow_ActRelationshipDocument_20080316110424.doc | Approved |
| 030105 | 2008Apr_HARM_COVERPAGE_VOCAB_RCRIM_g_schadow_ActRelationshipDocument_20080303002827.wbk | Duplicate of 030105 |
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Attendees
- In person: Dale Nelson, Ted Klein, Gregg Seppala, Mead Walker, Patrick Loyd, Rob Hausam, Lloyd McKenzie, Joyce George, Robin Raiford, Sandy Stuart, Sara Ryan, Woody Beeler, Craig Parker
- Online: Patricia Grimes, Ioana Singureanu, Russ Hamm, Austin Kreisler
Discussion
- How can we make it easier for committees to submit proposals?
- Wizards were discussed. It was generally agreed that they can be helpful, but they are seldom capable of handling the more difficult cases.
- There was discussion about creating several different submission forms, tailored to assisting with the submission of different types of proposals.
- There was discussion about more human assistance from HQ in the submission processing (triage, checking for complexity, etc.).
- How can we make it easier to process the approved proposals in a timely fashion?
- The better form that the original submission is in, the easier it is to process.
- More structured submission mechanisms lead to more automated processing of the changes.
Agreements
- Goal of a "tool" that allows editing of vocabulary content by the membership, that can then be validated, summarized and applied to the vocabulary after approval.
- Develop a set of simple forms with surrounding instructions for additions or changes of:
- code systems
- concepts
- concept domains
- value set definitions
- context binding statements
- Use the ballot's HTML representation as a starting point.
- The forms are positioned as aids to the committees in preparing and "debating" their proposals. They can also feed the update process directly, whether manual, wizard-based, an editor, or whatnot.
- Bind the forms into the current coversheet/proposal documents.
