This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2018-11-07 SGB Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst:: SGB Template}}") |
|||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
*Agenda review | *Agenda review | ||
| − | *Approve Minutes of [[2018- | + | *Approve Minutes of [[2018-10-31_SGB_Conference_Call]] |
*Action Items | *Action Items | ||
| + | **Paul to contact PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3 | ||
| + | ***Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient | ||
| + | **Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue | ||
| + | **Paul to draft precept on artifact governance | ||
| + | **Wayne to reach out to Argonaut project leads re: Argonaut diagnostic report development | ||
| + | **Anne to work with Josh to set up SGB page to communicate decisions/precepts by January | ||
| + | **Austin to discuss separation of concerns issue with Lloyd | ||
| + | **Group to review [http://www.hl7.org/permalink/?PLCPD Project Life Cycle for Product Development (PLCPD) document] and add to agenda for 2018-11-14 call | ||
*Discussion Topics | *Discussion Topics | ||
| + | **Issues and risks around balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR | ||
| + | **Continued discussion: Currency of Value Set Content | ||
| + | **SGB Communication Plan | ||
| + | **Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions | ||
| + | **[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=List_of_Precepts_Under_Development '''Precepts We Need to Develop'''] | ||
*Parking Lot | *Parking Lot | ||
| + | **Mapping coordination | ||
| + | **Add link to Confluence page from ARB page | ||
| + | **Review of product management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope | ||
| + | **Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change | ||
| + | **Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM | ||
| + | **Review Mission and Charter | ||
| + | **Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities | ||
| + | **Technical Alignments Between Product Families | ||
| + | **How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. | ||
| + | **Precept on bringing in large projects | ||
| + | **Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts | ||
| + | **Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans? | ||
| + | **BAM guidance on process for product adoption | ||
| + | **Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- '''to do in April/before Cologne''' | ||
| + | **[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Product_Director_Page FHIR Product Director Position Description]: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB | ||
| + | **Ownership of content | ||
| + | **What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model? | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
Revision as of 22:12, 5 November 2018
back to Standards Governance Board main page
| HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2018-MM-DD Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
| Facilitator | Paul/Lorraine | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| Calvin Beebe | |||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| Russ Hamm | |||
| Tony Julian | |||
| Paul Knapp | |||
| Ewout Kramer | |||
| Austin Kreisler | |||
| Wayne Kubick | |||
| Thom Kuhn | |||
| Ken McCaslin | |||
| Rik Smithies | |||
| Sandy Stuart | |||
| Quorum: Chair + 4 | |||
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-10-31_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Paul to contact PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
- Paul to draft precept on artifact governance
- Wayne to reach out to Argonaut project leads re: Argonaut diagnostic report development
- Anne to work with Josh to set up SGB page to communicate decisions/precepts by January
- Austin to discuss separation of concerns issue with Lloyd
- Group to review Project Life Cycle for Product Development (PLCPD) document and add to agenda for 2018-11-14 call
- Paul to contact PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- Issues and risks around balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR
- Continued discussion: Currency of Value Set Content
- SGB Communication Plan
- Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
- Precepts We Need to Develop
- Parking Lot
- Mapping coordination
- Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
- Review of product management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
