This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "List of Precepts Under Development"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Vitality Assessment | *Vitality Assessment | ||
*Making sure that WGs involve those whose content domain they’re touching | *Making sure that WGs involve those whose content domain they’re touching | ||
| + | *A portion of a Normative standard being dropped to a lower level (STU) during the ballot process, and is that a substantive change? | ||
| + | **One possible solution would be that these cases go to recirculation ballot. | ||
| + | *Create precepts that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:11, 19 March 2019
- Artifact governance
- Create precept regarding addressing identifier errors
- Bringing large projects into HL7
- Engagement in large cross-organizational projects
- SGB to produce a precept requiring that, in order to publish a specification, it has to be conformant to any harmonization patterns that HL7 has published
- State Machine Alignment
- How groups are to interact with Publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. WGs
- Engaging the implementer community in the consideration of changes as artifacts mature
- The addition of new tools (with EST)
- Vocabulary
- Vitality Assessment
- Making sure that WGs involve those whose content domain they’re touching
- A portion of a Normative standard being dropped to a lower level (STU) during the ballot process, and is that a substantive change?
- One possible solution would be that these cases go to recirculation ballot.
- Create precepts that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.
