This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "November 20, 2018 CBCP Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
==Meeting Minutes DRAFT== | ==Meeting Minutes DRAFT== | ||
| − | Meeting Chair: | + | Meeting Chair: Johnathan |
* review of agenda, roll call | * review of agenda, roll call | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
'''DS4P Reaffirmation''' | '''DS4P Reaffirmation''' | ||
* several ballots up for reaffirmation | * several ballots up for reaffirmation | ||
| − | * Thursday December 6th is close date for voting in | + | * Thursday December 6th is close date for voting in January ballot |
| + | '''CBCP FHIR''' | ||
| + | ''FHIR Consent / Consent-Contract Discovery White Paper'' | ||
| + | * reviewed Contract Consent Comparison Table/paper | ||
| + | * moving forward - possibly ballot as a white paper | ||
| + | ** this was designed for internal use to make sure all the players are on the same place--roles and such, for future work | ||
| + | * for decision maker especially for implementers | ||
| + | ** not something that needs to be decide today | ||
| + | * to inform internally, pilots and vendors, implementers of what the capabilities are and for use with different use cases... | ||
| + | * no additional questions/comments made | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | additional questions/agenda items | ||
| − | + | Motion to adjourn (Jim) | |
| − | + | Meeting adjourned at 1053 Arizona Time --[[User:Suzannegw|Suzannegw]] ([[User talk:Suzannegw|talk]]) 12:54, 20 November 2018 (EST) | |
Latest revision as of 18:07, 20 November 2018
Contents
November 20, 2018 CBCP Conference Call
Attendees
| Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | Johnathan ColemanCBCP Co-Chair | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCP Co-Chair | . | Jim Kretz CBCP Co-Chair | x | David Pyke CBCP Co-Chair | ||||
| x | Kathleen Connor Security Co-Chair | . | Mike Davis | . | John Moehrke Security Co-Chair | . | Diana Proud-Madruga | ||||
| . | Chris Shawn | x | Irina Connelly | . | Joe Lamy | . | Greg Linden | ||||
| x | Dave Silver | x | Francisco Jauregui | x | Mark Meadows | . | Jack Wallace | ||||
| x | David Staggs | . | Beth Pumo | . | Amber Patel | x | Becky Angeles | ||||
| . | Mohammad Jafari | x | Ken Salyards | . | Bonnie Young | x | Greg White | ||||
| x | Katie Sullivan | x | [mailto:] | . | [mailto: ] | x | [mailto: |
Agenda DRAFT
- Roll Call, Agenda Review
- Meeting Minutes approval:
- November 6 Wiki location: November 06 Meeting Minutes
- eLTSS Update - Irina / Becky
- Ballot reconciliation - comment disposition review
- eLTSS Block Vote
- eLTSS ballot spreadsheet
- Ballot reconciliation - comment disposition review
- Review eLTSS FHIR IG proposal
- FHIR proposal page
- FHIR IG Proposal
- DS4P Reaffirmation Ballot - Update
- CBCP FHIR
- FHIR Consent / Consent-Contract Discovery White Paper
- FHIR CPs for review
- FHIR Consent CPs are located: link to ALL Consent Change requests
Meeting Minutes DRAFT
Meeting Chair: Johnathan
- review of agenda, roll call
Motion to approve: (Dave/Jim) Vote: Abstentions: none; Against: none; Approval: 17 (Suzanne to confirm #, some duplicates on call)
eLTSS Ballot Reconciliation
- reviewed remaining (comments #66-75)
- Questions? none
eLTSS IG for May 2019 Ballot
- Motion: (Suzanne/Becky) to approve comment resolutions
NO further discussion *abstentions: none; Against: none; Approve: 17 (Suzanne to confirm)
- with approval the IG as shown will be sent over to FHIR Management group for approval
Motion to approval (Dave/Jim) Vote: Abstentions: none; Against: none; Approval: 17 (No further discussion)
DS4P Reaffirmation
- several ballots up for reaffirmation
- Thursday December 6th is close date for voting in January ballot
CBCP FHIR FHIR Consent / Consent-Contract Discovery White Paper
- reviewed Contract Consent Comparison Table/paper
- moving forward - possibly ballot as a white paper
- this was designed for internal use to make sure all the players are on the same place--roles and such, for future work
- for decision maker especially for implementers
- not something that needs to be decide today
- to inform internally, pilots and vendors, implementers of what the capabilities are and for use with different use cases...
- no additional questions/comments made
additional questions/agenda items
Motion to adjourn (Jim) Meeting adjourned at 1053 Arizona Time --Suzannegw (talk) 12:54, 20 November 2018 (EST)
